MATA KULIAH FARMAKOTERAPI I PHARMACEUTICAL CARE DOCUMENTATION COMMUNICATION

  • Slides: 54
Download presentation
MATA KULIAH FARMAKOTERAPI I PHARMACEUTICAL CARE DOCUMENTATION & COMMUNICATION Dhanang Prawira Nugraha Departemen Farmasi

MATA KULIAH FARMAKOTERAPI I PHARMACEUTICAL CARE DOCUMENTATION & COMMUNICATION Dhanang Prawira Nugraha Departemen Farmasi Klinis STIKes Karya Putra Bangsa Tulungagung dhanang. prawira. nugraha. apt@gmail. com © Dhanang | 2017 HAL |1

REFERENSI WAJIB © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|2

REFERENSI WAJIB © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|2

REFERENCES REQUIRED 1. Dipiro, joseph T. , Talbert. Robert L. , Yee, Gary C.

REFERENCES REQUIRED 1. Dipiro, joseph T. , Talbert. Robert L. , Yee, Gary C. , Matzke, Gary R. , Wells, Barbara G. , Posey, L. Michael. , 2011, PHARMACOTHERAPY A PATHOPHISIOLOGIC APPROACH 8 TH EDITION, New York, Mc. Graw Hill 2. Alldredge, Brian L. , Corelli, Robin L. , Ernst Michael E. , Guglielmo B. Joseph. , Jacobson, Pamala A. , Kardjan, Wayne A. , Williams, Bradley R. , 2013, KODA-KIMBLE & YOUNG’S APPLIED THERAPEUTIC OF CLINICAL USE OF DRUGS. Philadelphia, Lippincot williams & wilkins, 3. Neal, Michael J. , 2012. , MEDICAL PHARMACOLOGY AT A GLANCE, london, wiley-blackwell 4. Brunton, Laurence L. , Chabner, Bruce A. , Knollman, Bjorn C. , 2012, GOODMAN GILLMAN THE PHARMACOLOGICAL BASIS OF THERAPEUTIC, 12 TH EDITION. , New York. , Mc. Graw Hill. 5. Cipolle, Robert J. Cipolle, Peter C. Morley, and Robert J. Cipolle. 2012. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE PRACTICE. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill. 6. Kasper, Dennis L. , Hauser, Stephen L. , Jameson, J. Larry. , Fauci, Anthony S. , Longo, Dan L. , Loscalzo, Joseph. , HARISSON’S PRINCIPLE INTERNAL MEDICINE 19 TH EDITION. , New York. , Mc. Graw Hill 7. Walker. , Roger. , Whittlesea, Cate. , 2012, CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, London, Churchill livingstone. 8. Chisholm-Burns MA, Wells BG, Schwinghammer TL, Malone P, Kolesar J, Rotschafer J, et al. PHARMACOTHERAPY PRINCIPLES & PRACTICE. Mc. Graw-Hill New York; 2010. 9. Sukandar E yulinah, Andrajati R, Sigit JI, Adayana IK, Setiadi antonius A priyatno, Kusnandar. Iso Farmakoterapi. penerbit ISFI; 2008. 10. Widyawati, PRAKTEK FARMASI KLINIK FOKUS PADA PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, Brilian Internasional, 2014 11. Scwinghammer, Terry L. , Koehler, Julia M. , 2011, PHARMACOTHERAPY CASEBOOK A PATIENT-FOCUSED APPROACH 8 TH EDITION. , New York, Mc. Graw Hill 12. Dhillon , Soraya. , Raymond, Rebekah. , 2009, PHARMACY CASE STUDY, London, Pharmaceutical Press © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|3

OUTLINES © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|4

OUTLINES © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|4

INTRODUCTION Documentation in clinical pharmacy • If you didn’t document it, you didn’t do

INTRODUCTION Documentation in clinical pharmacy • If you didn’t document it, you didn’t do it, ” is a common mantra in many fields of health care. Pharmacists have experience maintaining prescription records, but many lack experience documenting patient care activities. More comprehensive documentation practices are essential when pharmacists implement patient care services, • Documentation helps to ensure the delivery of high-quality patient care. Cipolle, Strand, and Morley, pioneers of pharmaceutical care, have written, “If you are not documenting the care you provide in a comprehensive manner, then you do not have a practice. ” (Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC, 2004) © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|5

