Medical Ethics Medical Ethics vs Professional ethics w

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Medical Ethics

Medical Ethics

Medical Ethics [vs. Professional ethics] w Ethical dilemma is a predicament in which there

Medical Ethics [vs. Professional ethics] w Ethical dilemma is a predicament in which there is no clear course to resolve the problem of conflicting moral principles

Principles w Autonomy w Beneficience w Nonmaleficence w Justice

Principles w Autonomy w Beneficience w Nonmaleficence w Justice

Autonomy w Freedom to influence course of life/treatment – Requires the person to be

Autonomy w Freedom to influence course of life/treatment – Requires the person to be competent in decision making capacity

Preservation of Autonomy w Living Will • Takes effect when terminally ill and lacking

Preservation of Autonomy w Living Will • Takes effect when terminally ill and lacking decision making capacity w Surrogate Decision Makers – Represents patients interest

Preservation of Autonomy w The primary responsibility of the physician is to serve the

Preservation of Autonomy w The primary responsibility of the physician is to serve the patients interest

The patient self determination act of 1990 w At the time of admission information

The patient self determination act of 1990 w At the time of admission information re: the patients’ right to refuse care or create an advance directive must be dispensed

Informed Consent w Patient is presented all alternatives so they can make a decision.

Informed Consent w Patient is presented all alternatives so they can make a decision. Must be competent w Requirements – Decision making capacity – Volutariness – Reasonable person standard w Present all alternatives f/b recommendation w Respect refusal w All surgical and experimental procedures

Implied Consent w Invoked when in emergency situations when harm would result without urgently

Implied Consent w Invoked when in emergency situations when harm would result without urgently needed intervention

Disclosure w Truth telling on part of physician is an integral part of patient

Disclosure w Truth telling on part of physician is an integral part of patient autonomy

Paternalism w Justifiable if patient at risk of significant preventable harm, paternalistic action will

Paternalism w Justifiable if patient at risk of significant preventable harm, paternalistic action will prevent harm, benefits outweigh risks and the least autonomy-restrictive course of action is used

Confidentiality w Obligation of physician to maintain information in strict confidence w Breaching patient

Confidentiality w Obligation of physician to maintain information in strict confidence w Breaching patient confidentiality may be merited only: – When ordered by court of law – a court case – Where statutory requirement – public health laws – Where required in health professional’s defense – malpractice suit – Where necessary for appropriate patient carespeaking to another provider in the medical care system

w The percentage of patients who would like to be told their diagnosis if

w The percentage of patients who would like to be told their diagnosis if it is a: Metastatic cancer Prognosis European Americans 87% African Americans 88% Mexican Americans 65% Korean Americans 47% Ethiopians (can you guess? )? ? % Terminal 69% 63% 48% 35% ? ? % Source: Blackhall LJ, et al. (1995) JAMA 274: 820 -5. w The more traditional the culture … the less truth telling regarding patient condition

Beneficience w Obligation to preserve life, restore health, relieve suffering and maintain function w

Beneficience w Obligation to preserve life, restore health, relieve suffering and maintain function w To do “good” w Nonabandonment – obligation to provide ongoing care w Conflict of interest – must not engage in activities that are not in patients best interest

Nonmaleficence w “Do no harm”

Nonmaleficence w “Do no harm”

Justice w Allocation of medical resources must be fair and according to need w

Justice w Allocation of medical resources must be fair and according to need w Physicians should not make decisions regarding individuals based upon societal needs

DNR w DNR orders affect CPR only w Otherapies should not be influenced by

DNR w DNR orders affect CPR only w Otherapies should not be influenced by DNR order w Should be reviewed frequently w Rationale should be in medical record

Persistent Vegetative State w Uncnsciousness/ loss of self awareness lasting more than weeks w

Persistent Vegetative State w Uncnsciousness/ loss of self awareness lasting more than weeks w Supreme court draws no distinction between artificial feeding, hydration vs. mechanical ventilation

Death w Irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory function w Irreversible cessation of all

Death w Irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory function w Irreversible cessation of all brain function (including brainstem)

Ethical Dilemas w Euthanasia – Legally prohibited in the US except in Oregon which

Ethical Dilemas w Euthanasia – Legally prohibited in the US except in Oregon which permits MD assisted suicide w Destroying Frozen Embryos

Case Studies w Lake, your 36 -year-old patient, has just tested positive for HIV.

Case Studies w Lake, your 36 -year-old patient, has just tested positive for HIV. He asks that you not inform his wife of the results and claims he is not ready to tell her yet.

Case Studies w 22 year-old woman, is admitted to the hospital with a headache,

Case Studies w 22 year-old woman, is admitted to the hospital with a headache, stiff neck and photophobia but an intact mental status. Lab tests reveal contagious meningitis. She refuses treatment for it.

w A 25 year old woman victim of a single car MVA enters a

w A 25 year old woman victim of a single car MVA enters a persistent vegetative state. After four years, her parents petition to have her feeding tube removed. The hospital insists on a court order, and the victim’s closest friend and parents testify that she would not have wanted to have a feeding tube.