MPORPO Safety Performance Measures Performance Management Why Who

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
MPO/RPO Safety Performance Measures

MPO/RPO Safety Performance Measures

Performance Management – Why & Who • As part of the Moving Ahead for

Performance Management – Why & Who • As part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) a federal rule making (23 CFR 490) was established to enact national performance management requirements to ensure that State DOTs and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) choose the most efficient investments for Federal transportation funds.

Performance Management – When & Where • Safety Performance Management Final Rule first published

Performance Management – When & Where • Safety Performance Management Final Rule first published to Federal Register March 15, 2016 – 23 CFR Part 924 updated Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) – 23 CRF Part 490 added National Performance Management Measures for Safety

Performance Management - What To address this 5 performance measures to assess performance and

Performance Management - What To address this 5 performance measures to assess performance and carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program were established: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Number of fatalities Rate of fatalities per 100 Million VMT Number of serious injuries Rate of serious injuries per 100 Million VMT Number of combined non-motorized fatalities and nonmotorized serious injuries

2017 Strategic Highway Safety Plan • The goal established in the SHSP was to

2017 Strategic Highway Safety Plan • The goal established in the SHSP was to reduce fatalities and serious injuries by 2% annually • This would result in a PA specific SHSP goal to reduce 120 fatalities and 305 serious injuries over 5 years http: //www. penndot. gov/Travel. In. PA/Safety/Documents/ PA%20 SHSP%202017 -0215%20(HRRR%20 Errata). pdf

Considerations for Performance Goal • Nationally there was an increase of over 7% in

Considerations for Performance Goal • Nationally there was an increase of over 7% in each of the last two years • Toward Zero Deaths Vision sets a national aspirational goal to eliminate fatalities • National goal established by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to eliminate fatalities in 30 years • Autonomous vehicles will become more evolved between 2025 and 2030 but the impacts remain unknown

Considerations for Performance Goal • PA data has shown a 1% fatality reduction based

Considerations for Performance Goal • PA data has shown a 1% fatality reduction based on historical state data • Based on all these considerations a 2% reduction goal was established to continue to push numbers downward to support national goals. The Department felt this was a stretch goal but still obtainable based on PA’s current data.

Recent PA Trends 3, 605 3, 693 3, 556 3, 432 3, 434 3,

Recent PA Trends 3, 605 3, 693 3, 556 3, 432 3, 434 3, 340 3, 800 * 3, 600 3, 400 3, 235 1, 300 3, 200 3, 000 2, 800 2, 600 1, 178 1, 191 1, 220 1, 240 1, 150 1, 265 1, 277 1, 200 1, 329 1, 365 1, 250 2, 200 8 2, 000 2 0 1 4 -2 0 1 -2 0 3 0 1 2 2, 400 1 7 6 1 0 -2 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 -2 -2 0 0 1 1 5 4 3 1 0 -2 9 0 2 0 -2 8 0 2 0 0 7 -2 0 0 1 1 2 1 1, 100 2 0 Fatalities 1, 350 4, 000 5 -year Average Fatalities 5 -year Average Fatality Goals 5 -year Average Serious Injuries 5 -year Average Serious Injury Goals * Definition change occurred for serious injuries Serious Injuries 1, 400 3, 800

Serious Injury Definition • Agencies must use the definition for "Suspected Serious Injury (A)"

Serious Injury Definition • Agencies must use the definition for "Suspected Serious Injury (A)" from the MMUCC, 4 th edition by April 15, 2019. • Pennsylvania converted to this definition in January of 2016. • This conversion resulted in approximately 1, 000 more suspected serious injuries than we previously had major injuries. • As a result, the targets for serious injuries and serious injury rate will appear to be going up for the next 4 years even though we are targeting a 2% reduction annually.

Performance Management - Statewide 5 -year Rolling Averages Performance Measure Number of Fatalities TARGET

Performance Management - Statewide 5 -year Rolling Averages Performance Measure Number of Fatalities TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE 2014 -2018 2012 -2016 1, 177. 6 1, 220. 2 1. 161 1. 220 3, 799. 8 3, 434. 0 Serious Injury Rate 3. 746 3. 433 Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 654. 4 602. 4 Fatality Rate Number of Serious Injuries For each of the 5 measures the State will be using a 2% annual reduction as our target.

Performance Management – Northwest RPO 5 -year Rolling Averages Performance Measure TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE

Performance Management – Northwest RPO 5 -year Rolling Averages Performance Measure TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE 2014 -2018 2012 -2016 Number of Fatalities 30. 6 37. 6 Fatality Rate Number of Serious Injuries 1. 17 1. 416 105. 0 100. 8 Serious Injury Rate 4. 014 3. 828 Number of Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 11. 1 9. 4 For planning purposes the RPO should consider the above values to support the State in meeting the 2% annual reduction target.

Performance Management - When Penn. DOT targets established Aug. 31, 2017 MPO/RPOs establish targets

Performance Management - When Penn. DOT targets established Aug. 31, 2017 MPO/RPOs establish targets or support Penn. DOT targets by Feb. 28, 2018

Performance Management - When

Performance Management - When

Performance Management - When Language being developed to help describe how STIP/TIP contributes to

Performance Management - When Language being developed to help describe how STIP/TIP contributes to achieving performance targets

Supporting Links • FHWA Safety Performance Management Fact Sheet • FHWA Metropolitan Planning Organization

Supporting Links • FHWA Safety Performance Management Fact Sheet • FHWA Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet • 2017 Pennsylvania Strategic Highway Safety Plan

Questions

Questions