INTRODUCTION Communication in clinical pharmacy • Communication is the backbone of pharmacy practice and

INTRODUCTION Communication in clinical pharmacy • Communication is the backbone of pharmacy practice and health care. But if you are shy or intimidated by others, then you need to find a way to organize your thoughts and get your message across without getting sidetracked or wasting anyone's time, including your own. © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|6

INTRODUCTION Etiquette for Communicating With Prescribers • It is important to carefully word recommendations

INTRODUCTION Etiquette for Communicating With Prescribers • It is important to carefully word recommendations that are sent to prescribers. Many prescribers recognize the value that pharmacists bring to the patient care team. • pharmacists may encounter resistance from prescribers and should strive to carefully word all recommendations so that prescribers do not feel that their judgments are coming under attack or that the pharmacist’s documentation leaves them exposed legally © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|7

INTRODUCTION • Communication in health care team – Writen • • • SOAP (subjektif,

INTRODUCTION • Communication in health care team – Writen • • • SOAP (subjektif, objektif, assesment, plan) FARM (finding, Assesment, recomendation, monitoring) PAM (problem, Assesment, monitoring) CORE (condition, outcome, recomendation, evaluation PRIME (pharmaceutical, risk, interaction, mismatch, efficacy) – Verbal: • SBAR (situation, background, assesment, recomendation) • S. O. A. P is one of common communication method between prescribers, nurse anf pharmacist in health care team according profesional competence • S. O. A. P is implementation of pharmaceutical care from pharmacist • S. O. A. P is one of documentation in clinical pharmacy practice in hospital, clinic or pharmacy © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|8

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE PLAN • Assesment Care plan Follow up Drug Related Problems monitoring Evaluation

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE PLAN • Assesment Care plan Follow up Drug Related Problems monitoring Evaluation Patient database • Subjektif • Objektif • Medical Problem • Therapy recomendation Counseling © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|9

S. O. A. P PATIENT DATABASE IDENTITY & CHARACTERISTIC SUBJECTIF DATA OBJECTIF DATA MEDICAL

S. O. A. P PATIENT DATABASE IDENTITY & CHARACTERISTIC SUBJECTIF DATA OBJECTIF DATA MEDICAL PROBLEMS THERAPY FUTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED (FIR) © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|10

S. O. A. P PATIENT DATABASE • Arrange patient database can be done with

S. O. A. P PATIENT DATABASE • Arrange patient database can be done with – Medical record – Patient/family interview © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|11

S. O. A. P • • • IDENTITY & PATIENT CHARACTERISTIC Demographic patient medical

S. O. A. P • • • IDENTITY & PATIENT CHARACTERISTIC Demographic patient medical history Drug history Allergy Social history Family history © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|12

S. O. A. P SUBJECTIF DATA • data form patient, family or other people

S. O. A. P SUBJECTIF DATA • data form patient, family or other people can’t be confirm indepently that support medical problem – – – – Nausea Pain Headache Dizziness faint Drug complient form patient ETC • Drug or medical history from patient can’t confirm include in subjectif data © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|13

S. O. A. P OBJECTIF DATA • data form obsevation, measuring that other profesion

S. O. A. P OBJECTIF DATA • data form obsevation, measuring that other profesion did, that support medical problem & influence drug therapy – – – – – Vital sign Lab value X-ray CT-scan Clearance cretinine Pharmacokinetic profile Half life Protein bound ETC • Drug or medical history from patient can confirm include in objectif data © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|14

S. O. A. P MEDICAL PROBLEMS • MEDICAL PROBLEMS – – Patient complients Abnormality

S. O. A. P MEDICAL PROBLEMS • MEDICAL PROBLEMS – – Patient complients Abnormality laboratory & examination value Disease or syndrome form clinician Drug related problems • the distinction between medical problems and drug-related problems sometimes is unclear, and considerable overlap exists. • Likewise, a drug-related problem can cause or aggravate a medical problem. Such drug-related problems could include hypersensitivity reactions; idiosyncratic reactions; toxic reactions secondary to excessive doses; adverse reactions © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|15

