May 2007 doc IEEE 802 11 070679 r

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy May Opening Report Date: 2007 -05 -13 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802. 11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802. 11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt >, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. " Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart@ok-brit. com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802. 11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee. org>. Submission 1 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Abstract This submission summarizes the TGy agenda for IEEE 802. 11 Montreal (May 2007) meeting Submission 2 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Opening Report Submission 3 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Attendance Recording -802. 11 • Sign-in at http: //newton. events. ieee. org – “newton” is a local server, not reachable via a VPN – “newton” is active only during 802. 11 sessions – 172. 16. 0. 10 ? • First “sign in” to provide contact information – Only name and affiliation may be posted publicly, as per IEEE rules – No other personal information will not be publicly available • Second, log attendance Submission 4 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy – May 2007 • Call Meeting to Order • Policies and Procedures, Attendance reminder: http: //newton/ • **IEEE Patent Policy http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt • Are there any patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard? Minute any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. • ***Affiliation FAQ - http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html • Anti-Trust FAQ - http: //standards. ieee. org/resources/antitrust-guidelines. pdf • Ethics - http: //www. ieee. org/portal/cms_docs/about/Co. E_poster. pdf • IEEE 802. 11 Policies and Procedures http: //www. ieee 802. org/11/Doc. Files/06/11 -06 -0812 -03 -0000 -802 -11 -policiesand-proceedures. htm • IEEE 802 Policies and Procedures - http: //www. ieee 802. org/policies-andprocedures. pdf ** Read slide deck *** Note especially items #7 & #11 Submission 5 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Copyright • Under the current US copyright law — the author of information is deemed to own the copyright from the moment of creation • The IEEE Bylaws require copyright of all material to be held by the IEEE – Must consult with IEEE for re-use of copyright material • The IEEE Standards accomplishes transfer of copyright ownership through the Project Authorization Request (PAR) process Submission 6 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Equipment • Well-dressed criminals often enter meetings and steal laptops, PDAs, and similar devices • Do not leave your devices unattended!! • Make sure you log your attendance – http: //newton. events. ieee. org Submission 7 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Goals for Montreal • Resolve LB 104 Ballot comments • Planning through July 2007 Submission 8 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Agenda Tuesday 08: 00 * CBP TG Meeting Call To Order - Chair 1 08: 00 * Review IEEE/802 & 802. 11 Policies and Rules - Chair/All 8 08: 01 * Approve or Modify Agenda - Chair 5 08: 09 II Review and Approve All Minutes - Chair/All 10 08: 14 DT Set, Review Objectives - All 5 08: 24 DT Review of situation - All 10 08: 29 DT Overview presentation, PHY, MAC topics - All 30 08: 39 DT LB 104 comment review - All 51 09: 09 * Recess until 19: 30 Tuesday - Chair Submission 9 0 10: 00 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Agenda Tuesday 19: 30 * CBP TG Meeting Call To Order - Chair * Situation, ballot comments, draft topics - * What is left? ECSA discussion * Recess until 8: 00 Thursday Submission 10 1 19: 30 Chair/All 59 19: 31 - Chair 60 20: 30 - Chair 0 21: 30 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Agenda Thursday 08: 00 * CBP TG Meeting Call To Order - Chair * Situation, ballot comments, draft topics - Chair/All * Recess until 16: 00 Thursday - Chair Submission 11 1 08: 00 119 08: 01 0 10: 00 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Agenda Thursday 16: 00 * CBP TG Meeting Call To Order - Chair * Draft D 2. xx and 3. 