May 2011 doc IEEE 802 11 110732 r

  • Slides: 36
Download presentation
May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 JTC 1 Ad Hoc

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 JTC 1 Ad Hoc May 2011 agenda 10 May 2011 Authors: Submission Slide 1 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 This presentation will be

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 This presentation will be used to run the JTC 1 Ad Hoc meetings in Palm Springs in May 2011 • This presentation contains a proposed running order for the IEEE 802. 11 JTC 1 Ad Hoc committee meeting in May 2011, including – Proposed agenda – Other supporting material • It will be modified during the meeting to include motions, straw polls and other material referred to during the meeting Submission Slide 2 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 Participants have a duty

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 Participants have a duty to inform in relation to patents • All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEESA Patent Policy (IEEE-SA SB Bylaws subclause 6. 2). Participants: – “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents — “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim, ” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims – “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) – The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged; there is no duty to perform a patent search Submission Slide 3 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There a variety of

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There a variety of patent related links • All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEESA Policies & Procedures for standards development. • Patent Policy is stated in these sources: – IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws — http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/bylaws/sect 6 -7. html#6 – IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual — http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3 • Material about the patent policy is available at – http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-material. html • If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat/index. html • This slide set is available at http: //standards. ieee. org/board/patslideset. ppt Submission Slide 4 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 A call for potentially

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 A call for potentially essential patents is not required in the JTC 1 Ad Hoc • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: – Either speak up now or – Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or – Cause an LOA to be submitted Submission Slide 5 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc will operate using general guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. – Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. – Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. — Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. — Technical considerations remain primary focus – Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. – Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. – Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Submission Slide 6 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 Links are available to

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 Links are available to a variety of other useful resources • Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation – http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html • Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines – http: //standards. ieee. org/resources/antitrust-guidelines. pdf • Link to IEEE Code of Ethics – http: //www. ieee. org/web/membership/ethics/code_ethics. html • Link to IEEE Patent Policy – http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt Submission Slide 7 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc will operate using accepted principles of meeting etiquette • IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization • Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professional manner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization. • Individuals are to address the “technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter. Submission Slide 8 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc has a very general proposed agenda for the Palm Springs meeting Tuesday PM 1 Wednesday AM 1 Thursday AM 1 • Call to Order • Select recording secretary • Approve agenda • Conduct meeting according to agenda • Recess • Conduct meeting according to agenda • Recess Submission Slide 9 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc has a detailed list of agenda items to be considered • Approve agenda • Approve minutes from March in Singapore • Review extended goals • Review status of liaisons previously sent to SC 6 • Review “draft liaison” presentation for SC 6 meeting in June • Consider update on WAPI progress • Discuss “ 802. 11 is secure” presentation for SC 6 meeting in June • Review “identifier conflict” presentation for SC 6 meeting in June Submission Slide 10 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc has a detailed list of agenda items to be considered • Review possible NPs to be discussed at SC 6 meeting in June – Review “ 802. 1 replacement” presentation for SC 6 meeting in June – Discuss “ 802. 11 replacement” presentation for SC 6 meeting in June • Discuss new PSDO agreement • Discus NB submissions to SC 6 • Review and approve any liaisons and presentations to SC 6 • Discuss delegation for SC 6 meeting • Discuss SC 6 processes • Discuss planning teleconferences for SC 6 meeting • Discuss Class A liaison to SC 6 Submission Slide 11 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc will consider approving its agenda Motion to approve agenda • The JTC 1 Ad Hoc approves the agenda for its meeting in Palm Springs in May 2011, as documented on pages 9 -11 of <this slide deck> • Moved: • Seconded • Result Submission Slide 12 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc will consider approval of previous minutes Motion to approve minutes • The JTC 1 Ad Hoc approves the minutes for its meeting in Singapore in March 2011, as documented in 11 -11 -548 • Moved: • Seconded • Result Submission Slide 13 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 Ad Hoc reaffirmed its general goals in Sept 09, but they were extended in Nov 2010 Agreed (with changes from Nov 2010) goals • Provides a forum for 802 members to discuss issues relevant to both: – IEEE 802 – ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 • Recommends positions to Ex. Com on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 actions affecting IEEE 802 – Note that 802 LMSC holds the liaison to SC 6, not 802. 11 WG • Participates in dialog with IEEE staff and 802 Ex. Com on issues concerning IEEE ’s relationship with ISO/IEC • Organises IEEE 802 members to contribute to liaisons and other documents relevant to the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 members Extensions • The extensions to our goals came out of the 802 Ex. Com ad hoc held in November 2010 on the Friday evening Submission Slide 14 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The 802. 11 WG

