Master Trainers Training Rajeev Chawla IAS Court Commissioner

Master Trainers Training Rajeev Chawla, IAS Court Commissioner

Objective of Hon’ble High Court Order • To identify all Government lands – Land available with the Government after all grants are identified surveyed and regularized. – All Kharab B lands – government lands within Private lands – Alienated or Agricultural. – Alienated land. – All Acquired land. – To record all restrictions including PTCL land. • Mark all these lands in the Bhoomi database – So that no transactions are carried out in SRO on these lands • Revenue Department issued Circular on 11 th October 2013 – guidelines to fill 24 column format along with Form 1 -5 (for Granted land).

Observations • Revenue Department issued Circular on 11 th October 2013 – Where a 24 col format was provided and Tahsildars were asked to fill the format along with Form 1 -5 (for Granted land). The following are the short coming in the RD circular • Listing out the all Government Land Survey Numbers not possible • The 24 col format could not be used to identify the available Government Land • In cases where the land is acquired or alienated partially in a particular survey number no option to fill the information

Contd… • Flagging of Pyki RTCs • How to enter the details where phodi has been incorporated in Akarband but not incorporated in RTC • How to identify Karab A & B in case of pyki RTCs • Form 1 -24 data can only be used for the following purposes only – Flagging of Full extent of Acquired Land incorporation of the details in the Bhoomi. – Flagging of Full extent of Alienated Land incorporation of the details in the Bhoomi – KARAB A & B details of survey numbers which has an entry in the Akarband in a private survey number (other than Pyki RTCs)

Contd. . • During the inspection in Bijapur District and other Divisional reviews the following issues have been observed. – – Form 1 -5 has not been filled as per the Circular Most of data is filled based only on the RTC. The forms have been filled village wise and not survey number wise. The major concerned raised was non availability of Files and Registers for filling form 1 -5. • This shows that Indexing and Cataloguing has not been done as per the instructions in the circular. – Tahsildars have not written to all the Land Acquiring agencies to provide the copy of the final notification

What needs to be done • To achieve the objective of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka The activity shall be divided two parts – Identification of Government Land – Identification of Karab A & B, Acquired and Alienated lands within a private survey number

Identification of Government Land • Purpose of this activity: – – To identify the land available with the Government. To identify lands coming under PTCL. To identify the restrictions on Government land. To identify Acquired and Alienated details with in a Govt land • Activities – Identification of Government Land – Parent survey number and child survey number. – Indexing and cataloguing of registers and files pertaining to land grants. – Filling of Form 1 -5 is only after cataloguing and indexing of all land grants related files and registers. – Ensure filling up of form 1 -5 is based on exhaustive efforts of searching the above files –not on RTC

Identification of Parent and Child Survey Numbers • Identify the government land survey numbers from the akarbandh – Parent survey number and all the new survey numbers created out of it needs to be identified. – LR Tippans maintained village wise is source for identifying the new numbers created out of any government land survey number. • Identification of survey numbers which are assessed waste and udafe survey numbers from the RTC

Contd… • Parent Survey Number: Those survey numbers the extents of which are entered only in 4, 5(b) and 5(c) columns of the akarbandh. No cultivable extent is mentioned and assessment has not been fixed for such numbers. • These are the survey numbers for which Form 1 -5 has to be filled. • It may not be possible to identify these numbers from the RTC because in case the entire extent is already granted then there would be no RTC where it is mentioned as Government – Sarkari – in Column 9.

Contd… Child Survey Number: • Those survey numbers which are created newly after the phodi durasti of land grant darkasth cases – can be identified easily from the L. R. Tippan book maintained village wise for each village in record room of survey section. • Assessed waste – these are government lands for which assessment has been fixed and they vest with the Government. These are to be identified from the RTC as it would look like any other private survey number in the akarbandh. • Udafe survey number – These are survey numbers which are non-contiguous to the parent survey numbers. They are created at the time of survey as they are dis-connected from the parent survey number and are indicating as still vesting with the Government. Assessment might or might not have been fixed for these numbers.