0 y topics - * Planning through Jul 07 and Motions for WG * Adjourn Submission 12 1 16: 00 All 90 16: 01 - All 29 17: 31 - Chair 0 18: 00 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Minutes review • Any Modifications of the Minutes from CBP-TG • Orlando 07/0395 r 2 • Any Modifications of the Minutes from teleconferences – May 1 st, May 8 th • 07/0641 r 0, 07/0642 r 0 Submission 13 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motions (1) Motion: Move to approve TGy agenda in 11 -07 -0679 r 1 as the agenda for the Montreal meeting. Moved: Second: Vote: Motion: Submission 14 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motions (2) Motion: Move to approve TGy minutes of meetings and teleconferences from Orlando plenary to today: • Orland 0 07/0395 r 2; • teleconferences – May 1 st, May 8 th, • 07/0641 r 0, 07/0642 r 0 Moved: Second: Vote: Motion: Submission 15 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 PAR Scope, Purpose • Scope of Proposed Project: • The scope of the proposed project is the application of 802. 11 based systems to the 3650 -3700 MHz band in the USA. • Purpose of Proposed Project: • The purpose of this project is to standardize the mechanisms required to allow shared 802. 11 operation with other users in the 3650 -3700 MHz band in the USA. Likely required mechanisms include: – – Submission Specification of new regulatory classes (extending 802. 11 j) Sensing of other transmitters (extending 802. 11 a) Transmit Power Control (extending 802. 11 h) Dynamic Frequency Selection (extending 802. 11 h) 16 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Purpose, Principles • Purpose : the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in solutions is likely to receive FCC approval for operation in 3650 -3700 MHz under the 47 CFR 90 subpart z rules. • Principles : – If the FCC changes the rules, the Task Group should change the amendment accordingly. – The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other Task Groups that are likely to complete before 802. 11 y. (Examples include parts of 802. 11 k and 801. 11 w) – There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2. 45 GHz ISM operation. The amendment should exclude some optional MAC and PHY behaviour, e. g. Point Coordination Function, FH, DSSS, and ERP. Submission 17 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Vision/Outcome • Use the OFDM PHY with 5 -, 10 - and 20 -MHz channel widths, and extend DFS to operate with other primary band users, to specify the basis for a system that the FCC can approve for operation in the US 3650 -3700 MHz band. Submission 18 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Proposal of 06/1023 r 0 • The way forward for TGy • Clause 17 OFDM PHY, TPC and DFS procedures, use a non-overlapping channel plan, improve CCA for coexistence, use 5 -, 10 -, 20 -MHz channel widths, and Regulatory Class/Coverage Class for outdoor operation Submission 19 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Four Themes of TGy Interference Identification and Resolution, Enablement, Energy Detect operation with the clause 17 PHY, and Mechanisms for use by licensees to control dependent stations. Submission 20 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 TGy Work completed to 13 May, 2007 • WG Letter Ballot was conducted on P 802. 11 y D 2. 0, 264 comments are recorded in 07/0602 r 1 • LB 104 results (as announced 10 May by WG chair) – Voter pool 347, 324 ballots received – Approved 221, Do not approve 41, Abstain 62 – (approval rate 84. 35%, passes) • 8 May Teleconference discussed all (except Comment 1107) technical comments, and one submission (07/0603), which has been on the server since May 7 th. Submission 21 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Recirculation ballot Negative vote comments • • IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 5. html#5. 3 Do Not Approve (Negative with comment). This vote must be accompanied by one or more specific objections with proposed resolution in sufficient detail in a legible form so that the specific wording of the changes that will cause the negative voter to change his or her vote to "approve" can readily be determined. The Sponsor shall encourage the submission of comments with all negative ballots. If a negative vote unaccompanied by comments, or a negative vote accompanied by comments not related to the proposal under consideration, is received despite these instructions, the vote shall be counted in the total tally of votes as a "negative without comment. " Any comments that are explicitly identified not to be part of the negative vote shall be treated as Approve (Affirmative) comments, and action on such comments is left to the discretion of the Sponsor. Submission 22 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Recirculation Comment classifications • • Accept in Principle (Accepted but revised) Reject Out of Scope – “[Negative comments] shall