Meta-Analysis § Why meta-analysis § Heterogeneity of the studies § Fixed effect methods for combining study estimate § Random effect methods for combining study estimate § Sensitivity analysis § Presenting the results of a meta-analysis
study n d s Var (d) 95% CI 1 17/20 0. 28 10. 59 0. 11 -0. 37 to 0. 93 2 39/40 -0. 81 16. 18 0. 05 -1. 27 to -0. 35 3 15/15 -0. 9 8. 86 0. 15 -1. 65 to -0. 15 126/139 -0. 85 12. 49 0. 02 -1. 1 to -0. 59 . . . 9.
Due to heterogenicity, we do Meta-Analysis § Heterogenicity § Chi-square test: p<0. 05 異質性過高 個別分析, 評估 異質性來源 § Chi-square test: p>0. 05 進入 meta-analysis § 異質程度: I 2=(Q-df)/Q x 100% (df=study numbmer -1) low: <=0. 2; middle: 0. 2 -0. 5; high: >0. 5 § 但書: § 10篇studies以下, 改 用 0. 1當 cutpoint
§ P-value § >=0. 5 § for heterogenicity Fixed-effect model 0. 05 -0. 5 Random-effect model § <0. 05 評估異質性來源
§ Fixed-effect model: the between groups variance is ignored; only with-in study variance is considered § Random-effect model: consider both the between- and with-study variation; 較保守 策略 § Relative weight of study: 在random-effect model中, 小型study權重相對提高.
Example
Forest plot
P=0. 065 random effect
Subgroup analysis
Male
Female
Publication bias: Funnel plot
Egger’s test Egger et al. (1997) proposed a test for asymmetry of the funnel plot. This is a test for the Y intercept = 0 from a linear regression of normalized effect estimate (estimate divided by its standard error) against precision (reciprocal of the standard error of the estimate). Stats. Direct provides this bias indicator method with all meta-analyses. Please note that the power of this method to detect bias will be low with small numbers of studies. 檢測 intercept是否為” 0”
Sensitivity analysis § Sensitivity of results of inclusion of criteria: § delete some study § Sensitivity of results to meta-analysis methods (different weighting) § Weighting method
Log scale
其他 8個studies 9 個 studies
Sensitivity test
Summary § Abstract § Background § Hypothesis § Review methods § Details of studies included § Details of studies excluded § Results of the review § Analysis of the robustness of the results: sensitivity test § Discussion: included publication bias