S. O. A. P MEDICAL THERAPY • THERAPY is the current drug therapy for

S. O. A. P MEDICAL THERAPY • THERAPY is the current drug therapy for now the preventive, curative support medical problem • The therapy database include – Name – Dose – Posology – Frequency – Administration (PO; IV; SC; drip; Nebulizer; Topical) © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|16

S. O. A. P FUTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED (FIR) • FUTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED (FIR) Question

S. O. A. P FUTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED (FIR) • FUTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED (FIR) Question to patient or family to get information for analysis drug therapy, monitory and evalution. FIR must support medical problem & influence drug therapy © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|17

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • After subjectif, objectif & medical problem gathered pharmacist

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • After subjectif, objectif & medical problem gathered pharmacist should assess acuity, severity, and importance of these problems. • he assessment is usually performed during or immediately after the data gathering while the provider keeps in mind evidence-based practices • Assessment must rational & according newest medical guideline or research publication © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|18

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Assessment writen as DRP (Drug Related Problems) •

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Assessment writen as DRP (Drug Related Problems) • Terms that used in medical record not rigid but explain the problems • In practice should nof follow catergory in clinical pharmacy such as PCNE and ASHP • For the academic purpose should use a category in clinical pharmacy © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|19

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Don’t use a jugment sentence in DRP writing

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Don’t use a jugment sentence in DRP writing such as “Wrong”, “not correct” “error” “not adequate” “wrong dose” “wrong administration””wrong route” – Dosis glimepride pada pasien tersebut salah – Penggunaan antiplatet tidak tepat pada pasien tersebut – Seharusnya penggunaan ISDN digunakan subligual • use a advice santence to write DRP “recomended” “should” “proper” “advisable” – Sebaiknya ISDN digunakan secara sublingual – dosis glimepiride tidak adequat masih pada pasien tersebut karena kadar gula darahnya puasa 324 mg/dl – Penggunaan antikoagulan lebih baik pada pasien tersebut © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|20

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • The therapeutic appropriateness of the patient’s drug regimen,

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • The therapeutic appropriateness of the patient’s drug regimen, including the route and method of administration. • Therapeutic duplication in the patient’s drug regimen. • The degree of patient compliance with the prescribed drug regimen. • Actual and potential drug–drug, drug–food, drug– laboratory test, and drug–disease interactions. • Clinical and pharmacokinetic laboratory data pertinent to the drug regimen. • Actual and potential drug toxicity and adverse effects. © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|21

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Pharmacist make plan based DRP which found in

S. O. A. P ASSESSMENT • Pharmacist make plan based DRP which found in the patient • Plan contain – Therapy recomendation include dose, posology and duration – Therapy monitoring • Effectivity • Side effect or adverse drug rection – Couseling • Those three thing not should to do together © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|22

S. O. A. P PLAN • Don’t use “command” or “order” such as –

S. O. A. P PLAN • Don’t use “command” or “order” such as – – – Dosis paracetamol harus diturunkan menjadi 3 x 500 mg hentikan penggunakan ciprofloxacin karena tidak rasional Monitor kadar kalium darah pasien Harus monitor kadar gula darah pasien Ganti gemfibrozil ke atorvastatin • Proper use “advise” sentence – Sebaiknya dosis paracetamol diturunkan menjadi 3 x 500 mg – Disarakan penggunaan ciprofloxacin dihentikan karena penggunaannya tidak tepat pada pasien bayi karena dapat mengganggu pertumbuhan cartilago pasien – Disarankan kadar kalium pasien dimonitor untuk menghindari efek samping hipokalemia – Pada kondisi pasien tersebut lebih bijak jika dilakukan monitoring kadar gula darah untuk memonitor efektivitas terapi – Bila kontrol trigliserida sulit dicapai maka sebaiknya terapi gemfibrozil diganti dengan atorvastatin © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|23

