Muon ID and Isolation Efficiencies in 2012 Run
- Slides: 28
Muon ID and Isolation Efficiencies in 2012 Run. AB CMS Collaboration
• Muon ID efficiencies: Outline – Tight • • global muon PF muon global. Track. normalized. Chi 2< 10 global. Track. number. Of. Valid. Muon. Hits > 0 number. Of. Matched. Stations > 1 |dxy| < 0. 2 cm, |dz| < 0. 5 cm number. Of. Valid. Pixel. Hits > 0 tracker. Layers. With. Measurement > 5 – Loose • PF muon • global or tracker muon • Isolation efficiencies for tight muons: – tracker relative isolation ((∑p. T(TRK))/p. T) < 0. 1 (cone ΔR=0. 3) – combined relative PF isolation (∑ET(ch. Had from PV)+∑ET(neut. Had)+∑ET(photons))/p. T < 0. 12 and < 0. 20 with d. Beta correction for pile up (cone ΔR =0. 4). Delta. Beta: Correction to the neutral component of the combined isolation, taking into account the charged particles in the cone of interest but with particles not originating from the primary vertex, and the average of neutral to charged particles as measured in jets • Plot efficiencies for Data, MC and scale factors vs eta, pt (barrel, overlap, endcap), number of vertices
Method – Method: Tn. P Selection on Zs • Tag muon: – Tight 2012 definition – p. T > 15 Ge. V – matched to trigger (Iso. Mu 24) for trigger efficiencies • Z mass window: 70 - 130 Ge. V • PDF shape: – signal = sum of 2 Voigts – background = exponential
Plots for Approval • Loose Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs eta • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 4
Plots for Approval • Loose Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the barrel • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 5
Plots for Approval • Loose Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the overlap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 6
Plots for Approval • Loose Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the endcap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 7
Plots for Approval • Loose Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs Number of Vertices • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 8
Plots for Approval • Tight Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs eta • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 9
Plots for Approval • Tight Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the barrel • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 10
Plots for Approval • Tight Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the overlap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 11
Plots for Approval • Tight Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs pt in the endcap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 12
Plots for Approval • Tight Selection Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors vs Number of Vertices • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes general tracks 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 13
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs eta Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 14
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the barrel Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 15
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the overlap Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 16
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the endcap Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 17
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs Number of Vertices Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 18
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 20 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs Eta Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 19
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 20 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the barrel Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 20
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 12 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the overlap Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 21
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 20 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs pt in the endcap Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 22
Plots for Approval • • • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 20 for PF Combined Relative Isolation with Delta. Beta correction for pile up vs Number of Vertices Tn. P method used on Zs Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 23
Plots for Approval • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 1 for Tracker Relative Isolation vs eta • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 24
Plots for Approval • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 1 for Tracker Relative Isolation vs pt in the barrel • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 25
Plots for Approval • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 1 for Tracker Relative Isolation vs pt in the overlap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 26
Plots for Approval • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 1 for Tracker Relative Isolation vs pt in the endcap • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 27
Plots for Approval • Efficiency (Data and MC) and scale factors for a cut at < 0. 1 for Tracker Relative Isolation vs number vertices • Tn. P method used on Zs • Probes Tight Muons 01/10/12 S. G. L, Ivan Mikulec 28
- Isentropic efficiency of a pump
- Financial efficiencies with captive
- Ecological efficiency
- Projects cannot run in isolation
- Short run equilibrium
- Within run and across run meaning
- Difference between short run and long run economics
- Run lola run themes
- Run lola run editing techniques
- Short run vs long run economics
- Run lola run script
- Brigitta manthey
- Isis neutron and muon source
- Muốn tìm số chia
- đến muôn đời con cảm tạ
- Vì chúa yêu tôi nên tôi theo gót ngài
- Con xin dâng lên muôn lời suy tôn
- Bnl
- Positive muon
- Muon collider
- Ca vang lên nào
- Nhc vng
- Muôn thiên thần cánh trắng
- Cocine
- Mênh mông muôn mẫu một màu mưa
- Xin giấu con nơi cánh tay cha
- Giêsu vua muôn vua
- Muốn tính chu vi hình chữ nhật
- Mn ton