Multidimensional Parallel Column Gas Chromatography P M Owens

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Multidimensional Parallel Column Gas Chromatography P. M. Owens and D. W. Loehle Center for

Multidimensional Parallel Column Gas Chromatography P. M. Owens and D. W. Loehle Center for Molecular Sciences United States Military Academy West Point, NY 10996

Parallel Column GC Systems System 1 5 m, 0. 53 mm HP 1 System

Parallel Column GC Systems System 1 5 m, 0. 53 mm HP 1 System 2 Precolumns 15 m, 0. 50 mm UAC-1 Analytical Columns 10 m, 0. 53 mm HP 1 15 m, 0. 25 mm UAC-1 10 m, 0. 53 mm HP 17 15 m, 0. 25 mm UAC-17 10 m, 0. 53 mm HP 20 M 15 m, 0. 25 mm UAC-CW

Retention Time Equations tm k tr = t m + t m k =

Retention Time Equations tm k tr = t m + t m k = mobile phase hold-up time = partition ratio t’r = tr - tm t’r = adjusted retention time k = (tr - tm) / tm = t’r / tm

Parallel Column Retention Equations Single analyte & 3 columns w / diff. stationary phases

Parallel Column Retention Equations Single analyte & 3 columns w / diff. stationary phases (SP) tr (SP 1) = tm + tm k (SP 1) tr (SP 2) = tm + tm k (SP 2) tr (SP 3) = tm + tm k (SP 3) • The k’s result from specific solutestationary phase interactions and can therefore be used for solute identification

Retention Time Calibration Day 1 t. IS (1) t. AN (1) = = tm

Retention Time Calibration Day 1 t. IS (1) t. AN (1) = = tm 1 + tm 1 k. IS tm 1 + tm 1 k. AN Day 2 t. IS (2) t. AN (2) = = tm 2 + F * tm 2 k. IS tm 2 + F * tm 2 k. AN F corrects for changes in k

Retention Time Adjustment t’AN (2) / t’IS (2) = t’AN (1) / t’IS (1)

Retention Time Adjustment t’AN (2) / t’IS (2) = t’AN (1) / t’IS (1) ( t’ = tr - tm ) Accounts for variations in tm’s Accounts for linear variations in k (F factor)

Relative Retention (a) Libraries a A, IS = t’A (2) / t’IS(2) = t’A

Relative Retention (a) Libraries a A, IS = t’A (2) / t’IS(2) = t’A (1) / t’IS (1) • Generate GC library to tabulate a’s for each compound on all stationary phases • Run int. std. with all analyte & library runs • Since a’s are T-dependent, run all samples with identical temperature programs

Search Algorithms • Sum of a differences Hit Metric = S (a. AN -

Search Algorithms • Sum of a differences Hit Metric = S (a. AN - a. LIB ) SP • Euclidean distance Hit Metric = [1 - S (a. N, AN * a. N, LIB )] SP a. N, AN and a. N, LIB are normalized vectors from set of a’s for each compound

Search Results HP 20 M • Sum of a differences Cyclooctane 1. 85 Cyclooctadiene

Search Results HP 20 M • Sum of a differences Cyclooctane 1. 85 Cyclooctadiene 1. 93 1 -Heptanol 1. 84 • Euclidean Search Cyclooctane 1. 85 Nonanoic Acid 3. 05 Octanoic Acid 2. 71 HP 17 HP 1 1. 77 1. 93 1. 84 1. 46 1. 49 1. 58 1. 77 2. 87 2. 57 1. 46 2. 19

Chromatography Relations KD k b = = = KD = k b Distribution constant

Chromatography Relations KD k b = = = KD = k b Distribution constant Partition ratio Phase ratio (Vg / Vs ) KD depends on three variables: 1) temperature, 2) solute, & 3) stationary phase

Retention & Thermodynamics KD = k b tr = t m + t m

Retention & Thermodynamics KD = k b tr = t m + t m k DG = -RT ln KD DG = DH - T DS ln k + ln b = -DH / R T + DS / R ln k = - DH / R (1 / T) + DS / R - ln b

Retention Prediction Errors (CV) Prediction Used T-progs of 8 o. C/min & 15 o.

Retention Prediction Errors (CV) Prediction Used T-progs of 8 o. C/min & 15 o. C/min Sample (C 7 -C 11) 12 C/min 20 C/min Alkanes (C 8 -C 16) Halogenated Ketones Aldehydes Alkanes (C 9 -C 15) 0. 27% 0. 38% 0. 56% 0. 61% 0. 33% 0. 51% 0. 87% 0. 59% 0. 62% 0. 45%

Predict Retention for Analyte GC conditions Library Compounds Predict Analyte Retention under Lib. GC

Predict Retention for Analyte GC conditions Library Compounds Predict Analyte Retention under Lib. GC Conditions X Single Analyte Chromatogram

Parallel Column Gas Chromatography • Measures interaction on multiple stationary phases - a separate

Parallel Column Gas Chromatography • Measures interaction on multiple stationary phases - a separate dimension of analyte information • Requires the use of internal standards to characterize GC operating conditions • Thermodynamic modeling allows adjustment of library retentions to current operating conditions

Future Areas of Focus • Interinstrument variability assessment • Development of calibration procedures to

Future Areas of Focus • Interinstrument variability assessment • Development of calibration procedures to minimize retention prediction errors • Optimization of stationary phase selection • Evaluation of an increased number of parallel columns • Application for complex mixture analysis

Acknowledgements • Association of Graduates and Army Research Office • Beverly S. Scott &

Acknowledgements • Association of Graduates and Army Research Office • Beverly S. Scott & Rodney S. Gonzalez • Tony Weaver • Department of Chemistry, USMA