Original Prathi Book Extract showing Parent Sy. No 70 and its extent Sy No Total Extent Kharab Net Extent 70 11. 30 -

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 70 Child Survey No : 107 Extent 1. 20 - 1. 20

Remaining extent of Parent Sy No 70 Sy No Total Extent Kharab Net Extent 70 10. 10 -

Identification of Government Land - Source Akarbandh Sy No Col. No 4 Col No 5 B Col No 5 C Col. No 28 & 29 2 8. 02 Nil

Identification of Government Land…contd. . Sy No Col. No 4 Col No 5 B Col No 5 C Col. No 28 & 29 66 2. 14 Nil 70 11. 30 Nil

Identification of Government Land Survey No 87 Sy No Col. No 4 Col No 5 B Col No 5 C Col. No 28 & 29 87 4. 16 Nil

Chikkaluru Rampura – Parent Sy. No. and extent identification

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 14 Child Survey No 31, Extent : 2. 32 1. 02 1. 30

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 14 Child Survey No 32, Extent : 3. 14 1. 14 2. 00

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 14 Child Survey No 33, Extent : 0. 30 -

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 14 Child Survey No 34, Extent : 5. 10 1. 10 4. 00

L. R Tippan Indicating Parent Sy No: 14 Remaining Extent : 25. 25

Contd… • Prepare a list of: – Parent government land survey number and its extent. – New survey numbers created out of the parent survey number and their extents. – All the Pyki RTCs created out of the parent survey number and the newly created survey numbers. • The details needs to be filled in PROFORMA -1 • After listing out the parent and child survey numbers the same needs to be digitized using the software provided by Bhoomi Monitoring Cell.

Indexing and cataloguing Preparation of checklist and digitization of the same • – Files • • Subject category: (Eg - Land Grant/ Land Reforms, etc …. ) – Case pertaining to: ----- Taluk ---- hobli ----- village & ----- Survey No – (There can be multiple lines for this information as a file may pertain to multiple survey numbers or multiple villages also and it may also happen that sometime some of these parameters like hobli, village or survey numbers may not be available. – For example a Land Grant file may pertain to one or two survey numbers in a Village or some time all the land Grant transaction pertaining to a hobli may be handled in a single file)

Contd… – Registers • Type of Register: (Eg – Mutation Register, Index of lands & Records of Right, Saguvali chiti Register, Alienation case register, etc…. ) • Register pertaining to: ----- Taluk ---- hobli ----- village (Incase if a register is a taluk level register then hobli & village need not be mentioned) • As the Tahsildars are informing about non availability of files and registers it is not clear whether indexing activity has been completed. – If yes – is it done as per the Circular dated: 31. 08. 2009 – Then DCs should verify the correctness of the information by cross checking the details using the computerized data.

Filling of Form 1 -5 • All claimants on Government Land to be identified. • Sources for identifying the claimants: Grant Register Grants Proceedings register Official Memorandum Saguvali chit issue register Land Grant files Mutation Register RTC Register containing details of Form 50/53 applicants details Register/Files containing details of Lease Details Register/Files/Notifications containing details of transfer of government land to other departments o Notifications indicating acquisitions on Government lands. o o o o o

Contd… • All the claimants on Government Land to be identified and entered in Form 1 -5. • A format will be provided for capturing the PTCL and Government restrictions. This will be done only after completion of filling of form 1 -5. – The source of filling the Government restriction details are – OM/ Grant order – Grant Registers – Upset price challans • Based on Form 1 -5 survey to be done and Forms 6 -10 to be filled.

Contd… • After filling of Form 6 -10 decision as per prevailing circulars needs to be taken to: o Cancel the excess/fraudulent grants. o Restrict the excess enjoyments. o Pass modified orders where enjoyment extent is less than granted extent. o Cancel fake RTCs. o Reject ineligible Form 50/53 claimants. o Order phodi durasti of grantees where everything is in order • After the above decisions are taken the remaining lands are only land available with Government.

Other Government lands • Some survey numbers the entire extents are recorded in col 4, 5 (b) and 5 (c) of Akarband ( without any cultivable extent) • Some such lands are Gomal, Kere Gokatte • These lands are completely government lands • Details of these lands are to be covered in FORM 1 -5 without fail. • Other Government lands are Haddige hidida hall, Marga, Oni, Haddigehidida dari • These are the lands between two survey numbers and not part of any survey numbers. They are also not assigned any survey numbers • In case any grants have been made on the above type of land Form 1 -5 needs to be filled

What was expected while filling Form 1 -5 • Identifying Government land Survey Numbers. • Indexing and Cataloguing of grant related register and files. • Identifying the Claimants on Government Land. • Filling of Form 1 -5 survey number wise reason being: – The survey has to be carried out survey number wise. – File has to be created survey number wise. – Decisions have to be taken survey number wise. – Phodi durasti has to be done survey number wise.

