Minimally invasive surgery for congenital heart defects in

  • Slides: 7
Download presentation
Minimally invasive surgery for congenital heart defects in pediatric patients: Technique and results from

Minimally invasive surgery for congenital heart defects in pediatric patients: Technique and results from an initial experience Calle Valda CM. , Boni L. , García Torres E. , Arias Dachary FJ. , Melo M. , Cano Novillo I. , García Vázquez A. PC 70

BACKGROUND • Minimally invasive approaches in congenital heart surgery have gained popularity and have

BACKGROUND • Minimally invasive approaches in congenital heart surgery have gained popularity and have been associated with better outcomes. • The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience in starting a new program on minimally invasive pediatric cardiac surgery.

METHODS • Retrospective, observational, cohort study from 17 patients undergoing by minimally invasive heart

METHODS • Retrospective, observational, cohort study from 17 patients undergoing by minimally invasive heart surgery. • Three different approaches: ü Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy (LRAT) (n=7) ü Upper-ministernotomy (U-MS) (n=3) ü Left thoracoscopy (LTS) (n=7) February 2014 October 2019

RESULTS • The average was 6. 0 ± 4. 5 years (range: 2 months–

RESULTS • The average was 6. 0 ± 4. 5 years (range: 2 months– 16. 4 years). The average weight was 24. 3± 17. 1 kg (range: 7. 7 - 66 Kg). • The corrected defects included: Ø Secundum atrial septal defect (pericardial patch closure= 4 and direct suturing =2) Ø Aaortic valve replacement (n=2) Ø Vascular ring division (n=5) Ø Excision of interventricular septum tumor (1) Ø Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation (ECMO) (n=1), Ø Permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1) Ø Pleural pericardial window (n=1)

Procedure OS atrial septal defect closure Aortic valve replacement Vascular ring division Excision of

Procedure OS atrial septal defect closure Aortic valve replacement Vascular ring division Excision of interventricular septum tumor Veno-arterial ECMO Permanent pacemaker implantation Pleural pericardial window Total Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy 6 - Upperministernotomy Left thoracoscopy 2 1 - 5 - - 1 7 3 1 7 Table 1. Relationship between approach and procedure along the study period

RESULTS • The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 65. 9 ± 27. 2 min

RESULTS • The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 65. 9 ± 27. 2 min (range 27 - 114 min) and the mean aortic crossclamping time was 39. 4 ± 26. 3 min (range 14 94 min) in LRAT and U-MS groups. • There were no perioperative complications, with the exception of one case with mild left subcutaneous emphysema in the LTS group. • Mean ICU stay and hospital stay were 1. 1± 0. 4 days and 3. 1± 0. 9 days, respectively. • We had zero surgical mortality. The aesthetic results were excellent. Follow-up (mean 28. 2 ± 17. 9 months) was uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS • We believe that minimally invasive surgery is a safe and effective alternative

CONCLUSIONS • We believe that minimally invasive surgery is a safe and effective alternative to a traditional sternotomy for correction of congenital heart defects. • Advantages of this approach include less injury, maintaining the continuity and the integrity of the bony thorax, benefits of improved cosmesis, reduced post-operative pain, shorter length of stay, and faster return to activity.