MSCBMS interaxis in SSS Study on 32 SSS
![MSCB(MS) inter-axis in SSS Study on 32 SSS of MS magnetic inter-axis and MSCB MSCB(MS) inter-axis in SSS Study on 32 SSS of MS magnetic inter-axis and MSCB](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-1.jpg)
MSCB(MS) inter-axis in SSS Study on 32 SSS of MS magnetic inter-axis and MSCB mechanical inter-axis from measurement made after cold test (WP 18). Acknowledgments Bernard Jeanneret, Arnaud Devred, Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Mikko Karppinen, Elena Wildner 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 1
![What is the situation now? (1/2) • Magnetic inter-axis out of tolerance • Spread What is the situation now? (1/2) • Magnetic inter-axis out of tolerance • Spread](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-2.jpg)
What is the situation now? (1/2) • Magnetic inter-axis out of tolerance • Spread larger for magnetic (+/- 1. 5 mm) than for mechanical (+/- 1 mm). 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 2
![What is the situation now? (2/2) 2 1 For mechanical and magnetic measurement : What is the situation now? (2/2) 2 1 For mechanical and magnetic measurement :](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-3.jpg)
What is the situation now? (2/2) 2 1 For mechanical and magnetic measurement : - quadrant 2 and 4 are mainly filled => inter-axis too large or too small. 3 4 2 1 3 4 25 -MAY-2005 - quadrant 1 and 3 are not much populated => inter-axis well centered. Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS Ap 1 Ap 2 3
![MS correlation mech vs. mag • Good correlation • but correlation factor different of MS correlation mech vs. mag • Good correlation • but correlation factor different of](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-4.jpg)
MS correlation mech vs. mag • Good correlation • but correlation factor different of 1 (around 2) between magnetic and mechanic 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 4
![Mechanical vs magnetic • the factor 2 found for MS may indicate an error Mechanical vs magnetic • the factor 2 found for MS may indicate an error](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-5.jpg)
Mechanical vs magnetic • the factor 2 found for MS may indicate an error in the feed down calculation. • For others magnets in SSS, the same (or nearly) factor is found Þthe previous hypothesis is not checked ÞIt comes from an inversion of sign in the software measurement (see talk of Juan). 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 5
![MS/MSCB --- GEO/AC mole • only few points (1 to 6) measured on the MS/MSCB --- GEO/AC mole • only few points (1 to 6) measured on the](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-6.jpg)
MS/MSCB --- GEO/AC mole • only few points (1 to 6) measured on the MS • MS represent 1/3 of the total length of MSCB assembly. Study on the MSCB good correlation => MS and MCB well aligned one respect to the other one => no artifact from system measurement for mechanical measurement 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 6
![Flanges & MQ inter-axis • NO correlation between MSCB inter-axis and arounding elements (flanges Flanges & MQ inter-axis • NO correlation between MSCB inter-axis and arounding elements (flanges](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-7.jpg)
Flanges & MQ inter-axis • NO correlation between MSCB inter-axis and arounding elements (flanges and MQ) • Spread much larger (3 to 4 times more) for MSCB than for MQ or flanges. • Cold bore tube movement along the SSS. 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 7
![Inter-axis comparison 25 -MAY-2005 mean rms Ap 1 Ap 2 MSCB 0. 003 0. Inter-axis comparison 25 -MAY-2005 mean rms Ap 1 Ap 2 MSCB 0. 003 0.](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-8.jpg)
Inter-axis comparison 25 -MAY-2005 mean rms Ap 1 Ap 2 MSCB 0. 003 0. 004 0. 203 0. 213 MQ -0. 039 -0. 050 0. 082 0. 107 MO/MQT/MQS -0. 009 0. 110 0. 139 0. 186 flanges 0. 048 0. 047 0. 216 0. 188 BPM support -0. 129 -0. 033 0. 172 0. 193 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 8
![Conclusions • Magnetic measurement have to be rejected. Þ Database have to be updated Conclusions • Magnetic measurement have to be rejected. Þ Database have to be updated](http://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/703511df534875dffdd2c849fa7d7f11/image-9.jpg)
Conclusions • Magnetic measurement have to be rejected. Þ Database have to be updated Þ Id Cards and/or slot allocation update ? • Mechanical measurement also? • Final tolerance after MSCB assembly completion for transversal misalignment for 1 aperture is 0. 23 mm. • Most (all? ) of MSCB’s module are in tolerance after assembly in Tesla. • Cold bore tube movement : – What are tolerances on CBT undulation? – Deformation of CBT during his insertion in SSS? • Other issue : study of location of maximum delta X along SSS axis. 25 -MAY-2005 Jerome Beauquis AT-MAS 9
- Slides: 9