Why Forms 1 -5 not to be filled only using RTC • RTC may not be there for all the claimants - In some cases RTC may not be there for a grantee. Such grants would be left out if the forms are filled based on RTC. • Where the entire extent is granted then there would be no RTC to indicate that it was a Government Land Sy. No. as the RTCs would be in the name of the grantees or subsequent buyers. • The name of the grantee cannot be identified from the RTC alone especially when multiple transactions have taken place.

Contd… • The lands leased may not be entered in RTC. Thereby filling Form. 3 would be a problem. • The lands transferred to forest and other departments are not updated in the RTC. Filling of Form 4 would be a problem. • Persons who have filed applications under Form 50/53 and squatting on the land cannot be identified from RTC.

Identification of Karab A & B, Acquired and Alienated lands within a private survey number

What is KHARAB? Rule 21(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act 1964 defines Pot Kharab as follows: “During the process of classification, land included as unarable shall be treated as "Pot Kharab". Pot Kharab land may be classified as follows: a) That which is classified as unfit for agriculture at the time of survey including the farm buildings or threshing flours of the holder; b) That which is not assessed because: i. it is reserved or assigned for public purpose; ii. it is occupied by a road or recognised footpath or by a tank or stream used by persons other than the holders for irrigation, drinking or domestic purposes; iii. used as burial ground or cremation ground; iv. assigned for villager potteries. "

Information of A and B KHARAB • In the akarbandh Col. 5(a) is the extent of ‘A’ Kharab and Col. 5(b) is extent of ‘B’Kharab. Col. 5(c) is the total of A and B kharab. • However in the akarbandh of some of the villages the kharab extents are entered neither in 5(a) or in 5(b) but the total kharab extent is mentioned in 5(c) column. • In such cases 5(c) extent should be shown appropriately in 5(a) or 5(b) through correction process. • The ADLR should send proposal for correction to DDLR by referring to the ‘Prathi’ book to decide whether the kharab is A or B kharab. If necessary the proposal may be submitted after field visit by ADLR.

Contd… • A detailed explanation about ‘Phut Kharab’ and kinds of phut kharab is narrated in Chapter V of the Karnataka Revenue Survey Manual Vol. II (Part 2) which covers the explanation about kharab in old Mysore, Belgaum Division, Ex-Hyderabad state area, Bellary and South Kanara Districts and also in Coorg District. • For complying to the Court direction the extent of B Kharab indicated in the akarbandh against each survey number has to be listed and correction in RTC to be done wherever necessary by following due procedure.

Identification of Kharab B lands • Kharab B lands are to be identified within private lands also • It has to be done for both Agricultural and non-agricultural lands – including layouts developed • The source of Kharab B lands is column 5 (B) of Akarbandh • The data of Kharab B Lands of Akarbandh to be compared to Kharab details of RTC. • Process to be initiated for correcting the data if required • In few cases Kharab is not classified as A and B but the total is recorded in column 5(C). • ADLR and DDLR has to examine Prathi book if necessary and indicate whether it is A or B Kharab.

How to fill KARAB details • Fill the Akarbandh Kharab details in the 24 column format and compare with the Kharab details of RTC. – Wherever there is mismatch in extent round the extent of RTC and write the correct extent in the format. – In case of pyki RTC were one entry is available in Akarbandh and more than one RTC are in the 24 column format create a separate column at the end of the 24 column format and indicate “Pyki” against each of the entry

Contd… – In case an entry is available in the Akarbandh and no Sy no entry is available in the RTC (where phodi is done but not incorporated in RTC). • Create one file for each of the village and keep the filled format for verification. • The procedure that needs to be followed in the Bhoomi software is illustrated in the next slides

Rectifying KHARAB-A and KHARAB-B extents in RTCs

Pre-requisites for rectifying KHARAB-A and KHARAB-B extents Ø Identification of Pyki (ಪ ಕ ) RTCs. Ø Amalgamation of Pyki (ಪ ಕ ) RTCs. Resulting in Ø Newly created / amalgamated / updated RTCs matching with corresponding extents of Akarbhandh.

