Micro Pot Prototype Work in Progress Jaak Lippmaa

  • Slides: 8
Download presentation
Micro. Pot Prototype Work in Progress Jaak Lippmaa Helsinki Group, Helsinki Institute of Physics,

Micro. Pot Prototype Work in Progress Jaak Lippmaa Helsinki Group, Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki CERN, February, 2006 1

Manchester Criteria • Detectors are in secondary vacuum • Access to detectors and/or positioning

Manchester Criteria • Detectors are in secondary vacuum • Access to detectors and/or positioning mechanics without interrupting LHC • Minimum number of degrees of freedom (should reduce mechanical jamming risk) • At least 5 micron positioning accuracy • Bake without detectors installed • Transfer cryostat Modification 3 (Sebastien’s prposal) CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 2

Mechanical Considerations • Very limited space available around beam pipes • Accurate distances not

Mechanical Considerations • Very limited space available around beam pipes • Accurate distances not known • Virtually no room outside the transfer cryostat • Mechanical support structure not clear • Primary vacuum cannot be broken once the pot is installed CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 3

Manchester Proposal – Tilted Pot Proton Beam Emergency Stops Tilt 13º Stepper Motor Bellows

Manchester Proposal – Tilted Pot Proton Beam Emergency Stops Tilt 13º Stepper Motor Bellows Outer Weld Points Beam Pipe Flange Primary Vacuum Detector Det ecto rm ove men t Secondary Vacuum CERN 15 February 2006 CWT (optional) Rest Stops Micro. Pot Prototype Feedthroughs Jaak Lippmaa 4

Roadmap to Successful Prototype • Design criteria – maximum use of COTS components •

Roadmap to Successful Prototype • Design criteria – maximum use of COTS components • Prototype basic design ready in March • Components ordered in April/May • Prototype building in June • Beamtest at FNAL in July/August • Plans for Prototype II CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 5

We we are at the moment • Several alternative designs were considered (vertical, horizontal,

We we are at the moment • Several alternative designs were considered (vertical, horizontal, tilted. . . ) • Rigidity is a major concern • Smoothness of movement is a concern • Possible damage to positioning mechanism during emergency stops • Vacuum force compensation • Cooling of detectors needs to be decided • There is at least 30 mm (z-axis) for detectors • We need the detector module weight to calculate cantilever loads to the slider • We need urgently the number of leads for feedthroughs CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 6

Status • Detectors in secondary vacuum, slider in air, primary vacuum shielded prototype •

Status • Detectors in secondary vacuum, slider in air, primary vacuum shielded prototype • Manufacturers of COTS components have been identified • Negotiations for pricing and detailed specs have started • Design is being reviewed for overall mechanical stability and rigidity • COTS component compatibility review is about to start • Component list does not rule out alternative designs • Co-operation with UTA confirmed CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 7

CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 8

CERN 15 February 2006 Micro. Pot Prototype Jaak Lippmaa 8