S. O. A. P CASE Tn X usia 60 tahun 70 kg no RM

S. O. A. P CASE Tn X usia 60 tahun 70 kg no RM 02 -02 -02 -05 dirawat di bangsal bedah mulai tanggal 10 februari 2016 dikarenakan mengalami patah tulang paha setelah terjatuh di kamar mandi. Tn X hidup bertiga bersama cucu dan seorang asisten pasien mempunyai riwayat asma sejak kecil dan menggunakan berotec® inhaler selama 3 tahun terakhir pasien mempunyai riwayat alergi paracetamol dan methampyron. Hasil X-ray menunjukkan adanya 3 patahan pada tulang paha kirinya. Setelah menjalani operasi Tn X mengalami demam, menggigil dan nyeri pada bekas operasi dengan skala 6. TTV: TD 130/90 mm. Hg; RR 24; nadi 90; T 38, 70 C sedangkan hasil lab pasien WBC 15. 200; Hb 12, 3%; gula darah acak 120 mg/dl; kreatinin serum 0, 9 mg/dl, Na: 140 m. Eq/L; K: 4, 0 m. Eq/L; Cl: 110 m. Eq/L; kolesterol: 180 mf/dl; asam urat: 6, 5 mg/dl. Selama dirumah sakit pasien mendapakan profenid® suppo 3 x 1 suppo; calcos® tablet 3 x 1 tablet; primperan® inj 3 x 1; acran® 150 mg/5 ml inj 3 x 1; zythromax® 250 mg 1 x 1 dan ciprofloxacin 500 mg 2 x 1. luka operasi mengeluarkan nanah dan jahitan tidak menutup secara sempurna © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|24

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Demografi pasien – – • Tn X

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Demografi pasien – – • Tn X 60 thn 70 kg Masuk rumah sakit 10/02/16 Riwayat penyakit dahulu – Asma • Riwayat pengobatan – Berotec inhaler • Allergi – Paracetamol & methampyron • Riwayat sosial – Pasien tinggal bersama cucu dan assisten rumah tangga • Riwayat keluarga – Tidak diketahui © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|25

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Subjektif – Pasien nyeri skala 6 ©

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Subjektif – Pasien nyeri skala 6 © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|26

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Objektif – Suhu tubuh 38, 70 C

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Objektif – Suhu tubuh 38, 70 C – luka operasi mengeluarkan nanah dan jahitan tidak menutup – WBC 15. 200 – Hasil X-ray ada 3 patahan pada tulang paha © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|27

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Problem Medik – Infeksi luka operasi ©

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Problem Medik – Infeksi luka operasi © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|28

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Terapi obat – Cythromax® 250 mg 1

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Terapi obat – Cythromax® 250 mg 1 x 1 – Ciprofloxacin 500 mg 2 x 1. © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|29

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Assessment – Kondisi pasien memburuk dikarenakan adanya

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Assessment – Kondisi pasien memburuk dikarenakan adanya infeksi luka operasi yang belum tertangain dengan baik hal ini ditunjukkan dengan adanya nanah dan luka yang belum menutup dengan sempurna, disertai peningkatan leukosit 15. 200 dan suhu tubuh 38, 70 C © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|30

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • DRP – Antibiotik belum adekuat untuk mengatasi

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • DRP – Antibiotik belum adekuat untuk mengatasi infeksi luka operasi © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|31

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Plan – Disarankan menggantibiotik yang sekarang digunakan

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Plan – Disarankan menggantibiotik yang sekarang digunakan menjadi injeksi cefazoline karena memiliki penetrasi yang baik sampai ke tulang dengan dosis 0, 5 – 1 gram IV 3 kali sehari – Monitoring efektivitas: suhu tubuh, WBC, nanah yang ada serta jahitan operasi – Monitoring ESO: kreatinin serum, SGPT, SGOT, reaksi alergi – Konseling: konseling kepada cucu dan asisten bagaimana cara merawat luka dan menggunakan suppositoria © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|32