Overview to Identify Pyki RTC RTC AKARBHAND RTC *EXTENTS COMPARISION AKARBHAND RTC ! RTC RTC ! & RTC & & RTC Division of RTC after Amalgamation Add RTC(s) ! Update / Delete RTC(s) No Changes) *Extents Comparison is done w. r. t the Total Extents, Karab A and Karab B of the Corresponding RTC and Akarbhand

Identification of Pyki (ಪ ಕ ) RTCs Scenario-1 Number of entries in Akarbhandh for a given Survey Number (@ time of Resurvey) is equal to number RTCs in BHOOMI database (including child survey numbers). Inference 1. If corresponding extents are matching => None of RTCs in BHOOMI pertaining to this survey number are PYKI. 2. If extents are not matching or partially matching => May not be pyki RTCs but rectification process is warranted

ILLUSTRATIONS Scenario-1 D N A BH R A Survey No Total AK A B C T R Extents Karab A Karab B Survey No Extents Total Karab A Karab B 1*1 1. 0. 0. 0 1*2 1. 0. 0 0. 10. 0. 0 1*1 1. 0. 0. 0 1*2 2. 20. 0 0. 20. 0 Extents matching Extents NOT matchin A NO PROBLEMS Solution B rectification process is warranted COURT ORDER MAY BE INITATED TO RECTIFY THE EXTENTS OF 1*2 by interchange Karab Area from A to B

Identification of Pyki (ಪ ಕ Scenario-2 ) RTCs Number of entries in Akarbhand for a given Survey Number (@ time of Resurvey) is more than number RTCs in BHOOMI database. Inference Nothing to do with pyki concept, Podi / Durasthi not incorporated into the RTC. 1. If sum of corresponding extents of akarbhandh matches with sum of corresponding extents of RTCs with or without regrouping => Necessary action may be initiated for incorporation of podi / durasthi. 2. If sum of corresponding extents of akarbhandh doesn’t match with sum of corresponding extents of RTCs with or without regrouping => Steps needs to be taken to identify the inconsistencies and rectify problem before incorporation

Scenario-2 D N A BH R ASurvey No AK A B ILLUSTRATIONS C T R Extents Total Karab A Karab B 1*1 1. 0. 0. 0 1*2 1. 0. 0 0. 10. 0. 0 A Survey No Extents Total Karab A Podi/durasthi to be initiated Karab B 1*1 2. 0. 0 0. 10. 0. 0 1*1 2. 10. 0. 0 Solution PODI TO BE INITIATED TO DIVIDE 1*1 TO 1*1 and 1*2 WITH EXTENTS AS 1. 0. 0 AND 1. 0. 0 ACRES Total Extents matching Extents NOT matchin rectification process is warranted B COURT ORDER MAY BE INITATED TO CORRECT THE EXTENTS IN 1*1 TO 1. 0. 0 ACRES AND CREATE A NEW RTC 1*2 WITH 2. 0. 0 ACRES

Identification of Pyki (ಪ ಕ ) RTCs Scenario-3 Number of entries in Akarbhand for a given Survey Number (@ time of Resurvey) is less than number RTCs in BHOOMI database. Inference All or some of RTCs for the survey number under consideration are pyki RTCs 1. If one or more of corresponding extents of akarbhand for a given combination of survey and hissa number matches with survey number and hissa number combination of any RTC(s) along with extents. => Podi / durasthi incorporation has been done and they are out the scope for amalgamation. 2. if corresponding extents of akarbhand for a given combination of survey and hissa number doesn’t match with survey number and hissa number combination of any RTC(s) along extents. => try matching by regrouping pyki RTCs using amalgamation option to remove pyki RTCs

Scenario-3 ND A H B ARSurvey No K A A Extents ILLUSTRATIONS C Karab B RT Survey No Extents Total Karab A Karab B 1*1 2. 0. 0 0. 10. 0. 0 1*2 2. 0. 0. 0 1*1 P 2 1. 0. 0. 0 Total Extents matching B 1*1 2. 0. 0 0. 2. 0 1*1 1. 0. 0 0. 2. 0 1*2 1. 30. 0 0. 2. 0 0. 0. 0 1*1 P 1 1. 0. 0. 0 1*3 1. 0. 0 0. 2. 0 0. 0. 0 1*2 P 2 0. 30. 0 0. 2. 0 0. 0. 0 1*2 P 2 1. 0. 0. 0 1*3 P 0. 30. 0. 0 1*3 0. 12. 0 0. 0. 0 Solution A COURT ORDER MAY BE INITATED TO RECTIFY 1*1 P 2 (DELETION OF RTC) Amalgamation process / Correction is warranted Extents NOT matchin B AMALGAMATION MAY BE INITATED TO CORRECT THE EXTENTS ACCORDINGLY