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The 802. 11 WG has liaised various Sponsor Ballot drafts to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 Task Group Liaised after LA Liaised after Orlando Liaised after Beijing Liaised after SD Liaised after Hawaii Liaised after Dallas Liaised after LA Liaised after Sing. Status Jan 10 Mar 10 May 10 July 10 Sept 10 Nov 10 Jan 11 Mar 11 May 11 TGmb - - - D 6. 0 - D 8. 0 TGs - - - D 8. 0 - D 10. 0 TGu D 8. 0 - - D 11. 0 - D 13. 0 - - Ratified TGv D 9. 0 - D 11. 0 D 13. 0 D 15. 0 - - - Ratified TGz D 7. 0 - D 9. 0 D 12. 0 D 13. 0 - - - Ratifed Submission Slide 15 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 No technical comments have

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 No technical comments have been received on any of the drafts liaised to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 • No formal technical comments have been received • A Swiss NB representation has noted a possible input informally – I have discovered three years ago some flaws in 8802 -11: 2005, in the basic MAC protocol specs (the sequence number handling) which I would like to verify in the actual draft version, and report to you if it is still there – Note: it has since been reported that the alleged problem has already been fixed in IEEE 802. 11 -207 Submission Slide 16 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will review possible presentation to SC 6 related to the liaison relationship • A presentation has been drafted that summarises various elements of the liaison relationship between SC 6 and IEEE 802 – See 11 -11 -735 r 0 • The presentation concludes – How can the formal liaison process between the 802. 11 WG and SC 6 be improved? – Do SC 6 NBs want to continue receiving Sponsor Ballot drafts from 802. 11 WG? – Does SC 6 believe it needs to ratify IEEE 802. 11 standards? • The JTC 1 ad hoc will review the presentation Submission Slide 17 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 It was recognised by

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 It was recognised by the ad hoc in September 2009 that WAPI is of vital interest to the JTC 1 Ad Hoc • It was agreed by the JTC 1 ad hoc in Hawaii in Sept 09 that WAPI remains an important and constant issue for consideration • This is the case for a variety of reasons, possibly including: – – WAPI appears to duplicate functionality of 802. 11 i The promoters of WAPI assert that 802. 11 i is insecure It is unclear how or whether 802. 11 i and WAPI can coexist … Submission Slide 18 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The new project proposal

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The new project proposal for WAPI in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 was approved in early 2010 • WAPI was submitted by the China to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 as a New Project proposal for a stand alone standard • No response was received to the IEEE 802 liaison to SC 6 in Nov 2009 (see N 14142) – This liaison noted that the claims that IEEE 802. 11 is not secure are unfounded – The liaison also suggests that WAPI should be submitted to IEEE 802. 11 for consideration – This liaison was discussed at the SC 6 meeting in Jan 10 but no reply was received • The SC 6 National Bodies subsequently approved the New Project – 10 out of 18 NB’s voted “yes” (10 required) – 5 NB’s stated they would participate in the project (5 required) Submission Slide 19 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There was some discussion

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There was some discussion of WAPI at the SC 6 meeting in London, and a comment ballot started • A new version of WAPI was proposed – The previous version was written as an amendment – The new version is written as a standalone standard — It references 8802 -11: 2005, which is actually IEEE 802. 11 -2003 – The new version is called 20011 instead of as 8802 -11 amendment • Draft dispositions were also provided to comments by NB’s related to the WAPI NP proposal – Only comments were from US and UK – The proposed responses to the comments were subject to a ballot closing on 6 Jan 11 Submission Slide 20 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 An unofficial response has

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 An unofficial response has been received to IEEE 802 rebuttal of false assertions about 802. 11 security • IEEE 802 liaised a document to SC 6 in early January 2011 – It noted various erroneous claims about 802. 11 in the WAPI NP proposal comment resolution document; see N 14551 – The US NB made similar comments in N 14549 • No official response has been received as of May 2011 but responses are included in a revised draft disposition of comments – See N 14620 for revised draft disposition of comment – Most concerns were dismissed on basis they were not appropriate during WD stage; similar comments by the US NB were also dismissed • It is planned that the IEEE 802 representatives at the SC 6 meeting in June will: – Represent the views in N 14551 – Object to the concerns being dismissed Submission Slide 21 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will review a presentation for SC 6 called “ 802. 11 is secure” • The fundamental issue in the WAPI NP justification is the claim that 802. 11 i is insecure; this claim is false • A presentation has been drafted based on two related IEEE 802 liaisons to SC 6 (N 14142 in Dec 2009 and N 14551 in Jan 2011) – See 11 -11 -734 r 0 for draft • The requests in the presentation are – Remove all existing allegations of insecurity of 802. 11 i from official SC 6 output documents – Alternatively, provide credible evidence of any insecurity in 802. 11 i – Halt any new project activity that relies on the invalid assertion that 802. 11 i is insecure as part of its justification • The JTC 1 ad hoc will review the presentation Submission Slide 22 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will review a presentation for SC 6 related to the identifier conflict issue • A presentation has been drafted that summarises the identifier conflict issue based on N 14643 – See 11 -11 -736 r 0 for draft • It concludes by asking: – Please confirm whether or not SC 6 requires the IE and the status codes to remain reserved? • The JTC 1 ad hoc will review the presentation Submission Slide 23 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There were a number