S. O. A. P CASE S Pasien nyeri O • • A PM S,

S. O. A. P CASE S Pasien nyeri O • • A PM S, O TERAPI ANALISIS Infeksi luka operas S. D. A • Zythromax® 250 mg 1 x 1 • Ciprofloxacin 500 mg 2 x 1. Terdapat infeksi luka Terapi tidak operasi sebaiknya adekuat terapi dirubah karena tidak adekuat P Suhu tubuh 38, 70 C luka operasi mengeluarkan nanah dan jahitan tidak menutup WBC 15. 200 Hasil X-ray ada 3 patahan pada tulang paha DRP • Disarankan menggantibiotik yang sekarang digunakan menjadi injeksi cefazoline karena memiliki penetrasi yang baik sampai ke tulang dengan dosis 0, 5 – 1 gram IV 3 kali sehari • Monitoring efektivitas: suhu tubuh, WBC, nanah yang ada serta jahitan operasi • Monitoring ESO: kreatinin serum, SGPT, SGOT, reaksi alergi • Konseling: konseling kepada ©cucu dan asisten bagaimana cara merawat luka Dhanang | 2017 HAL|33 dan menggunakan suppositoria

S. O. A. P STEP BY STEP 1. Check drug name, compotitions, dose 2.

S. O. A. P STEP BY STEP 1. Check drug name, compotitions, dose 2. common reason and analysis according disease, patients and drug 3. Spesific reason and Analysis according on guidelines or research publication, protocol 4. Compare with guidelines, research publication, protocol 5. Chose the best recomendation and the reason © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|34

S. B. A. R INTRODUCTION • Pharmacist find DRP that needs to be resolved

S. B. A. R INTRODUCTION • Pharmacist find DRP that needs to be resolved immedietly, so that recomendation delivered verbally or by phone. • Verbally recomendation delivered by S. B. A. R format and documented by S. B. A. R format too • S. B. A. R is a acronym of – S = situation – B = backgroun – A = Assessment – R = recomendation © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|35

S. B. A. R INTRODUCTION • Before we deliver recomendation orally using S. B.

S. B. A. R INTRODUCTION • Before we deliver recomendation orally using S. B. A. R format we say greetings and mention our identity to the doctor • We mentioning situation, background, assesment and recomendation in sequence and to say thanks • After we delivered orally, it documented in medical record, registration should be accompanied by date, date and initial from the doctor and pharmacist © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|36

S. B. A. R SITUATION • S = Situation What happen with patients? –

S. B. A. R SITUATION • S = Situation What happen with patients? – patient name – Patien room/medical record number – Vital sign or laboratory value that changing or patien condition “pasien Tn X mendapatkan metoprolol dan atenolol dari dokter yang berbeda” “pasien Ny Y kamar 2 A mengalami bengkak pada kedua matanya” “pasien Tn Z nomer RM 01 -01 -00 -01 mengalami penurunan tekanan darah, sekarang tekanan darahnya 80/40 mm. Hg” © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|37

S. B. A. R BACKGROUND • B = background What is clinical background or

S. B. A. R BACKGROUND • B = background What is clinical background or context? – Patient condion – Drug name – Drug dose – Drug use – Drug administration “atenolol tablet 50 mg 1 x sehari diresepkan oleh dokter A dan metoprolol tablet 100 mg 2 x sehari diresepkan oleh dokter B, Sp. JP diindikasikan untuk hipertensi ” “pasien mengalami stroke dan mendapatkan terapi ketorilac injeksi 30 mg 2 kali sehari untuk mengatasi nyeri kepala yang berat” “Tn Z mengalai gagal jantung stage 4 dan telah mengalami dekompensasi, serta adanya cardiomegali pada hasil rongten” © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|38

S. B. A. R ASSESSMENT • A = assessment What i think a problem

S. B. A. R ASSESSMENT • A = assessment What i think a problem is? – Analysis problem from the guidelines, research publication, drug spesialite, ETC “karena metoprolol dan atenolol keduanya beta blocker yang bekerja secara selektif pada reseptor beta 1 sehingga akan berbahaya karena akan menurunkan nadi dan tekanan darah pasien” “kelopak mata yang bengkak pada Ny Y merupakan akibat dari reaksi hipersensitivitas terhadap NSAID dalam hal ini adalah reaksi hipersensitif terhadap ketorolac” “tekanan darah yang terus turun pada pasien gagal jantung dapat berakibat fatal sehingga perlu ditingkatkan dengan menggunakan obatan” © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|39

