Metode Riset Akuntansi Measurement and Sampling Measurement l

  • Slides: 63
Download presentation
Metode Riset Akuntansi Measurement and Sampling

Metode Riset Akuntansi Measurement and Sampling

Measurement l Measurement in research consists of assigning numbers to empirical events, objects, or

Measurement l Measurement in research consists of assigning numbers to empirical events, objects, or properties, or activities in compliance with a set of rules

Measurement Selecting measurable phenomena Developing a set of mapping rules Applying the mapping rule

Measurement Selecting measurable phenomena Developing a set of mapping rules Applying the mapping rule to each phenomenon

Measurement Scales l Several types of measurement are possible l l Depends on what

Measurement Scales l Several types of measurement are possible l l Depends on what you assume about mapping rule Mapping rules have four characteristics: Classification l Order l Distance l Origin l

Types of Scales Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio

Types of Scales Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio

Levels of Measurement Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio Classification

Levels of Measurement Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio Classification

Levels of Measurement Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio Classification Order

Levels of Measurement Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio Classification Order

Levels of Measurement Nominal Classification Order Interval Classification Order Ratio Distance

Levels of Measurement Nominal Classification Order Interval Classification Order Ratio Distance

Levels of Measurement Nominal Classification Order Interval Classification Order Distance Ratio Classification Order Distance

Levels of Measurement Nominal Classification Order Interval Classification Order Distance Ratio Classification Order Distance Natural Origin

Sources of Error Respondent Situation Measurer Instrument

Sources of Error Respondent Situation Measurer Instrument

Evaluating Measurement Tools Validity Criteria Practicality Reliability

Evaluating Measurement Tools Validity Criteria Practicality Reliability

Evaluating Measurement Tools Validity is the extent to which a test measures what we

Evaluating Measurement Tools Validity is the extent to which a test measures what we actually wish to measure l Reliability has to do with the accuracy and precision of a measurement procedure l Practicality is concerned with a wide range of factors of economy, convenience, and interpretability l

Validity l Two major forms: External validity: data’s ability to be generalized l Internal

Validity l Two major forms: External validity: data’s ability to be generalized l Internal validity: the ability of a research instrument to measure what it is purported to measure l

Validity Determinants Content Criterion Construct

Validity Determinants Content Criterion Construct

Content Validity l The extent to which it provides adequate coverage of the investigative

Content Validity l The extent to which it provides adequate coverage of the investigative questions guiding the study

Increasing Content Validity Literature Search Content Expert Interviews Group Interviews

Increasing Content Validity Literature Search Content Expert Interviews Group Interviews

Validity Determinants Content Construct

Validity Determinants Content Construct

Construct Validity l Consider both theory and the measuring instrument being used

Construct Validity l Consider both theory and the measuring instrument being used

Validity Determinants Content Criterion Construct

Validity Determinants Content Criterion Construct

Criterion-Related Validity l Reflects the success of measures used for prediction or estimation

Criterion-Related Validity l Reflects the success of measures used for prediction or estimation

Understanding Validity and Reliability

Understanding Validity and Reliability

Reliability Estimates Stability Internal Consistency Equivalence

Reliability Estimates Stability Internal Consistency Equivalence

Practicality Economy Convenience Interpretability

Practicality Economy Convenience Interpretability

Methods of Scaling l Rating scales l l Have several response categories and are

Methods of Scaling l Rating scales l l Have several response categories and are used to elicit responses with regard to the object, event, or person studied. Ranking scales l Make comparisons between or among objects, events, persons and elicit the preferred choices and ranking among them.

Simple Category/Dichotomous Scale I plan to purchase a Mind. Writer laptop in the 12

Simple Category/Dichotomous Scale I plan to purchase a Mind. Writer laptop in the 12 months. q. Yes q. No Nominal Data

Multiple-Choice, Single Response Scale What newspaper do you read most often for financial news?

Multiple-Choice, Single Response Scale What newspaper do you read most often for financial news? q. East City Gazette q. West City Tribune q. Regional newspaper q. National newspaper q. Other (specify: _______) Nominal Data

Multiple-Choice, Multiple Response Scale What sources did you use when designing your new home?

Multiple-Choice, Multiple Response Scale What sources did you use when designing your new home? Please check all that apply. q. Online planning services q. Magazines q. Independent contractor/builder q. Designer q. Architect q. Other (specify: _______) Nominal Data

Likert Scale The Internet is superior to traditional libraries for comprehensive searches. q. Strongly

Likert Scale The Internet is superior to traditional libraries for comprehensive searches. q. Strongly disagree q. Disagree q. Neither agree nor disagree q. Agree q. Strongly agree Interval Data

Semantic Differential Interval Data

Semantic Differential Interval Data

Numerical Scale Ordinal or Interval Data

Numerical Scale Ordinal or Interval Data

Multiple Rating List Scales Interval Data

Multiple Rating List Scales Interval Data

Stapel Scales Interval Data

Stapel Scales Interval Data

Constant-Sum Scales Interval Data

Constant-Sum Scales Interval Data

Graphic Rating Scales Interval Data

Graphic Rating Scales Interval Data

Ranking Scales l l l Paired-comparison scale Forced ranking scale Comparative scale