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 There were a number of items of particular interest to IEEE 802 discussed at the London SC 6 meeting • The Chinese NB made proposals in London (Sept 10) for alternatives to: – – 802. 11 – new PHY and MAC (Nu. Front) 802. 1 X – proposal is based on Te. PA (IWNCOMM) 802. 1 AE – proposal is TLSec (IWNCOMM) 802. 16 security – proposal is TAAA (IWNCOMM) • It was proposed that SC 6 start Study Periods to examine these proposals before formal projects are started • However, the documents were submitted too late for any formal resolutions to start Study Periods 802. 11 Submission 802. 1 X 802. 1 AE 802. 16 security Slide 24 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The Chinese NB security

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The Chinese NB security related proposals were all based on Te. PA • SC 27 has approved Te. PA (Triple-Element Peer Authentication ) • Te. PA is essentially the authentication part of WAPI • Te. PA is defined as an amendment to 9798 -3 (Information technology -Security techniques -- Entity authentication -- Part 3: Mechanisms using digital signature techniques) • The security proposals (replacements of 802. 1 X, 802. 1 AE and 802. 16 security) are all directly or indirectly based on Te. PA Submission Slide 25 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The China NB has

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The China NB has confirmed that they will be making multiple NP proposals • The actual NP proposals or motions are not yet available but the NP topics are on the agenda for the San Diego meeting in June 2011 – See SC 6/WG 1 agenda embedded • The SC 6/WG 1 agenda includes – 5. 4. Other proposals related with LAN — — 5. 4. 1 Access control ← 802. 1 X security replacement 5. 4. 2 PHY MAC Spec ← 802. 11 replacement 5. 4. 3 Further enhancement on LAN Security ← 802. 1 AE replacement 5. 4. 4 MAC Security Specifications ← 802. 16 security replacement • It is not clear if there associated motions • Any motions will considered by SC 6 – The proposed SC 6 agenda is currently very generic Submission Slide 26 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will discuss a possible “ 802. 1 replacement” presentation to SC 6 • IEEE 802. 1 sent a liaison in March 2011 commenting on the proposals to standardise replacements of 802. 1 X/AE – See N 14648 • The tiger team of the 802. 1 WG has been working on a document based on the liaison for presentation to SC 6 in San Diego in June – See <tbd> for draft • The JTC 1 ad will review and discuss the presentation Submission Slide 27 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc may discuss a possible “ 802. 11 replacement” presentation to SC 6 • It is likely that a proposal will be made in SC 6 by the China NB on behalf of Nufront Software to define a new MAC and PHY • The NP has been justified on 802. 11 alleged deficiencies – – Low efficiency MAC High complexity High power consumption Complex networking – difficult to support large number of users • No one has volunteered to develop a liaison or presentation yet • The JTC 1 ad will discuss the need for a liaison Submission Slide 28 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc may discuss the new PSDO agreement • A new PSDO agreement has been signed between IEEE and ISO – See <tbd> • The JTC 1 ad hoc will briefly review the document and any changes Submission Slide 29 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc may review NB submissions to SC 6 • It is believed that submissions will be sent by – US NB – UK NB –. . . • The submissions may be reviewed if they are available Submission Slide 30 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 All decision and positions

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 All decision and positions related to China will be reviewed by the IEEE International Ad-hoc • The IEEE SA Bo. G has determined that the IEEE International ad hoc committee is required to review: – any documents related to China that will be represented as an IEEE position – any decisions related to China Submission Slide 31 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will approve any necessary motions • <tbd> Submission Slide 32 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The next ISO/IEC JTC

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The next ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 meeting is being held in June 11 in San Diego • SC 6 has a meeting every 9 months or so – The last meeting was held in Sept 10 in London – The next meeting is scheduled for 20 -24 June 11 in San Diego – The following meeting is in China in March 2012 • Attendees will be appointed during the May 2011 interim meeting – – – Bruce Kraemer (Ho. D) Attendee 1 Attendee 2 Attendee 3 Attendee 4 Attendee 5 Submission Slide 33 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will discuss SC 6 processes • Bruce Kramer will lead a discussion of SC 6 processes – See <tbd> Submission Slide 34 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc will conduct at least one teleconference in preparation for SC 6 in June • The date and time of the teleconference is <tbd> Submission Slide 35 Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/0732 r 1 The JTC 1 ad hoc may discuss a Class A liaison with SC 6 • Bruce Kraemer may lead a discussion of IEEE 802 becoming a Class A liaison to SC 6 Submission Slide 36 Andrew Myles, Cisco