PODI AMALGAMATION OF Pyki RTCs software provisions Conditions ØAmalgamation allowed only if survey number portion of all the selected RTCs is same and target RTC survey number portion should be same as survey number portion of RTCs selected for amalgamation. Ø There should be at least two RTCs to amalgamate and should result into one or more RTC. ØIf any one of the owners in the RTC selected for division has owner category other than ‘PRV’ then ask for DC permission order number and scan the order copy. Steps Ø Select all Pyki RTCs of a Survey Number ( 1 / * / 1 P , 1 / * / 2 P , 1 / * / 3 P … ) Ø System Adds up the Above to a Amalgamated Survey Number (1 / * ) ü Provision to Change Hissa Number ü Provision to Add More Survey Number ü Provision to Select Pyki Survey Number for the Added survey Number 1 / * / 1 => 1 / * / 1 P , 1 / * / 2 P 1 / * / 2 => 1 / * / 3 P Ø All The owners are assigned to the Newly Created Survey Number

Pyki RTCs selected from Application Kiosk New RTC after Adding all the Pyki RTCs – Auto Generated with same Survey No.

Provision to Change Hissa No. , if required Provision to Add New Hissa No. , if requ

Provision to Add New Hissa No, and select Source Pyki RTCs

Newly Added RTC Owners Assigned

BEFORE AFTER

IMPACT ANALYSIS SCENARIO ACTION IMPACT New RTC to be created COURT ORDER IN BHOOMI Can create a new RTC with any extents and any number of owners can be created. Deletion of RTC Required COURT ORDER IN BHOOMI Deletion of RTC possible. Challenges if, any mutations have taken place in the desired RTC. Amalgamation PODI MUTATION IN BHOOMI Reassignment of new Hissa Numbers in a given Survey Number. Extents are validated. The Extents of the child RTC(s) (Pyki RTCs) should be equal to the extents of the parent RTC created newly. If the extents do not match, “RTC COURT ORDER “ NEEDS TO BE INITATED

Identification of Acquired lands • First task under this activity is to list out Taluk-wise Land Acquiring Agency details. • Create Land Acquiring Agency wise files – One file to each agency – Tahsildars should write to all the Land Acquiring Agencies to provide all the final notification of Acquisitions. • Copy of the letter should be placed in the file • Parallely Tahsildars should collect the Land acquisition details from the records in the taluk office. – Place all the collected notifications in the respective file

Contd…. • All the notification received from the Land Acquiring Agency should be placed in the respective file. – The Tahsildar should ensure completeness of the Land Acquired details that have been received • Wherever the Acquiring Agency has not replied Tahsildars should follow up and get the information – In case the Acquiring Agency is not cooperating with the Tahsildars, then those cases should be brought to the notice of DCs – DCs has to then follow it up with the Acquiring Agency and in case DCs are also not able to get the required information then bring it to the notice of the Government

Contd. . • Then start filling Form 1 -24 in respect of Land Acquisition cases. – Form 1 -24 does not have provision enter the partial extent acquired. – Therefore for such cases the information needs to be filled by in separate form • After filling the details in the forms check whether the land acquired details have been incorporated in the RTC. • Wherever the Land Acquisition details have not been incorporated, action should be taken to incorporate the same in the Bhoomi • After the incorporation action should be taken to carryout Acquisition Phodi in all survey numbers where a portion of a land is acquired.

Identification of Alienated lands – To check alienation registers and challan registers • Alienation registers of Taluk office may not be exhaustive as alienation is done at DC office • To check Akarband also to get details of KJP done for Alienated lands – Kharab details on Alienated land have to be identified for the following two types i. e • In case portion of Alienation is done on a multiple owner RTC – There is a need to identify whether the any portion of the kharab falls within the alienated area. • After the alienation process the land may be used formation of layout – In that case the public amenity details of Roads, Park, etc needs to be captured

Contd… • Then start filling Form 1 -24 in respect of Land Alienation cases. – Form 1 -24 does not have provision enter the partial extent acquired. – Therefore for such cases the information needs to be filled by in separate form • After filling the details in the forms check whether the Alienated details have been incorporated in the RTC. • Wherever the Alienation details have not been incorporated, action should be taken to incorporate the same in the Bhoomi

