MENISCAL ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANTATION MAT Preliminary results Clinical protocol

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation

MENISCAL ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANTATION (MAT) "“Preliminary results. Clinical protocol” Drs. J. D. Ayala Mejías, 1

MENISCAL ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANTATION (MAT) "“Preliminary results. Clinical protocol” Drs. J. D. Ayala Mejías, 1 L. Alcocer, 1 A. Estévez, 2 R. Canosa, 3 C. Gavín, 3 C. Vidal 4 1. Hospital Monográfico de Traumatología, Cirugía Ortopédica y Rehabilitación. ASEPEYO. Coslada, Madrid. 2. Clínica Nuestra Sra. de América. Madrid. 3. Hospital Fundación Alcorcón. Madrid. 4. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid.

“GRUPO DE ESTUDIO DE MADRID” PROTOCOL Drs. Luis Alcocer, Juan Ayala Mejías (Hospital Monográfico

“GRUPO DE ESTUDIO DE MADRID” PROTOCOL Drs. Luis Alcocer, Juan Ayala Mejías (Hospital Monográfico de Traumatología, Cirugía Ortopédica y Rehabilitación. ASEPEYO. Madrid) Canosa R, Gavín C. (Fundación Hospital Alcorcón) Estévez A. (Clínica N. S. de América) Vidal C. (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre)

PREOPERATIVE PROTOCOL Donor measurements • Meniscus • Tibial plateau Recipient measurements • True PA

PREOPERATIVE PROTOCOL Donor measurements • Meniscus • Tibial plateau Recipient measurements • True PA and lateral xray • CT: tibial plateau

INDICATIONS 1. Total meniscectomy , body and posterior horn 2. Age: < 55 y-o.

INDICATIONS 1. Total meniscectomy , body and posterior horn 2. Age: < 55 y-o. 3. Sports and physical activities 4. Local untractable pain 5. No instability (? ) 6. Normal axial limb aligment (? ) 7. Outerbridge I and II grade (III, IV? )

Material and method 11 cases (4 rejected < 12 m f/u) OR Nov. 2001

Material and method 11 cases (4 rejected < 12 m f/u) OR Nov. 2001 – Jul 2003 Mean F/U (months) = 13. 6; r(8, 22) Labour activ.

Material and method

Material and method

Material and method Months post-meniscectomy 35 (2 – 90) Nº of previous arthroscopies 2.

Material and method Months post-meniscectomy 35 (2 – 90) Nº of previous arthroscopies 2. 3 (1 -5)

Tibial plateau measurements (mean) Donor 35 mm x 49 mm Patient 32 mm x

Tibial plateau measurements (mean) Donor 35 mm x 49 mm Patient 32 mm x 46 mm

Material and method

Material and method

Material and method Outerbridge chondral lesions

Material and method Outerbridge chondral lesions

IKDC: subjective assessment Pre-op Post-op Symptoms 23. 75 25. 33 Sport activ. 27. 75

IKDC: subjective assessment Pre-op Post-op Symptoms 23. 75 25. 33 Sport activ. 27. 75 35. 76 TOTAL 38. 27 48. 72

IKDC: objective assessment PRE-OP/ POST-OP A (Normal) B (Nearly normal) C (Abnormal) D (Severely

IKDC: objective assessment PRE-OP/ POST-OP A (Normal) B (Nearly normal) C (Abnormal) D (Severely abnormal) Compartmental findings 2/4 1/1 3/1 1/1 Range of motion 5/6 2/1 Functional test 3/4 3/2 TOTAL 3/5 4/2 1/1

IKDC: objective assessment PRE-OP/ POST-OP TOTAL Lysholm 45/65. 75 (Abnormal/Fair) Tegner WOMAC 4. 5/3.

IKDC: objective assessment PRE-OP/ POST-OP TOTAL Lysholm 45/65. 75 (Abnormal/Fair) Tegner WOMAC 4. 5/3. 5 85. 5/86. 3 (120) (Mod. heavy work/recreational sports)

Follow-up: arthroscopy 2 revision arthroscopy • arthrofibrosis (4 th month) • infection vs. inmunologic

Follow-up: arthroscopy 2 revision arthroscopy • arthrofibrosis (4 th month) • infection vs. inmunologic response (11 th month)

Follow-up: arthroscopy/MRI Revision MRI (5 cases) • 5 peripherically healed • 4 body and/or

Follow-up: arthroscopy/MRI Revision MRI (5 cases) • 5 peripherically healed • 4 body and/or anterior horn extruded • 5 intrasubstance degeneration

Follow-up: MRI 6 th month post-op

Follow-up: MRI 6 th month post-op

Follow-up: MRI 6 th month post-op

Follow-up: MRI 6 th month post-op

OUR SURGICAL TECHNIQUE • • • With or without bone plugs (? ) Peripheral

OUR SURGICAL TECHNIQUE • • • With or without bone plugs (? ) Peripheral groove for medial meniscus Contralateral tunnels Posterior horn suture (Fast Fix® MI, Sharp Shutter® ME) Meniscus body (Sharp Shutter®) Anterior horn suture (outside-in)

CONCLUSIONS • • • Promissing byological and mechanical results Good preliminary clinical results “Dissappointing”

CONCLUSIONS • • • Promissing byological and mechanical results Good preliminary clinical results “Dissappointing” mid-term results (5 -10 years)

¡MUCHAS GRACIAS! THANK YOU !

¡MUCHAS GRACIAS! THANK YOU !