MXICO MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 1 June 2013

MÉXICO MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 1 June, 2013

United Mexican States The United Mexican States is a democratic, secular, Federal Constitutional Republic, comprising 31 free and sovereign states, and its capital city, a Federal Distric which serves as the venue for the federal powers. The federal government is composed by three branches: the Executive Power, represented by the President and an appointed cabinet, the Legislative Power constituted by a bi-cameral congress and the Judiciary Power. The Executive Power 2 The Legislative Power The Judiciary Power GENERAL DIRECCION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION

United Mexican States The Executive Branch is represented by the President of the United Mexican States. The Organic Law of the Federal Public Administration provides the basis for the organization of the federal government , both centralized and parastatal, and includes all the Ministries such as the Ministry of Public Administration, the Ministry of the Interior, and also the Legal Department and the Attorney’s General Office. The article 37 of the Organic Law of the Federal Public Administration, sets the Ministry of Public Administration’s functions and powers. MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: Attribution: Monitors federal public servants to adhere to the law when exercising their functions and penalize those who fail to do so. 3 The Internal Organs of Control In order to compliance with this attribution, will be assisted by the following administrative units. Cooperates General Direction of Information and Integration (DGII) GENERAL DIRECCION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION

United Mexican States GENERAL DIRECTION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION This Unit’s duty is to integrate and assist Internal Organs of Controls in the public servant’s corruption investigative cases, or can investigate corruption cases directly. In order to obtain the best results in the fighting against corruption cases, we work in coordination assisting and exchanging information with other Ministries or Agencies, like Ministry of Interior by the Federal Police, Center of Intelligence and National Security (CISEN) and the Technical Secretariat of the National Security Council 4 Ministry Finance (SHCP) by the Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF) and the Tax Administration Service (SAT) • Cooperation Agreements Attorney’s General Office by the Public Prosecutors Office and the Federal Ministerial Police, to succesfully carry out “Mistery Client” strategy GENERAL DIRECCION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION

GENERAL DIRECTION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION By april 2004, the Congress of the Union issued a regulation to order to the Executive Power to care, preserve and maintain national security. 2004 In January 2005, the National Security Council established the way and terms to observe in order to make investigations to preserve the Constitutional Order and National Unity. The Ministry of Public Administration fully became a National Security Council’s member, who rely this duty in the General Direction of Information and Integration. 2005 2006 5 By November 2006, both Ministries of the Interior and Public Administration signed an agreement called : “Joint Declarations of the Cooperation basis in the framework of the National Security Law”, whose statement 3 established that the General Direction of Information and Integration is as a National Security Unit. GENERAL DIRECCION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION

GENERAL DIRECTION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION MISTERY CLIENT STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATIONS DGII PRODUCTS ASSET INVESTIGATION COMPUTER FORENSIC INFORMATION UNITS IN THE INTERNAL ORGANS OF CONTROL 6 GENERAL DIRECCION OF INFORMATION AND INTEGRATION

MISTERY CLIENT STRATEGY Background It began as a mechanism to verify the quality of the services given by the government units, and was implemented by the Ministry of Public Administration and the Internal Organs of Control. It was originated by private enterprises as “Mystery Shoppers” program. 7 The Ministry used to hire senior citizens, students, fellows, and citizens who were under covered to monitor public servants to overtake them in the course of their duties if they suspect that an irregularity, fraud, corruption or malpractice may have been committed. The results were just a suggestion to improve the given services, but not to punished public servant’s faults. June, 2013

MISTERY CLIENT STRATEGY PARADIGM CHANGE What is it? By 2008, the strategy was redefined. It is an operative strategy to verify public servants duties. What is it for? By September 2008, DGII was entrusted with the strategy implementation To detect and caught public servants in flagrante delicto, as bribery or corruption acts against other public servants or citizens or enterprises. How does it work? Therefore, by 2009, the Ministry of Public Administration Internal Regulation was reformed and new duties were assigned to the DGII 8 Reporting public servant’s corruptions acts to the Ministry of Public Administration or Internal Control Organs, and the evidence of the misbehavior. June, 2013

COMPUTER FORENSIC DEFINITION Computers forensic is the science branch that acquires, preserves and analyzes stored data in digital media, to present facts and opinions to investigative and judicial units. WHAT IS IT FOR? q As evidence in criminal law. q To analyze local and remote digital storage devices. 9 June, 2013

COMPUTERS FORENSIC Computer forensics techniques allows to get evidence to prove publics servants misbehavior. Forensic software to analyze and copy hard disk drives 10 June, 2013

“PRONOSTICOS” CASE “PRONOSTICOS” Fraud in the procedure for awarding prizes Six Pronósticos Deportivos’s public servants, a National Lottery branch, defrauded the institution for about 110 million pesos. DGII investigated the modus operandi and fully identified them. The oportunity for interaction with other agencies, as well as to the appropiate use of information, in collaboration with OICPronósticos, General Attorney (PGR) and the Financial Intelligence Unit, it was evident the flow of resources collected and deposited in the Mexican financial system. . 11 June, 2013

PERFORMED ACTIONS COMPUTERS FORENSIC PHASE 1 Forensics procedures were applied, like data recovery from computer hard disks where the videos were recorded and edited to manipulate the lottery results. 12 June, 2013

PERFORMED ACTIONS COMPUTERS FORENSIC PHASE 2 Forensics procedures were also applied to the surveillance system to get the videos from the day the fraud was made. 13 June, 2013

PERFORMED ACTIONS COMPUTERS FORENSIC PHASE 3 The videos were checked sequentially to identify how the public servants managed to trick the results and those results were reported as evidence to ministerial authority. 14 June, 2013

PERFORMED ACTIONS Results 1 2 3 4 15 • The fraud and the modus operandi to simulate the lottery results were detected. • Computer forensics analysis helped to get stronger evidence against the public servants, in order to impose administrative and financial penalties. • By the other hand, preliminary inquiry was strengthened through computers forensics analysis and criminal actions were prosecuted by the corresponding judicial authorities. • As it was said before, with the findings obtained from the computer forensics analysis it found sufficient evidence for the judicial authority to determine the impound of bank accounts, in which were deposited the economic resources that were fraudulently obtained, up to an amount of $ 110, 000 million MXN. June, 2013

Problemática: Presunto fraude en el procedimiento de adjudicación de premios 16 June, 2013

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THANK YOU 17 June, 2013