Merlin EPU Support and Drive System Design Review

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Merlin EPU Support and Drive System Design Review Steve Marks Mark Coleman 4/26/06

Merlin EPU Support and Drive System Design Review Steve Marks Mark Coleman 4/26/06

Scope of Review - Mechanical System • Frame – Deflection • Bearings and Mounts

Scope of Review - Mechanical System • Frame – Deflection • Bearings and Mounts – Deflection – Load Rating • Drive Screws – Load Rating • Backing Beams • Motor Torques

Other Reviews • • Magnetic structure – 2/2/06 Motor Control System – TBD? Sector

Other Reviews • • Magnetic structure – 2/2/06 Motor Control System – TBD? Sector 4 EPBI – TBD APRP – Scope – Installation Readiness

EPU 90 vs. EPU 50 (old) EPU 90 (new)

EPU 90 vs. EPU 50 (old) EPU 90 (new)

EPU 90 vs. EPU 50 (old) EPU 90 (new)

EPU 90 vs. EPU 50 (old) EPU 90 (new)

What is New? • 90 mm Period (three previous EPUs are 50 mm) •

What is New? • 90 mm Period (three previous EPUs are 50 mm) • Separate mounting of block/keepers – Avoid correlated motion causing shift dependent skew quad • Modified backing beam – Bearings closer to load – Horizontal drive closer to load – Steel backing beam • Stiffer Frame – To accommodate ~ 2. 3 vertical load • Mount encoder directly to backing beams • Harmonic drive coupling on vertical screws for taper adjustment • Modified gear ratio for horizontal drive

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

EPU 90

Vertical Drive • Drive Screws: – Max. load per screw = 17 k. N

Vertical Drive • Drive Screws: – Max. load per screw = 17 k. N – Static load rating = 107 k. N (static), – Mean load ~ 10 k. N – Dynamic load rating = 27 k. N (dynamic) • Linear Roller Bearings – Moment load = 2. 7 k. N-m – Rating = 7. 2 k. N-m

Vertical Drive • Torque/speed – Max torque = 1. 2 N-m – Max speed

Vertical Drive • Torque/speed – Max torque = 1. 2 N-m – Max speed = 1500 RPM • Motor rating (with EPU 50 motor) – Cont. Stall Torque = 3. 9 N-m – Rated speed = 1500 RPM

Deformation due to Vertical Load

Deformation due to Vertical Load

Vertical Drive • Drive screw mounting is over constrained affected by deflection of frame

Vertical Drive • Drive screw mounting is over constrained affected by deflection of frame and bearing mounts. • EPU 90 vs. EPU 50 Scaling Comparison: – Vertical columns: • Vertical load: F 90/F 50 = 2. 3 • Frame column stiffness: I 90/I 50 = 6. 5 • Deflection: 90/ 50 = 0. 35 – Duplex bearing mounts • • Moment: M 90/M 50 = 1. 9 Stiffness: I 90/I 50 = 2. 0 Length: L 90/L 50 = 0. 8 Deflection: 90/ 50 = 0. 67

Backing Beam Deflection

Backing Beam Deflection

Backing Beam / Horizontal Drive Deflection Test Setup

Backing Beam / Horizontal Drive Deflection Test Setup

Backing Beam / Horizontal Drive • Cross Roller Bearings: – Load per roller =

Backing Beam / Horizontal Drive • Cross Roller Bearings: – Load per roller = 1. 0 k. N – Bearing load rating = 3. 9 k. N • Torque/Speed with 5/1 gear ratio (3/1 on EPU 50): – Max. torque = 2. 1 N-m – Motor rating (using same motor as EPU 50): • Cont. Stall Torque = 3. 9 N-m • Speed limit = 900 RPM vmax = 10 mm/sec (~10 secs. to switch polarization)

Procurement/Fabrication Plan • Proceed with procurement of drive screws (long lead – critical path

Procurement/Fabrication Plan • Proceed with procurement of drive screws (long lead – critical path on schedule) • Initiate fabrication of backing beams, frame, etc. • Proceed with control system procurement after control system discussion/review