Contd… • After the first exercise, action should be taken to carry out alienation Phodi in all survey numbers where a portion of a land is alienated. • Once the alienation phodi is completed and durusti is done KHARAB A & B details can be known. • Then wherever layout has been created on the alienated portion Tahsildars have to get the details of approved Layout from the Local Planning Authority along with the extent of the public amenities in the alienated property. • Bhoomi Monitoring Cell will provide a software for incorporating these details at a later point of time

Verification

Why verification process cannot be outsourced ? • It is difficult to understand the entire process • Those involved in the verification process should know the purpose of filling first. • The verification cannot be a mechanical job – lot of interpretation and interlinking between the data sets is required. • Only those who have knowledge in both revenue and survey can undertake verification • Even though retired officials are engaged they cannot certify. – In case of the data is erroneous they cannot be held responsible

Contd… • Verification team should comprise Deputy Tahsildar, Survey supervisor, Revenue Inspector and Senior Surveyor • After the verification of this team Percentage check by Tahsildar, ADLR, AC, DDLR and ADC • During verification the higher officer has to verify part of verification done by subordinate officer • The verification officer should make a note of each of the survey numbers verified. – He should check the source documents also as part of verification

Verification of Form 1 -5 • While doing the verification the following needs to be observed: q. Whether Indexing and Cataloguing has been done for the grant related registers and files as per the Circular and whether check lists have been prepared. q. Forms 1 -5 should have been filled for each survey number and not village wise. Ex: If 5 Government Land Sy. Nos are there in a village - 5 separate Form 1 -5 should have been filled.

Contd… q Details of the source register/file referred, to fill the different columns of the forms should be mentioned. For Ex: ü In Form 1, Column 1: Name of grantee: Filled from Grant Register, Saguvali Chit Register and RTC. ü Column 6: No. & Date of Grant Resolution Proceedings Register: Filled from Grant Register q Whether the original survey number has been filled in the header of the form. q Whether the survey numbers which are newly created after phodi are mentioned in Form No. 1 at column 4.

Contd. . q. For each RTC there must be at least one supporting document – OM/Saguvali Chit/Entry in Proceedings register/Mutation copy. q. However if none of the supporting documents are there and only RTCs are then the same should be properly documented and certified by the DC. q. The registers and files that are Indexed and Catalogued have to be verified to confirm the above. q. The LR Tippan book to be verified to see if all the grants that are already phoded find a place in Form No. 1.

Verification of KARAB A & B details in a Private Survey number • Data filled in 24 Column form needs to be checked with the data of Akarabndh. • To check whether all Akarbandh details have been captured and matched with corresponding RTCs • Verify Kharab A & B of Akarabandh with Kharab A & B of RTC • To check whether all the mismatch identified in the 24 column format has been incorporated in Bhoomi • Are Pyki RTCs identified as indicated above. • Have all the pyki RTCs been amalgamated as indicated above

Verification of Land Acquisition details • To ensure that letters have been written to all acquiring authorities seeking information about acquisition. • Ensure that files are maintained Acquiring Agency wise and all the notifications are been made part of the file • In case of Partial extent, whether details have been entered • Check whether the acquiring details have been incorporated in Bhoomi

Verification of Alienated Land details • To check whether all registers pertaining to alienation are examined • To check whether challans are examined • To verify partial extent have been entered • To check whether entry is done as per the above procedure

Roles and Responsibilities of Master Trainers • Has to provide training to all the revenue officials on how to fill the form(s) • Regular review of the implementation. • Report the status to the core team on a weekly basis. – NOTE – wherever required another DDLR or another AC may be asked to support a district training group.

Responsibilities of each officer • ADC is completely responsible for ensuring proper work in respect of Indexing and Cataloguing in addition to percentage check of other data • AC is completely responsible for ensuring compilation of details about Kharab A and Kharab B, Alienation, Acquisition, PTCL and other government restrictions, ( 24 column format) • DDLR is completely responsible for compilation of form 1 -5 as per circular

Contd… • ADLR is completely responsible for identifying all Parent government lands and subsequent new private survey numbers formed out of the parent survey number. • Tahsildar is the officer to compile and correct if required as per the observation of verification team and Master trainer group

Thank you