S. B. A. R RECOMENDATION • R = recomendation What would i recomend? –

S. B. A. R RECOMENDATION • R = recomendation What would i recomend? – Recomendation if approved by doctor or if not apporved by docter it still documented and include tha doctors disagree – Drug name – Drug dose – Drug administration “gunakan salah satu untuk menghindari reaksi obat yang tidak diinginkan” “hentikan penggunaan ketorolac dan ganti dengan menggunakan tramadol injeksi 3 x 1 ampul dan tablet amitriptilin 3 x 1 tablet” “gunakan drip dopamin 300 mcg/menit , dobutamin 180 mcg/menit dan norepinephrine 4 mcg/menit © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|40

S. B. A. R STEP BY STEP • Do your research ahead of time

S. B. A. R STEP BY STEP • Do your research ahead of time and organize your thoughts. Figure out what you need to say using the 4 components of SBAR. If you're calling a physician, write down on a piece of paper what you're calling about. • Take out the fluff, but make sure to include relevant, important information. • Have the paper ready when you make the call. If you feel nervous or get someone who is argumentative, you can always lean back on the sheet for guidance. • Sometimes, you can cover the background assessment together, because they are more than likely related. • Listen closely in case the person on the other end of the conversation offers a point you hadn't thought about. © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|41

LATIHAN • BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Ny y datang dengan keluhan nyeri terutama pada malam

LATIHAN • BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Ny y datang dengan keluhan nyeri terutama pada malam hari nyeri akan hilang dengan makan terkadang hal tersebut tidak membantu, pekerjaan ny X adalah seorang direktur perusahaan ekspor impor dan mengkonsumsi kopi atau teh 5 gelas perhari. Pasien merasakan mual, kembung dan sendawa tanpa disertai dengan muntah. Riwayat keluarga ayah penyakit jantung koroner dan stroke , ibu diabetes dan kanker payudara, kakak kandungnya mempunyai riwayat hipertensi hiperkolesterolema. tinggi badan 145 cm, berat badan 70 kg, TD 110/90 mm. Hg, nadi 90, RR 16 kali permenit, suhu tubun 37, 5 o. C. Na 142 m. Eq/L, K 4. 7 m. Eq/L, Cl 98 m. Eq/L, Hb 10. 1 g/d. L, Hct 30%, Plt 320 × 103/mm 3, Albumin 5. 0 g/d. L Selama perawatan pasien mendapatkan obat ondansentron inj 3 x 4 mg, antasida tab 3 x 1 tab, metoclopramide inj 3 x 2 ampul, ranitidine 3 x 2 ampul, sucralfat syr 3 x 10 ml © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|42

LATIHAN BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Tn A usia 34 tahun masuk RS dengan keluhan nyeri

LATIHAN BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Tn A usia 34 tahun masuk RS dengan keluhan nyeri perut bagian ulu hati, mual dan disertai dengan muntah, warna muntah berwarna kehitam-hitaman, pasien memiliki riwayat rheumatoid arthritis 10 tahun. skala nyeri pasien 8. hasil endoskopi pasien terdapat beberapa ulkus pada bagian lambung. pasien merokok 1 pak per hari. hasil pemeriksaan laboratorium Ig. G anti H. pylori (-), TTV: TD 120/80 mm. Hg; RR 24; nadi 90; T 38, 70 C sedangkan hasil lab pasien WBC 9. 200; Hb 12, 3%; gula darah acak 120 mg/dl; kreatinin serum 0, 9 mg/dl, Na: 89 m. Eq/L; K: 4, 0 m. Eq/L; Cl: 75 m. Eq/L, Hb 13, 0 g/dl. pasien rutin mengkonsumsi obat voltaren® 3 x 2 tab, lameson® 8 mg 3 x 1 tab, imuran® 1 x ½ tab. Diagosa dokter: ULKUS PEPTIK. Dokter meresepkan: nucral® 3 x 10 ml, Caprazol® 2 x 1 tab, acran® inj 3 x 2 ampul, mucosta® 3 x 1 tab, paracetamol tab 3 x 1 tab jika nyeri, infus Na. Cl 20 Tetes per menit © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|43

