ME Capacity Development in the Af Co PMf

M&E Capacity Development in the Af. Co. P-Mf. DR and the Case in Ethiopia Tamirat Yacob (tamiratyc@gmail. com) Af. Co. P M&E CMT and Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Ethiopia

Outline • • • Mf. DR and Co. Ps Af. Co. P Management and support of the Af. Co. P How the Co. P functions Achievements as an Af. Co. P (results/impacts in the Af. Co. P) M&E and Capacity Development in the Af. Co. P and CAP Scan “lessons” on evaluation capacity development in Ethiopia Conclusion

Managing for Development Results • Managing for Development Results (Mf. DR) means focusing on development performance and on sustainable improvements in country outcomes • Mf. DR principles: focus the dialogue on results; align programming, M&E with results; keep measurement and reporting simple; Manage for , not by, results; Use results information for learning and decision making

Community of Practice • Community of Practice (Co. P) is defined as an informal network group of people who share common sense of purpose and desire to exchange knowledge and experiences in an area of shared interest

African Community of Practice on Mf. DR • Two regional workshops organized by OECD/DAC and the Governments of Uganda and Burkina Faso in June 2006 gave a call for the creation of mutual learning opportunities. • The African Community of Practice on Managing for Development Results (Af. Co. P-Mf. DR) launched in Feb. 2007 at the third International Round Table in Hanoi, Vietnam. • Vision of the Af. Co. P: to facilitate good Mf. DR practices through information exchange and to provide capacity development opportunities for results management among countries on the African continent • Mission of the Af. Co. P: provide a platform for the exchange of experience and knowledge among

Af. Co. P Members • Member: 500+(580, June 2009) • African Countries: 35 • Other countries: 29 • Agencies/Donors: 14 • Women: 146 • Men: 429

Monitoring and Evaluation in the Af. Co. P • Capacity Building and Knowledge Management Team - Develop Mf. DR capacity of Co. P members with the goal of enhancing country institutional capacities • Monitoring and Evaluation Team - Monitor and Evaluate policies and activities of the Af. Co. P based on the annual work plan

M&E Capacity Development in the Af. Co. P • M&E related discussions in the Af. Co. P (English/French) • Integrated M&E and MIS under the IRBM in 2008 • In 2009 discussion topics would include: - Evaluation of the impact of development policies/strategies; - Results-based evaluation; - New implications for monitoring and evaluation of programs and development projects under an Mf. DR approach; - Monitoring & Evaluation using KPIs – what are the pitfalls?

Gaps in M&E Capacity Development • The Af. Co. P is not providing M&E capacity building trainings as much as needed as resources are not abundant (hands on M&E tools and methodologies trainings/workshops/forums are highly needed) • M&E knowledge and experience is so diverse among us • We are more focused on discussions and less hands on experience in M&E system designs to our members, etc • Joint evaluation works experience shortage • Available M&E experts who can moderate and train people are not many • Resources are not abundant in the Af. Co. P

We seek for new partnership for M&E CD in the Af. Co. P • M&E, Statistics, Planning and budgeting, implementation capacities are “weak” in Africa • Af. Co. P’s Capacity is the “mirror image” of capacity in the continent • How and What type of working partnerships? - Increase the partnership of Co. Ps and related Networks (South and North-south) - Learning by doing (participate in different assessment exercises and future works: e. g. joint evaluation exercises) - Trainings, workshops and forums to share experiences using existing platforms - Experts in networks like this one and donor evaluation managers are welcomed to join and can train members, share their experience,

M&E Capacity Development in Ethiopia In Ethiopia development partners act like as a consortium called Development Assistance Group(DAG) 8 million USD has been put in place from the DAG for M&E capacity development in the country for the PASDEP period (2005/06 – 2009/10) Welfare Monitoring System Program (M&E system) since 1996 Three main actors in the M&E system: Ministry of Finance and Economic Development Federal Executive bodies (line ministries); and, Central Statistical Agency (CSA)

M&E Capacity Dev’t in Ethiopia Sectoral M&E systems: education, road, health, water and sanitation in that order are relatively more systematized and well linked to the grass root level than the monitoring system for other sectors. Agriculture’s is weak and a lot is undergoing to improve it Agriculture Statistics working team Water and Sanitation M&E system building The National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) is to push the statistical capacity development agenda forward in Ethiopia

M&E Capacity Development in Ethiopia (continued) Capacity Development in the CSA Branch Networking for data collection and transfer to HQ Satellite mapping for agricultural surveys Data scanning mechanism/e. g. The 2007 National Population and Housing Census/ National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) - Quality assurance, the speed of analysis, along with the speed and network of dissemination

Lessons learned in the M&E systems of Ethiopia More emphasis to build the capacity of the sectoral M&E systems of Agriculture and Water and Sanitation in Ethiopia Use of country systems by bilateral and multilateral donors is now increasing Emerging good practice: The Aid Management Platform(AMP) system for better Aid management (The 2008 Third Source Book on good practice on Mf. DR, OECD and the WB) Existing Data source use has increased in preparation of Country Assistance Frameworks and country missions Country systems are now becoming strong and strong as lot of initiatives and capacity development has been going in the area in collaboration with development partners

Conclusions • The Af. Co. P plays a role in facilitating and exchanging M&E CD initiatives for its member countries so it is advantages to make partnership and work together • Financial, in kind and expert assistance are needed • Countries should emphasise capacity develop of their “weak” M&E systems in collaboration/jointly with donors • Enhanced and coordinated effort is needed, (e. g. for better aid management) using country systems and manage for development results

Thank you! Please visit the Af. Co. P site and be a member, contribute and share your stories www. cop-mfdr-africa. org