be based only on the changed portions of the balloted document, clauses affected by the changes, or portions of the balloted document that are the subject of the unresolved negative votes. ” • Reporting catagories – Technical, Editorial, General • Changes in the document – “Changes may be made in the document to resolve negative votes that are accompanied by comments or for other reasons. ” Submission 23 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Review LB 104 comments and Submissions • 11 -07/0602 r 1 has all comments – Review ‘Master LB 104 Original Comments’ and ‘Master LB 940194’ sheets • 11 -07 -0401 -01 -long-slottime-rtscts-procedure. ppt • 11 -07 -0603 -00 -000 y-LB 104 -DSE reporting CID 1093. doc • 11 -07 -0 yyy-00 -000 y-LB 104 -3 -5 -11. 14 -Submission. doc • 11 -07 -0673 -01 -000 y-LB 104 -Non-Editorial-commentssubmission-doc. doc • 11 -07 -0674 -01 -000 y-LB 104 -Editorial-commentssubmission. doc Submission 24 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motions (3) Motion: Move to accept draft normative text changes in submissions 07 -0 yyyr 0, 07 -0 yyyr 0, and merge their comment resolutions into 07 -0602 r 1, and instruct the editor to prepare P 802. 11 y D 2. 1 Moved: Second: Vote: Motion: Submission 25 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Next step is to review modified draft • P 802. 11 y/D 2. 1 Submission 26 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motions (4) Motion: Moved: Second: Vote: Motion: Submission 27 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Process of Getting to Letter Ballot and Beyond Completed Steps | Future Submission • Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria • Technical Presentations and Discussions • Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents • Call For Proposals • Presentation of Proposals • Select from Submitted Complete Proposals to Produce a Draft • Refine Draft • • • Letter Ballot – November 2006 Recirculation – March 2007 Sponsor Ballot – July 2007(? ) Recirculation Final WG/EC Approval IEEE SB REVCOM Approval 28 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 3 Cycles of Comments and Resolution Call for Informal Comments Comment Resolution WG Letter Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Submission 29 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Schedule Projected at Montreal (May) • May 2007 (Montreal, Quebec) – Second Letter Ballot Re-circulation • July 2007 (San Francisco, California) – Comment Resolution, First Sponsor Ballot authorized • September 2007 (Waikoloa, Hawaii) – Comment Resolution, 1 st SB Re-circ • November 2007 (Atlanta, Georgia) – Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution, 2 nd SB Re-circ • January 2008 – Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution • March 2008 – WG, Ex. Com Approval, Rev. Com Approval Submission 30 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Attendance Tuesday AM 1: Tuesday Evening: Thursday AM 1: Thursday PM 2: Submission 31 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motion Move to authorize a 15 -day Recirculation Letter Ballot of 802. 11 TGy, draft x. x to conclude no later than 00/00/0000. Moved by XXX on behalf of the Task Group Vote: Moved XXX Second XXX Result: 0 -0 -0 Submission 32 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motion Move to approve the comment response in document xx/xxxrx, believing that comment responses in the documentioned above and the draft 802. 11 x draft 0. 0 demonstrate that the WG 802. 11 LB rules have reached an orderly endpoint. Moved by XXX on behalf of the Task Group Vote: Moved XXX Second XXX Result: 0 -0 -0 Submission 33 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motion Move to authorize TGx to hold an Ad-Hoc meeting the (Month Day Year) to (Month Day Year) for the purpose of (description). Moved by XXX on behalf of the Task Group Vote: Moved XXX Second XXX Result: 0 -0 -0 Submission 34 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motion Move to authorize 802. 11 x Draft x. x to be forwarded to Ex. Com for Sponsor Ballot using LMSC Procedure 20, assuming that the conditions required for Procedure 20 are met. Moved by XXX on behalf of the Task Group Vote: Moved XXX Second XXX Result: 0 -0 -0 Submission 35 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -07/0679 r 1 Motion Move to authorize a 15 -day Recirculation Letter Ballot of 802. 11 TGy, draft 3. 0 to conclude no later than 07/07/2007. Moved by XXX on behalf of the Task Group Vote: Moved XXX Second XXX Result: 0 -0 -0 Submission 36 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems