Na Pro Technology A Family Physicians Protocol Toronto

  • Slides: 55
Download presentation
Na. Pro. Technology® A Family Physician’s Protocol Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle

Na. Pro. Technology® A Family Physician’s Protocol Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle MICGP MRCGP CNFPMC 1

Fertility Care. TM Taking Care of your fertility Na. Pro. Technology® A New Reproductive

Fertility Care. TM Taking Care of your fertility Na. Pro. Technology® A New Reproductive Science that works by co -operating with the natural procreative cycle 2

Na. Pro. Technology® s Physiology before Pathology s A Disease Based approach to infertility

Na. Pro. Technology® s Physiology before Pathology s A Disease Based approach to infertility s If not………. why not? 3

IVF- Diagnosis before Treatment 42% Unexplained 4

IVF- Diagnosis before Treatment 42% Unexplained 4

Na. Pro. Technology® s Consistent with accepted medical principles – History (standardised medical form)

Na. Pro. Technology® s Consistent with accepted medical principles – History (standardised medical form) – Symptoms – Signs – Investigations – Diagnosis – Targeted Medical / Surgical Treatment 5

The Fertility. Care. TM System (History) s s s s Unable to conceive Previous

The Fertility. Care. TM System (History) s s s s Unable to conceive Previous miscarriage Previous Ectopic Pregnancy Prematurity Low Birth Weight Placental Abruption Pregnancy induced Hypertension (Not PET) 6

The Fertility. Care. TM System (Symptoms) s Premenstrual Tension u lasting for 5 days

The Fertility. Care. TM System (Symptoms) s Premenstrual Tension u lasting for 5 days or more u relieved with menses s Record Average u Symptoms, u Days, u Duration, u Severity out of 10 7

The Fertility. Care Chart (Clinical Signs) s s s s Dry Cycles Limited Mucus

The Fertility. Care Chart (Clinical Signs) s s s s Dry Cycles Limited Mucus Premenstrual Spotting Intermenstrual spotting Tail-end brown bleeding Short luteal phase Long cycles 8

Targeted Hormone Evaluation Investigation Level 1. 9

Targeted Hormone Evaluation Investigation Level 1. 9

Targeted Hormone Evaluation (Investigation Level 1. ) s Peak Plus 7 Progesterone (18. 5

Targeted Hormone Evaluation (Investigation Level 1. ) s Peak Plus 7 Progesterone (18. 5 - 31. 0 ng/dl) (60 - 100 nmol/L) Oestradiol (145 – 300 pg/l) (400 – 800 pmol/l) s Peak Plus 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 s Pre Peak P-3, P-1, P+1 Oestradiol only - Over 370 pg/l (1000 nmol/l) 10

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Structural Assessment – Uterus - Fibroids, Polyps,

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Structural Assessment – Uterus - Fibroids, Polyps, Retroverted – Tubes - Hydrosalpinx – Ovaries - Cysts, Endometrioma 11

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Follicular Tracking 12

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Follicular Tracking 12

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Follicular Tracking u Small Follicles u Incomplete

Ultrasound Studies (Investigation Level 2. ) s Follicular Tracking u Small Follicles u Incomplete (Partial) Rupture u Luteinised Unruptured Follicle u Normal Rupture u Endometrial Response 13

Surgical Evaluation (Investigation Level 3. ) s Lap and Dye s Hysteroscopy s Transcervical

Surgical Evaluation (Investigation Level 3. ) s Lap and Dye s Hysteroscopy s Transcervical Catheterisation of Fallopian Tube. USA s Laparotomy and Microsurgery 14

Diagnosis FUNCTIONAL s Hormone deficiency - Follicular or Luteal? s Ovulatory defect - Anovulation,

Diagnosis FUNCTIONAL s Hormone deficiency - Follicular or Luteal? s Ovulatory defect - Anovulation, Luteinised Unruptured Follicle Syndrome, Partial follicular rupture. s Limited cervical Mucus Flow s Male Factor STRUCTURAL s Surgical - Endometriosis, PCOD, Fibroids, Polyp, Uterine Septum, PID. 15

Treatment FUNCTIONAL s Luteal Phase Support - HCG, Progesterone s Mucus Enhancers - Vitamin

Treatment FUNCTIONAL s Luteal Phase Support - HCG, Progesterone s Mucus Enhancers - Vitamin B 6, Mucolytics, Antibiotics s Stress Management s Male Treatment s Ovulation Induction - Clomiphene, HCG, FSH, Gn. RH STRUCTURAL s Surgical - Endometriosis, Ovarian Diathermy, Fibroids, Polyp, Uterine Septum, PID. AIM is to restore normal Function over 12 effective cycles 16

Na. Pro. Technology Co-operates with the couple’s natural procreative potential to achieve optimum function.

