May 2001 doc IEEE 802 15 01462 r

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 IEEE 802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ TG 1 Opening Report November 2001 Austin, TX USA Submission 2 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Contents • Summary • Motion Planning • Overview of Session #15/Austin – Objectives – Submissions – Session Graphic • Rev. Com Submission – [01462 r 1 a. P 802 -15_WG-P 802. 15. 1 -Rev. Com-Submission. pdf] • Project Planning Status • Next Meeting – Tentative Needs for Dallas – Objectives for Dallas • Drafting History Submission 3 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Summary [1 of 3] • Task Group 1 (TG 1) is deriving a draft standard from the Bluetooth™ specification under IEEE PAR 802. 15. 1 – At Session #15, motion SEC, address WG & SEC comments, IF ANY – achieve majority approval from the WG & SEC motions and enter Rev. Com phase. Pre submitted 26 Oct 01. • During the Jul 01/Nov 01 between-session-period – SB 1 ballot & resolution – SB 2 ballot & Rev. Com Application for approval of P 802. 15. 1 – IEEE-SA, Pat. Com, Rev. Com, and BSIG Submission 4 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Summary [2 of 3] • SB 2 has 2 Disapproving Voters and 19 unresolved comments (comment #7 is resolved as the 3 rd DISAPPROVING Voter changed to a YES w/ comments. ) • The TG 1 will update 00375 r 3 P 802 -15_TG 1 Project-Planning. pdf once SEC approval is achieved. ETA 17 Nov 01. Submission 5 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Summary [3 of 3] • The 802. 15. 1 submittal will be reviewed by Rev. Com. Preliminary comments will be sent to Project 802. 15. 1 by the middle of November. • Scheduled St. B Committee Meetings 4 -6 Dec 01: – http: //standards. ieee. org/board/stdsbd/meetingnotice. html – 4 Dec 01 Pat. Com - 6. 2 Letter of Assurance from Bluetooth SIG, Inc. for P 802. 15. 1 – 5 Dec 01 Rev. Com - P 802. 15. 1/D 1. 0. 1 New: "Standard for Information Technology… Submission 6 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Planned Motions • Motions – #1 Wed, 14 Nov 01 to Full WG – #2 Fri, 16 Nov 01 to SEC Submission 7 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Session #15/Austin – Motion #1 to the Full WG • Move to submit P 802. 15. 1/D 1. 0. 12001 to 802 SEC for approval of submission to Rev. Com. Non Technical 50% (Procedural) Moved: ? Second: ? Y/N/A: // Note: TG 1 pre-submitted D 1. 0. 1 to Rev. Com on 26 Oct 01. Submission 8 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Session #15/Austin – Motion #2 to the 802 SEC • Move that the Ex. Com forward IEEE Draft 802. 15. 1/D 1. 0. 1 to Rev. Com. Non Technical 50% (Procedural) Moved: ? Second: ? Y/N/A: // Note: TG 1 pre-submitted D 1. 0. 1 to Rev. Com on 26 Oct 01. Submission 9 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Session #15/Austin – Graphic Submission 10 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 IEEE 802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ Sponsor Ballots (SBs) Summary Report Submission 11 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 SBs Summary Report • Sponsor Ballot #1, passed @89% – 30 Day Electronic Ballot • 27 Jul 01 Opened • 25 Aug 01 Closed • Sponsor Ballot #2, passed @89% – 10 Day Electronic Recirculation Ballot • 2 Oct 01 Opened • 11 Oct 01 Closed The BRC continues to communicate to the three (3) DISAPPROVING Balloters and we are happy to report that one (1) DISAPPROVING Balloter has reviewed the resolutions and changed his initial and recirculation vote from DISAPPROVING to YES WITH COMMENTS (see – 01/420 r 10 Comment #7) on 12 Oct 01. This 3 to 2 change to the sponsor ballots up the affirmation to 93%. Submission 12 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 SB 1 Summary Report • • • P 802. 15. 1/D 0. 9. 2 Closing date: 2001 -08 -25 The report is the result from the group: 0000130 • 1. This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement. – – – 33 eligible people in this ballot group. 26 affirmative votes 3 negative votes 1 abstention votes 30 votes received • 90% returned • 3% abstention • 2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. – 26 affirmative votes – 3 negative votes – 29 votes • 89% affirmative Source: -01/420 r 10 Submission 13 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Generalization of Negative Comments • Proposed standard operates in the same band as 802. 11 • Coexistence not addressed • Optional power level of 100 mw • Normative vs. Informative SDL • Technical disagreements (how it works vs. how it might work better) Submission 16 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 Tentative Needs for Jan 02 Interim • 21 -25 Jan 02 (5 Days) – ~0 People TG 1 leadership is not planning to attend the Jan 02 Interim. Submission 17 Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/462 r 2 In conclusion, the Project 802. 15. 1 would like to leave you with this slide Submission 18 Ian Gifford, Consultant