Mesoscale Convective Systems Recent Observational and Diagnostic Studies
Mesoscale Convective Systems: Recent Observational and Diagnostic Studies Robert Houze Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington 10 th Conf. on Mesoscale Meteorology, Portland, OR, June 23 -27 2003
DEFINITION Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) A cumulonimbus cloud system that produces a contiguous precipitation area ~100 km or more in at least one direction
Questions Why do tropical and midlatitude MCSs look different? Does layer lifting occur in a mature MCS? Is rear inflow really from the rear? What controls the size of MCSs? What controls the movement of MCSs?
Radar reflectivity Houze et al. 1989, 1990 Tropical & midlatitudes “Symmetric” Midlatitudes (later stages) “Asymmetric” Strat. Conv.
Skamarock et al. 1994 No Coriolis Symmetric (Tropics & midlatitudes) Asymmetric (Midlatitudes)
Questions Why do tropical and midlatitude MCSs look different? Does layer lifting occur in a mature MCS? Is rear inflow really from the rear? What controls the size of MCSs? What controls the movement of MCSs?
Parcel viewpoint Zipser 1977 Crossover Zone
Layer viewpoint: Bryan and Fritsch 2000 MAUL “Slab” or Layer Overturning
Layer viewpoint: Kingsmill & Houze 1999 TOGA COARE Airborne Doppler Observations of MCSs Convective region flights Note! 0. 5 -4. 5 km
Moncrieff & Klinker 1997 A B TOGA COARE convection in a GCM with ~80 km resolution 1000 km plan view 1000 km cross section A B
Pandya & Durran 1996 Mean heating in convective line Horizontal wind gravity wave response to heating
Questions Why do tropical and midlatitude MCSs look different? Does layer lifting occur in a mature MCS? Is rear inflow really from the rear? What controls the size of MCSs? What controls the movement of MCSs?
Diversity of stratiform structure: Parker & Johnson 2000 PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION OF STRATIFORM PRECIPITATION IN MIDLATITUDE SQUALL LINES
Kingsmill & Houze 1999 Documented airflow shown by airborne Doppler in TOGA COARE MCSs Stratiform region flights 0°C
JASMINE: Ship radar, Bay of Bengal, 22 May 1999 11 Height (km) Refl. 0 0 11 Horizontal Distance (km) 192 Reflectivity 1. 5 km level 100 km Height (km) Radial Velocity 0 0 Horizontal Distance (km) 192 Radial Velocity 3. 5 km level 90 km
JASMINE: Ship radar, Bay of Bengal, 22 May 1999 12 Height (km) Refl. 0 0 12 Horizontal Distance (km) 192 Reflectivity 1. 5 km level 100 km Height (km) Radial Velocity 0 0 Horizontal Distance (km) 192 Radial Velocity 3. 5 km level 90 km
Questions Why do tropical and midlatitude MCSs look different? Does layer lifting occur in a mature MCS? Is rear inflow really from the rear? What controls the size of MCSs? What controls the movement of MCSs?
Sizes of MCSs observed in TOGA COARE “Super Convective Systems” (SCS) Chen et al. 1996
Yuter & Houze 1998 Percent of 24 km square grid covered by A/C radar echo in all the MCS All TOGA COARE satellite/radar comparisons Precipitation % Convective % Stratiform %
Yuter & Houze 1998 Percent of 240 km square covered by A/C radar echo in all the MCS All TOGA COARE satellite/radar comparisons
Hypothesis: The size of the MCS is determined by the environment’s ability to sustain an ensemble of convection over time. Question: What factors control and limit sustainability?
Height (m) Kingsmill & Houze 1999: TOGA COARE a/c soundings
Schumacher & Houze 2003 TRMM Precipitation radar: % of 2. 5 deg grid covered by stratiform radar echo Annual Average Stratiform Rain Fraction Inference: Sustainability promoted by moist boundary layer that is not interrupted by the diurnal cycle
Questions Why do tropical and midlatitude MCSs look different? Does layer lifting occur in a mature MCS? Is rear inflow really from the rear? What controls the size of MCSs? What controls the movement of MCSs?
Traditional view: Cold pool dynamics Recent studies: Waves in environment
IN TOGA COARE MCSs moved Chen, Houze, & Mapes 1996 individually with wave much of the time Analyzed IR data 3°N-10°S 208°K threshold Time (day) 12 13 14 15 Longitude A/C flights on 12 -14 Dec
JASMINE: May 1999 40 N NOAA Ship R. H. Brown equator 60 E 100 E
Webster et al. 2002 IR over Bay of Bengal during JASMINE Ship track 5 10 15 20 May 1999 25 30
Mapes et al. (2002) West Coast of South Am. Gravity Wave hypothesis
JASMINE MCS
JASMINE MCS
Conclusions Coriolis effect explains why midlatitude MCSs exhibit late -stage asymmetry not observed in the tropics. Layer lifting occurs in mature MCSs, possibly as a gravity wave response to the net heating in the convective region. Midlevel inflow enters stratiform regions from various directions—controlled by environment wind. Max size of MCSs related to sustainability of low-level moist inflow—get biggest systems over oceans and with LLJs Movement of an individual MCS may be in part determined by waves propagating through the environment—gravity waves, inertio-gravity waves, …
Layer viewpoint: Mechem, Houze, & Chen 2002 14 TOGA COARE 23 Dec 92 12 10 Z (km) 150 Y (km) 100 8 6 4 50 2 150 200 X (km) 250 0 150 200 X (km) 250
Yuter & Houze 1998 Convective echo % of grid CS map Stratiform echo Mean IR temp (K) Satellite IR % of grid y (km) x (km)
Nakazawa 1988 INTRASEASONAL ENSEMBLE VARIATION SUB-ENSEMBLE MESOSCALE CONVECTIVE SYSTEM
JASMINE IR sequence (courtesy P. Zuidema)
Serra & Houze 2002 TEPPS—East Pacific ITCZ Ship radar data Easterly wave and cold pool propagation hard to distinguish
Carbone et al. 2002 WSR 88 -D radar data over U. S. in time/ longitude format
Examples of TOGA COARE MCSs Satellite IR overlaid with A/C radar 240 km
- Slides: 40