Na. Pro. Technology Co-operates with the couple’s natural procreative potential to achieve optimum function. s s s Creighton Model Fertility. Care. TM System Medical Treatments Surgical Treatments Counselling - Stress Management Spiritual Support - prayer for couples 17

The Creighton Model Fertility. Care. TM System s The Fertility. Care. TM system is

The Creighton Model Fertility. Care. TM System s The Fertility. Care. TM system is the cornerstone to evaluation and treatment with Na. Pro. Technology® s Everything is built on or around the fertility chart 18

The Creighton Model Fertility. Care. TM System s Charting abnormalities are just the tip

The Creighton Model Fertility. Care. TM System s Charting abnormalities are just the tip of a very large patho-physiologic iceberg! 19

Charting abnormalities Are associated with: u Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal Dysfunction u Poor Follicular Function u Abnormal

Charting abnormalities Are associated with: u Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal Dysfunction u Poor Follicular Function u Abnormal levels of Oestradiol 17 Beta, Progesterone u Endometriosis u Pelvic Adhesions u Polycystic Ovaries 20

Not Suitable s s s Established Menopause Zero Sperm count / Motility Completely Blocked

Not Suitable s s s Established Menopause Zero Sperm count / Motility Completely Blocked Fallopian Tubes despite surgical reconstruction 21

Creighton Model Na. Pro. Tracking s s s Important for the initial evaluation Timing

Creighton Model Na. Pro. Tracking s s s Important for the initial evaluation Timing of Hormone Blood Tests To Monitor the response to treatment cycle by cycle u Mucus u Hormones u Timing for Intercourse u Effects of stress 22

Infertility Protocol -Family Physician s s s s Initial Medical Consultation Na. Pro. Tracking

Infertility Protocol -Family Physician s s s s Initial Medical Consultation Na. Pro. Tracking for 2 cycles Blood Tests & Seminal fluid analysis (using seminal fluid collecting device) - 2 nd cycle Medical Review - 3 rd cycle Ultrasound Evaluation Ultrasound Follicle Tracking Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy - 6 th cycle 12 effective cycles of medical treatment 23

45 MINUTES per CONSULTATION 24

45 MINUTES per CONSULTATION 24

The Couple manage their own fertility under supervision by their “Fertility. Care Physician” and

The Couple manage their own fertility under supervision by their “Fertility. Care Physician” and Teacher-Practitioner 25

Case Presentations 1. Case 1 2. Case 2 3. Case 3 26

Case Presentations 1. Case 1 2. Case 2 3. Case 3 26

Case 1 s s Married 8 years, Both Aged 35 years. 7 Pregnancy Losses

Case 1 s s Married 8 years, Both Aged 35 years. 7 Pregnancy Losses 1993 - 1999 u 10 w, 18 w, 31 w, 26 w, 17 w u 2 miscarriages, 3 Stillbirths, 2 miscarriages. s s Nurse Attended 3 different Specialists, – Locally, Dublin, London 27

Case 1 s s s s Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin Antibodies, b 2 glycoprotein 1,

Case 1 s s s s Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin Antibodies, b 2 glycoprotein 1, Rheumatoid factor, ANA, CRP, ALL NORMAL Chromosomes, TORCH Hysteroscopy 28

Case 1 29

Case 1 29

Case 1 s s s Low Progesterone Low Oestradiol 17 Beta Raised TSH 8.

Case 1 s s s Low Progesterone Low Oestradiol 17 Beta Raised TSH 8. 5 30

Case 1 s Corrected Hormonal Deficiencies Preconception with – Clomid 50 mg od x

Case 1 s Corrected Hormonal Deficiencies Preconception with – Clomid 50 mg od x 3/7 – Eltroxin 50 ug daily – HCG 2000, P+3, 5, 7, 9. 31

Case 1 s s s Conceived with optimum hormone levels Took Prog 200 mg

Case 1 s s s Conceived with optimum hormone levels Took Prog 200 mg x 2 /w, HCG 5000 x 2 /w Aspirin, Heparin. Prog. Support for 30 weeks Delivered Healthy Baby Girl, Eilís Induced at 39 weeks, Nov ‘ 00. NVD Weight 7 lb 11 oz. 32

Case 1 s Conceived with same Rx 14 months later s Delivered live female

Case 1 s Conceived with same Rx 14 months later s Delivered live female in March ‘ 02 s Elective LSCS at 41 weeks, Weight 9 lbs. 1 oz 33

Case 2 s Primary Dx Fibroids – Myomectomy 1996 s Female infant 1997 NVD

Case 2 s Primary Dx Fibroids – Myomectomy 1996 s Female infant 1997 NVD s Unable to conceive since then 34