Ranking Scales l l l Paired-comparison scale Forced ranking scale Comparative scale

Paired-Comparison Scale Ordinal Data

Paired-Comparison Scale Ordinal Data

Forced Ranking Scale Ordinal Data

Forced Ranking Scale Ordinal Data

Comparative Scale Ordinal or Interval Data

Comparative Scale Ordinal or Interval Data

The Nature of Sampling l The basic idea of sampling is that by selecting

The Nature of Sampling l The basic idea of sampling is that by selecting some of the elements in a population, we may draw conclusions about the entire population

The Nature of Sampling l l Population element: the individual participant or object on

The Nature of Sampling l l Population element: the individual participant or object on which the measurement is taken Population: total collection of elements about which we wish to make some inferences Census: a count of all the elements in a population Sample frame: listing of all population elements from which the sample will be drawn

Why Sample? Availability of elements Greater speed Lower cost Sampling provides Greater accuracy

Why Sample? Availability of elements Greater speed Lower cost Sampling provides Greater accuracy

What Is A Good Sample? Accuracy Precision

What Is A Good Sample? Accuracy Precision

Accuracy l Accuracy is the degree to which bias is absent from the sample

Accuracy l Accuracy is the degree to which bias is absent from the sample Systematic variance l Increasing the sample size l

Precision l A measure of how closely the sample represents the population l Measured

Precision l A measure of how closely the sample represents the population l Measured by the standard error of estimate

Sampling Designs l Probability sampling l l Elements in the population have some known

Sampling Designs l Probability sampling l l Elements in the population have some known chance or probability of being selected as sample subjects Nonprobability sampling l Elements do not have known or predetermined chance of being selected as subjects

Types of Sampling Designs Element Selection Unrestricted Probability Nonprobability Simple random Convenience Restricted Complex

Types of Sampling Designs Element Selection Unrestricted Probability Nonprobability Simple random Convenience Restricted Complex random Purposive Systematic Judgment Cluster Quota Stratified Double Snowball

Simple Random l Purest form of probability sampling

Simple Random l Purest form of probability sampling

Simple Random Advantages l Easy to implement Disadvantages l Requires list of population elements

Simple Random Advantages l Easy to implement Disadvantages l Requires list of population elements l Time consuming l Can require larger sample sizes

Systematic l Every kth element in the population is sampled, beginning with a random

Systematic l Every kth element in the population is sampled, beginning with a random start of an element in the range of 1 to k

Systematic Advantages l Simple to design l Easier than simple random Disadvantages l Periodicity

Systematic Advantages l Simple to design l Easier than simple random Disadvantages l Periodicity within population may skew sample and results l Trends in list may bias results

Stratified l The process by which the sample is constrained to include elements from

Stratified l The process by which the sample is constrained to include elements from each of the segments

Stratified Advantages l Increased statistical efficiency l Provides data to represent and analyze subgroups

Stratified Advantages l Increased statistical efficiency l Provides data to represent and analyze subgroups l Enables use of different methods in strata Disadvantages l Especially expensive if strata on population must be created

Stratified Proportionate: sample drawn from the stratum is proportionate to the stratum’s share of

Stratified Proportionate: sample drawn from the stratum is proportionate to the stratum’s share of the total population l Disproportionate l

Cluster Advantages l Economically more efficient than simple random l Easy to do without

Cluster Advantages l Economically more efficient than simple random l Easy to do without list Disadvantages l Often lower statistical efficiency due to subgroups being homogeneous rather than heterogeneous

Stratified and Cluster Sampling Stratified l Population divided into few subgroups l Homogeneity within

Stratified and Cluster Sampling Stratified l Population divided into few subgroups l Homogeneity within subgroups l Heterogeneity between subgroups l Choice of elements from within each subgroup Cluster l Population divided into many subgroups l Heterogeneity within subgroups l Homogeneity between subgroups l Random choice of subgroups

Area Sampling

Area Sampling

Double l It may be more convenient or economical to collect some information by

Double l It may be more convenient or economical to collect some information by sample and then use this information as the basis for selecting a subsample for further study

Double Advantages l May reduce costs if first stage results in enough data to

Double Advantages l May reduce costs if first stage results in enough data to stratify or cluster the population Disadvantages l Increased costs if discriminately used

Nonprobability Sampling No need to generalize Limited objectives Feasibility Issues Time Cost

Nonprobability Sampling No need to generalize Limited objectives Feasibility Issues Time Cost

Nonprobability Sampling Methods Convenience Judgment Quota Snowball

Nonprobability Sampling Methods Convenience Judgment Quota Snowball

Convenience l Collection of information from members of the population who are conveniently available

Convenience l Collection of information from members of the population who are conveniently available to provide it

Purposive l Conform to some criteria set by the researcher Judgment sampling l Quota

Purposive l Conform to some criteria set by the researcher Judgment sampling l Quota sampling l

Snowball l Individuals are discovered and this group is then used to refer the

Snowball l Individuals are discovered and this group is then used to refer the researcher to others that possess similar characteristics and who, in turn, will identify others