My Life in Ghost hunting By Dr Paul

My Life in Ghost “hunting” By Dr. Paul Lee

WHO AM I? • 33 years old, born on Hallowe’en • BSc in Physics from Southampton • Ph. D in Nuclear Physics from York • Currently works as a software engineer for a large Worldwide Systems Company • Life-long interest in ghosts, Forteana and the paranormal • Was a believer in psychic ability, now very sceptical!

Where have I been? • Nearly 30 cases since the mid 1990 s • Cases range from the Edinburgh Vaults to Beaulieu Abbey • I would like to go on more cases but the “Most Haunted” effect is making it difficult!

Basic Principle of Vigils • Sit in the dark, waiting for things to happen • Make a note of events (sounds etc. ) heard by different teams to eliminate non-paranormal events afterward. • Obvious drawbacks- very boring and very fruitless • Some researchers have little or nothing to show for decades worth of patience • Humans are very poor observers and data gatherers- many teams use video cameras etc. • Some “Most Haunted wannabee” groups are medium-led, for instance “The UK Ghost Investigators”

Run by Heidi Graham and Alan Smallwood, after Heidi’s previous partner had been ousted. Orb obsessed, medium-centric group Very much a “I’m Psychic, and you’re not so you I’m right and you’re wrong so you will do what I say” foot-stamping group: don’t really investigate ghosts; just rely on the uncorroborated rantings of the psychics.

A disgruntled member writes…. . “A few years ago [the UKGI] a vigil at Bowden house so I joined their website "family" & put my name on the list to attend, David from *** also put his name on the list to go as did another member who put her name down (‘S’) but by that time all the places had gone. As the date approached my girlfriend at the time came down to visit me from Worcester so I pulled out of the vigil & let ‘S’ take my place instead. ‘S’ is a girl who suffered from a stroke when she was 19 which affected her badly (When we first met her she was on 2 crutches, which then went to 1 & now she's ok), she is also a medium. ‘S’ had told the UKGI members that she had a stroke. All was going well with their vigil until Heidi turned around to ‘S’ & told her that there was an evil presence following her around & that it was her grandfather (Who had passed over) that had caused her to have her stroke as a sign that there was an afterlife! This freaked Sammy out to the point she was crying, David found her stood in the kitchen area upset so enquired what was wrong so she told him, that p*ssed him off. The following Monday they relayed this to the rest of the group so I went onto their website to tell them what went on & how twisted Heidi was, my message was deleted & Heidi phoned me up at my house & told me she didn't appreciate what I'd written & then tried denying all that went on with ‘S’ & spent 5 minutes telling me how she loved ‘S’ to bits!” “Psychic jealousy? Worried about stealing the limelight? ”

Beaulieu Abbey, Hampshire, March 2003 Alan Smallwood excitedly proclaiming “That’s an apparition!” while watching strange shadows on a night-shot time lapse digital video camera I was watching the same scene through my simple hand-held night vision monocular scope. I saw no such shadows. Therefore, this must have been a camera artefact. UKGI ignored this in favour of phantom monks.

Farnham Castle, June 2003 • My third and last “investigation” with UKGI • More rubbish from a trio of psychics feeding off - and trying to out-do each other • No regard for scientific – or Common sense ideas: e. g camera Flashes going off constantly to Catch “orbs” destroy night vision! When I brought my feelings to the UKGI’s attention, I was banned from their group!

Clerkenwell House of Detention, May 1999 • Organised by the Ghost Club. • The investigation organiser’s idea of “equipment” were just thermometers - not a good start! • The proceedings were dominated by a very unconvincing “psychic” who liked to be the centre of attention…. a trick she pulled in October at Charlton House when she tried to convince us that fireworks were “spirit raps” – this was 8 days before November 5 th! • I was eventually to leave the Ghost Club due to unfair pricing policies practised by the club.

Many groups seem to be a device for feeding the ego of the founder. For instance, one group that touts its “scientific research” has, it is said, provided free trips to the US for mediums. ie. Not people with a scientific background, or with internationally recognised qualified research credentials. Talking of mediums and psychics…. Most of their information is either confirmed by historical accounts…. or can’t be corroborated at all! So why use mediums? What good is the information they provide?

