MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. What’s wrong with this statement? Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s that simple. Click to see an analysis

PREVIOUS MENU Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. This statement allows only two options while in fact there are many alternatives that would allow the parks to remain open. The statement is too extreme to seem reasonable. Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s that simple. Next EXIT

MENU Logical Fallacies Common logical fallacies include the following. Click to choose the fallacy you want to explore. MENU • • • Overgeneralization Circular reasoning False analogy Either/or reasoning Single cause False cause EXIT

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. What is the overgeneralization in this sentence? Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. Click to see the overgeneralization

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. What is the overgeneralization in this sentence? Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. Click to see a revision

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. ORIGINAL Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. REVISED Many people love the Weird Cats’ new song. Menu

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. What is the repeated idea in this sentence? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. Click to see the repeated idea

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. What is the repeated idea in this sentence? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. How would you revise to avoid this circular reasoning? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. Click to see a revision

PREVIOUS MENU Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. EXIT

PREVIOUS MENU Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to EXIT

PREVIOUS MENU Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to maintain the diversity of animal life. EXIT

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. This revised sentence gives a specific reason why endangered animals should be protected: to maintain the diversity of animal life. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to maintain the diversity of animal life. Menu

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. What is wrong with this comparison? Using a computer without training is like driving a car without a license. Click to see an analysis

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. This argument compares using a computer with driving a car. The two activities do not compare in terms of the consequences of lack of training. Using a computer without training is like driving a car without a license. Menu

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. What other possibilities can you imagine for this example? Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. Click to see an analysis

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. The economy may not thrive as it would with a new airport, but it will probably not die. Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. Click to see a revision

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. This revision removes the limited options and presents a more reasonable statement. ORIGINAL Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. REVISED Building a new airport will help our local economy grow. Menu

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there actually multiple causes. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there actually multiple causes. Can you think of other possible reasons why the team might be terrible? Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible. Click to see a revision

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there actually multiple causes. ORIGINAL Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible. REVISED Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible, and too many of our players lack the skills to compete in this league. Menu

MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. Continue…

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. Are these two events actually connected? The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. Click to see an analysis

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. Although it’s reasonable to assume the warships were sent in response to the Declaration of Independence, news of the event didn’t travel that fast. The ships were underway on their mission to attack New York well before July 4. The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. Click to see a revision

PREVIOUS MENU EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. ORIGINAL The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. REVISED The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, but the British had already decided to attack New York Harbor. The warships arrived on July 12. Menu