LATIHAN • BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Anak A no RM 57 -67 -00 -00 usia

LATIHAN • BUATLAH DATABASE PASIEN Anak A no RM 57 -67 -00 -00 usia 13 tahun berat badan 33 kg, pasien memiliki riwayat asma sejak bayi, pasien memiliki riwayat alergi debu dan alergi bulu, menggunakan ventolin nebulizer atau ventolin inhaler jika terjadi serangan asma. Pasien masuk ke RS dengan keluhan sesak nafas suhu 37, 4 o C. TD 100/70 mm. Hg, RR 40 kali permenit, nadi 120 kali per menit. Pasien mendapatkan combivent® nebulizer 2 x 1 vial, aminophyline inj 4, 6 mg/kg. BB, budesonide® turbuheler 3 x 100 unit dan acetilsystein 3 x 1 tab serta infus RL 10 tetes per menit © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|44

S O • • A PM S, O TERAPI Asma S. D. • combivent®

S O • • A PM S, O TERAPI Asma S. D. • combivent® nebulizer 2 x 1 A vial • aminophyline inj 4, 6 mg/kg. BB • budesonide®turbuheler 3 x 100 unit • acetilsystein 3 x 1 tab • infus RL 10 tetes per menit P S. O. A. P CASE Pasien sesak nafas 37, 40 C Suhu tubuh TD 100/70 mm. Hg, RR 40 kali permenit Nadi 120 kali per menit ANALISIS DRP Terapi tidak adekuat • Disarankan menggantibiotik yang sekarang digunakan menjadi injeksi cefazoline karena memiliki penetrasi yang baik sampai ke tulang dengan dosis 0, 5 – 1 gram IV 3 kali sehari • Monitoring efektivitas: suhu tubuh, WBC, nanah yang ada serta jahitan operasi • Monitoring ESO: kreatinin serum, SGPT, SGOT, reaksi alergi • Konseling: konseling kepada cucu dan asisten bagaimana cara merawat luka dan menggunakan suppositoria © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|45

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Demografi pasien – – • An. A

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Demografi pasien – – • An. A 13 thn 33 kg RM 57 -67 -00 -00 Riwayat penyakit dahulu – Asma • Riwayat pengobatan ventolin nebulizer atau ventolin inhaler • Allergi – Alergi debu dan alergi bulu • Riwayat sosial – Tidak diketahui • Riwayat keluarga – Tidak diketahui © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|46

S. O. A. P CASE • Subjektif – Pasien mengeluh sesak nafas © Dhanang

S. O. A. P CASE • Subjektif – Pasien mengeluh sesak nafas © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|47

S. O. A. P CASE • Objektif Suhu tubuh 37, 40 C TD 100/70

S. O. A. P CASE • Objektif Suhu tubuh 37, 40 C TD 100/70 mm. Hg, RR 40 kali permenit Nadi 120 kali per menit © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|48

S. O. A. P CASE • Problem Medik – Asma © Dhanang | 2017

S. O. A. P CASE • Problem Medik – Asma © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|49

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Terapi obat ü ü ü combivent® nebulizer

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Terapi obat ü ü ü combivent® nebulizer 2 x 1 vial aminophyline inj 4, 6 mg/kg. BB budesonide®turbuheler 3 x 100 unit acetilsystein 3 x 1 tab infus RL 10 tetes per menit © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|50

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Assessment © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|51

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Assessment © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|51

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • DRP – Antibiotik belum adekuat untuk mengatasi

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • DRP – Antibiotik belum adekuat untuk mengatasi infeksi luka operasi © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|52

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Plan – Disarankan – Monitoring efektivitas: suhu

S. O. A. P CASE CONTOH: • Plan – Disarankan – Monitoring efektivitas: suhu tubuh, WBC, nanah yang ada serta jahitan operasi – Monitoring ESO: kreatinin serum, SGPT, SGOT, reaksi alergi – Konseling: konseling kepada cucu dan asisten bagaimana cara merawat luka dan menggunakan suppositoria © Dhanang | 2017 HAL|53

© Dhanang | 2017 HAL|54

© Dhanang | 2017 HAL|54