Some thoughts about recent ghost hunts There is a very high level of credulous buffoonery Lack of technical knowledge and ignorance leads to embarrassing and easily debunked theories e. g. “Orbs” “Most Haunted” has launched dozens of clones: these are either wannabees, who copy the format, or groups who are trying to make money out of ghosthunting (such as Ghosts-UK). Venues that either charged little or nothing for access now charge a fortune (e. g. The Ram Inn near Bristol was once free: now it is £ 40 person). Most groups are thrill seekers with no intention of furthering the field of study: such groups dilute ghost cases and force out genuine researchers, like ASSAP, the SPR etc.

ORBS • Orbs are commonly thought of as only appearing on digital cameras (ie since the mid 1990 s) • They have been appearing on film well before that though! • So, why so many orbs photos in the last few years? • Digital cameras enable you to take dozens of pictures – and instantly view and delete the ones you don’t want. I have seen this happen! Non-orb pictures tend to get deleted… • Camera manufacturers (Canon et al) have stated that orbs are minute particles close to the lens; dust, water vapour, hair etc. - they even provide information on how to get rid of orbs from photos • But…. . most paranormal “experts” dismiss this, but then again, they aren’t necessarily experts in photography.

• If paranormal enthusiasts don’t agree with the dust orb theory, then it is up to them to provide an alternative. • …. On the proviso that such theories can be tested. • It is simply not good enough to come up with bald statements, such as “orbs are the first stage of a spirit manifestation. ” • How do they know this? Has anyone seen this happen? And why has no-one seen the second stage of a spirit manifestation from an orb?

What about the claim that orbs obey instructions etc. ? Does anyone remember Jaytee the dog, shown on Paul Mc. Kenna’s “World of the Paranormal” TV series in the 1990 s? This was a dog that was alleged to have psychic abilities and knew when her master was returning home by running to the window. “The dog is psychic” proclaimed Mc. Kenna at the end. But only by selective use of footage! When all the footage is viewed, the dog’s reactions can be determined to be random. The same situation exists with orbs – by only dealing with a few selected examples, any theory can be proven. But suppressing the evidence that you don’t like is tantamount to fraud – and serves to delude yourself.

Some conclusions…. . • Ghost hunts are a useless way of gathering paranormal data: the amateur groups lack funding, expertise or experience (especially in technical matters). • I view ghost hunts as good social occasions these days. • I have not encountered one single definite unexplainable event since becoming an active investigator – just loads of bafflegab from “psychics”. • However, when things do happen, it almost always happens when the observers are in a relaxed, or distracted frame of mind The maxim practised by a lot of paranormal enthusiasts is: “Why settle for a rational, mundane explanation when a paranormal one will suffice? ”

Two important Rules of Thumb I Always Remember “Never attempt to explain one mystery by invoking another” -”Bord’s Law” (after Janet And Colin Bord, Forteana Researchers) “If something seems mundane or rational…. then it probably is” - “Lee’s Law” (coined by me) “There is a huge difference between open minded and being credulous”

So, why isn’t gathering subjective, random, one-off data considering scientific? What does happen: What should happen: 1. Devise Theory Rework Theory 2. Design and perform Experiment 3. Does Theory Match Experiment? Yes No Gather evidence NB: some groups do repeat sessions at the same venue for “repeatable” results, e. g Dr. Braithewaite at Muncaster Castle Given “evidence”, how does one work backwards to a theory? Theory Proven NB: Results should be repeatable! Some observational sciences (eg Astronomy) follow this loop: observe – theorise - compare

So, what about the future……. . ? • I am not aware of any Universities or REPUTABLE institutions performing research into spontaneous cases. • For the foreseeable future, all “research” will be performed by amateur groups – with their own agendas (e. g. suspicions regarding the use of technology etc. ) • I find the reliance on human senses to be unconvincing • I have been advocating a completely computer driven data gathering system for years, to remove fallible human senses “from the loop”. • No luck as yet though!

Any Questions……. ? Contact me via my website ( http: //www. paullee. com ) - more of my ghost writings can be found there. Read about your favourite psychics cheating, and more fraud in the paranormal world at http: //www. badpsychics. co. uk