Memory Modal Model of the Mind l l

  • Slides: 31
Download presentation
Memory

Memory

Modal Model of the Mind l l Three memory stores Four Control Processes Maintenance

Modal Model of the Mind l l Three memory stores Four Control Processes Maintenance Rehearsal Sensory Input Sensory Memory Attention Encoding Working or Long-term Short-term memory Memory Retrieval

Sensory Memory Store l Sensory Input Sensory Memory l Divided into two subtypes: l

Sensory Memory Store l Sensory Input Sensory Memory l Divided into two subtypes: l iconic memory - visual information l echoic memory auditory information Visual or iconic memory was discovered by Sperling in 1960

Sperling’s Experiment l Presented matrix of letters for 1/20 a second l Report as

Sperling’s Experiment l Presented matrix of letters for 1/20 a second l Report as many letters as possible l Subjects recall only half of the letters l Was this because subjects didn’t have enough time to view entire matrix? No l How did Sperling know this?

Sperling’s Experiment l l Sperling showed people can see and recall ALL the letters

Sperling’s Experiment l l Sperling showed people can see and recall ALL the letters momentarily Sounded low, medium or high tone immediately after matrix disappeared l tone signaled 1 row to report l recall was almost perfect z Memory for image fades after 1/3 seconds or so, making report of entire display hard to do High Medium Low

How does Information get from Sensory to STM? Who did research in this area?

How does Information get from Sensory to STM? Who did research in this area?

Selective Attention l Also called “Preattentive Processing” Cherry 1953 Dichotic Listening

Selective Attention l Also called “Preattentive Processing” Cherry 1953 Dichotic Listening

Cocktail Party Effect l l l The ability to focus on a single speaker,

Cocktail Party Effect l l l The ability to focus on a single speaker, even if there are many speakers, is known as the “cocktail party effect” The hearing impaired have a diminished ability to focus on one speaker when there are numerous contemporaneous sounds Recent research aims to separate the audio signals so that only the speaker of interest is amplified by the hearing aid

Separation Methods l Classical methods l l Beamforming l l Assumes speech sources of

Separation Methods l Classical methods l l Beamforming l l Assumes speech sources of no interest are in far field Adaptive Noise Cancellation l l Exploit spectral diversity Assumes availability of reference signal (which must not contain speech of interest) Blind Source Separation, BSS l Exploit spatial diversity, e. g. , speech sources must be spatially distinct

Short Term Memory Store l l l Function - conscious processing of information l

Short Term Memory Store l l l Function - conscious processing of information l where information is actively worked on Capacity - limited (holds 7 +/- 2 items) Duration - brief storage (about 15 - 30 seconds) Sensory Input Sensory Memory Attention Working or Short-term Memory

Short Term Memory l Miller – The Magical Number 7, Plus or Minus Two.

Short Term Memory l Miller – The Magical Number 7, Plus or Minus Two. l Chunking l Peterson and Peterson – Short Term Retention of Individual Verbal Items.

Maintenance Rehearsal Allows information to remain in working memory longer than the usual 30

Maintenance Rehearsal Allows information to remain in working memory longer than the usual 30 seconds Maintenance rehearsal Sensory Input Sensory Memory Attention Working or Short-term Memory

Working Memory Model Baddeley (1992) l 3 interacting components l Visuospatial Sketch Pad Central

Working Memory Model Baddeley (1992) l 3 interacting components l Visuospatial Sketch Pad Central Executive Phonological Loop

Working Memory Model l Visuospatial sketch pad - holds visual and spatial info Phonological

Working Memory Model l Visuospatial sketch pad - holds visual and spatial info Phonological loop - holds verbal information Central executive - coordinates all activities of working memory; brings new information into working memory from sensory and long-term memory Visuospatial Sketch pad Central Executive Phonological Loop

How does Information get from STM to LTM? Who did research in this area?

How does Information get from STM to LTM? Who did research in this area?

Encoding and Levels of Processing Craik and Tulving 1975 Type of Processing Deep 0

Encoding and Levels of Processing Craik and Tulving 1975 Type of Processing Deep 0 Shallow -Acoustic Shallow - Visual 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Percent of words recalled 90 100

More Evidence for Elaboration Positive correlation between grades and use of elaboration in 5

More Evidence for Elaboration Positive correlation between grades and use of elaboration in 5 th grade students l In an experiment, college students assigned to use elaboration received higher grades than students not taught elaboration l

Ways to Use Elaboration Actively question new information l Think about its implications l

Ways to Use Elaboration Actively question new information l Think about its implications l Relate information to things you already know l Generate own examples of concepts l Don’t highlight passage as you read l Focus on the ideas in the text l

Long-term Memory Systems Squire 1993

Long-term Memory Systems Squire 1993

Explicit Memory l Also known as declarative or conscious memory

Explicit Memory l Also known as declarative or conscious memory

Implicit Memory Also known as nondeclarative memory Influences your thoughts or behavior, but does

Implicit Memory Also known as nondeclarative memory Influences your thoughts or behavior, but does not enter consciousness

There is biological evidence for these theories as shown in Pet Scans.

There is biological evidence for these theories as shown in Pet Scans.

Modal Model of the Mind l l Three memory stores Four Control Processes Maintenance

Modal Model of the Mind l l Three memory stores Four Control Processes Maintenance Rehearsal Sensory Input Sensory Memory Attention Encoding Working or Long-term Short-term memory Memory Retrieval

Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer: Memory Experiment and Hypothesis l Hypothesis: People will remember

Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer: Memory Experiment and Hypothesis l Hypothesis: People will remember a car accident differently if given different language cues (words) about the accident

Loftus and Palmer: Methodology l l l Students watched a film of two cars

Loftus and Palmer: Methodology l l l Students watched a film of two cars colliding Collision was moderate with no broken glass Different students asked different questions: hit, smashed, collided, bumped, contacted

Loftus and Palmer: Results l l VERB MEAN ESTIMATE OF SPEED (MPH) Smashed 40.

Loftus and Palmer: Results l l VERB MEAN ESTIMATE OF SPEED (MPH) Smashed 40. 8 Collided 39. 3 Bumped 38. 1 Hit 34. 0 Contacted 31. 8 People reported the fastest speeds if the researchers had used the word “smashed” in the question From fastest to slowest reported speeds: smashed, collided, bumped, hit, and contacted groups

Loftus and Palmer: Results l l One week later, subjects were asked if they

Loftus and Palmer: Results l l One week later, subjects were asked if they had seen broken glass 32% of subjects asked the “smashed” question said yes; 14% of subjects asked the “hit” question said yes

Loftus and Palmer: Results and Implications l l People remember things differently depending on

Loftus and Palmer: Results and Implications l l People remember things differently depending on the language used to describe an event (e. g. , “smashed” versus “hit”) Misinformation effect

Role of Time : Decay Theory l l Memories fade away or decay gradually

Role of Time : Decay Theory l l Memories fade away or decay gradually if unused Time plays critical role Ability to retrieve info declines with time after original encoding Problem: Many things change with time. Something else may change and actually cause forgetting: Interference