Case 2 s s Age 37 yrs. G 1 P 1 Secondary Infertility 1999

Case 2 s s Age 37 yrs. G 1 P 1 Secondary Infertility 1999 u LAP – Adhesions secondary to myomectomy u Laparotomy repair s Rx Clomid x 3/12, FSH x 3/12 s IVF - Oct. 00, and again frozen transfer Feb. 01 ( 1 IVF 2 Embryo T/F) u? ? Suitable for Na. Pro 35

Case 2 s Fertility. Care Chart – Normal in appearance 36

Case 2 s Fertility. Care Chart – Normal in appearance 36

Case 2 s s Peak + 7 Peak + 3, 5, 7, 9, 11

Case 2 s s Peak + 7 Peak + 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 37

Case 2 38

Case 2 38

Case 2 s Ultrasound Follicle Tracking 39

Case 2 s Ultrasound Follicle Tracking 39

Case 2 s Repeat Laparoscopy Apr 02 s Laparotomy and Microsurgery Dec 02 s

Case 2 s Repeat Laparoscopy Apr 02 s Laparotomy and Microsurgery Dec 02 s Mucus enhancers Stress management FFI No Hormonal Treatment s s 40

Case 2 s s s Conceived May 2003 Excellent initial hormone levels Dramatic drop

Case 2 s s s Conceived May 2003 Excellent initial hormone levels Dramatic drop at 6 -7 weeks Bleeding in pregnancy Miscarried 8 weeks gestation Probable Embryo factor 41

Case 3 s s Feb 99 37 yrs. Female, and Male G 1 P

Case 3 s s Feb 99 37 yrs. Female, and Male G 1 P 3 6 yr. Old Boy SA 2 (12 and 13 weeks) 42

Case 3 43

Case 3 43

Case 3 First Attempt s HCG 2000 P+3, 5, 7, 9 s P+7 P

Case 3 First Attempt s HCG 2000 P+3, 5, 7, 9 s P+7 P = 66. 6 nmol/l (20. 7) E 2 = 301 pmol/l (82. 0) ADD Clomid 100 mg daily x 5 days s 44

Case 3 First Attempt s P+7 P = 89. 8 nmol/l (28. 2) E

Case 3 First Attempt s P+7 P = 89. 8 nmol/l (28. 2) E 2 = 290 pmol/l (79. 0) s P+17 P = 61. 8 nmol/l (19. 4) 45

Case 3 Second Attempt s s Clomid 150 mg daily x 5 days HCG

Case 3 Second Attempt s s Clomid 150 mg daily x 5 days HCG 2000 P+3, 5, 7, 9 Add prednisolone 5 mg daily P+7 P = Usually normal E 2 = Usually low 46

Case 3 Ultrasound series 47

Case 3 Ultrasound series 47

Case 3 Blood Test Results s E 2 - Pre Peak - 544 pmol/L

Case 3 Blood Test Results s E 2 - Pre Peak - 544 pmol/L (148 pg/ml) – aim > 1, 000 nmol/l ( 370 g/ml) s P+7 - Prog - 99. 1 nmol/L (31. 1 ng/dl) E 2 - 341 pmol/L (92. 9 pg/ml) 48

Case 3 Outcome s Renal Agenesis s Baby Boy RIP – 26 weeks approx.

Case 3 Outcome s Renal Agenesis s Baby Boy RIP – 26 weeks approx. 49

Case 3 3 rd Attempt s Puregon (FSH) 100 iu sc daily for 10

Case 3 3 rd Attempt s Puregon (FSH) 100 iu sc daily for 10 days, start day 3 of cycle HCG 5, 000 sc on day 12 Cyclogest (Progesterone) PV 400 mg for 10 nights STRESS MANAGEMENT s 6 th cycle ready to try s s s 50

Case 3 Blood Test Results s Ultrasound 2 follicles, one 22 x 20 mm

Case 3 Blood Test Results s Ultrasound 2 follicles, one 22 x 20 mm s E 2 - Pre Peak - Not available s P+7 - Prog - 122. 1 nmol/L (38. 3 ng/dl) E 2 - 899 pmol/L (245 ng/dl) 51

Na. Pro. Technology® A Family Physician’s Protocol Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle

Na. Pro. Technology® A Family Physician’s Protocol Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle MICGP MRCGP CNFPMC 52

The Irish Na. Pro Statistics s Approx. 1200 couples over 4 years Average Female

The Irish Na. Pro Statistics s Approx. 1200 couples over 4 years Average Female age - 36 yrs. Average time trying to conceive - 5 yrs. s Approx. 25% - history of unsuccessful IVF s s 53

Estimated Success s Approx. 340 successful Pregnancies s Approx. 25 - 30% success overall

Estimated Success s Approx. 340 successful Pregnancies s Approx. 25 - 30% success overall u Substantially higher with lifetable analysis, accounting for dropouts u still in preparation for publication 54

Questions Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle MICGP MRCGP CFCMC 55

Questions Toronto July ‘ 03 Dr. Phil Boyle MICGP MRCGP CFCMC 55