March 2017 doc IEEE 802 11 170453 r

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 TGax MAC Ad-hoc March 2017 Meeting Agenda Date: March 13, 2017 Authors: Name Company Address Reza Hedayat Newracom Irvine, CA reza. hedayat at newracom. com Eric Wong Apple Cupertino, CA ericwong@apple. com Chao-Chun Wang Media. Tek Submission Phone E-mail chaochun. wang@mediatek. com Slide 1 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 IEEE 802. 11 TGax High Efficiency WLAN MAC Ad Hoc Co-Chairs: Reza Hedayat (NEWRACOM) Eric Wong (Apple) Chao-Chun Wang (Media. Tek) Submission Slide 2 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Agenda Items • • • Call meeting to order Patent policy, etc. (Call for Potentially Essential Patents) Call for submissions Set and approve agenda Note ad hoc rules – Slides 13 -14 • Note total 5 MAC ad hoc sessions this week – Monday PM 2 – Tuesday AM 2 and PM 2 – Wednesday PM 1 and PM 2 • Approve previous ad hoc session and telecon minutes – • • Typically TGax Full Technical Presentations approved by 802. 11 ax chair for presentation this week, and related straw polls Any other technical presentations Submission Slide 3 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Meeting Protocol, Attendance, Voting & Document Status • Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot • Cell Phones to be silent or Off • Register your attendance via https: //imat. ieee. org while on a meeting SSID (e. g. Verilan-secure) • Make sure your badges are correct • If you plan to make a submission, be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising • Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, Member’s Area – Contact Jon Rosdahl – jrosdahl@ieee. org Submission Slide 4 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Patent Policy and Other Guidelines • See the following 5 slides Submission Slide 5 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: – – Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: • The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; • Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; • There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. – Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: • That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard • Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. – The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6. 3. 5 and in FAQs 12 and 12 a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. – Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown) Submission Slide 6 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: – “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim, ” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims – “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) – The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6. 2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 Submission Slide 7 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/bylaws/sect 6 -7. html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3 Material about the patent policy is available at http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-material. html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat/index. html This slide set is available at http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt Slide #2 Submission Slide 8 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: – Either speak up now or – Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or – Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3 Submission Slide 9 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. – Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. – Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. – Technical considerations remain primary focus – Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. – Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. – Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. -------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 Submission Slide 10 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Submissions (MAC) Authors Ad-hoc Straw Polls 11 -17/0074 Explanations for CR on 27. 5. 2. 7 laurent cariou MAC 5 11 -17/0088 Discussion for CR on 10. 22. 2. 8 TXOP limits Woojin Ahn MAC CR 11 -17/0239 LB 225 -MAC-CR-HT Control subclause 9. 2. 4. 6. X and 10. 1 - Block 2 Alfred Asterjadhi MAC CR 11 -17/0240 LB 225 -MAC-CR-HT Control subclause 9. 2. 4. 6. X and 10. 1 - Block 3 Alfred Asterjadhi MAC CR Raja Banerjea MAC CR 11 -17/0319 CRs for Section 27. 4 George Cherian MAC CR 11 -17/0353 LB 225 -CRs-on-OFDMA-based-random-access-Response Suhwook Kim MAC CR 11 -17/0346 LB 225 CR on TXOP Truncation (10. 22. 2. 9) Jeongki Kim MAC CR 11 -17/0359 mac-cr-CS Required-9 -3 -1 -23 Raja Banerjea MAC CR Kaiying Lv MAC CR 11 -17/0443 LB 225 -CRs-on-OFDMA-based-random-access-Figure Suhwook Kim MAC CR 11 -17/0384 LB 225, Comment resolution for 10. 24. 10 Reza Hedayat MAC CR 11 -17/0445 CR on Per-TID All Ack in Multi-STA Block. Ack Frame Geonjung Ko MAC CR Liwen Chu MAC CR DCN Title 11 -17/0283 lb 225 -mac-cr-9 -3 -1 -23 11 -17/0389 CIDs-for-27 -2 -1 -part 1 11 -17/0341 LB 225 11 ax D 1. 0 Comment Resolution 10. 13 Submission Slide 11 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Submissions (MAC) Authors Ad-hoc Straw Polls 11 -17/0344 LB 225 CR on EIFS and TXOP_DURATION (10. 3. 2. 3. 7 and 27. 11. 5) Jeongki Kim MAC CR 11 -17/0347 LB 225 CR on Intra-PPDU PS (27. 14. 1) Jeongki Kim MAC CR Chao-Chun Wang MAC -- Jing Ma MAC CR 11 -17/360 LB 225 CR for CID 5917 and CID 8165 Ming Gan MAC -- 11 -17/0361 BSS Load Information in 802. 11 ax Ming Gan MAC -- 11 -17/0362 LB 225 CR for Subclause 9. 4. 2. 218. 2 Ming Gan MAC CR 11 -17/0395 225 -CR-on-Pre-association Ming Gan MAC CR 11 -17/0396 Association Exchange using Contention based UL OFDMA Ming Gan MAC CR Alfred Asterjadhi MAC -- Frank Hsu MAC -- 11 -17/0477 Buffer status report laurent cariou MAC CR 11 -17/0281 Comment resolutions for clause 27. 8 Jarkko Kneckt MAC CR George Cherian MAC CR DCN Title 11 -17/0421 cr-for-11. 49 -HE BSS operation 11 -17/0448 Proposed resolution for comments related to CIDs in 27. 5. 2 11 -13/0285 LB 225 -MAC-CR-HE MCS_NSS resolutions 11 -17/0308 CR for section 9. 4. 2 BSS load PPT Green: Completed with at least one passing pre-Motion 11 -17/0306 CRs for Section 9. 3. 1. 8 & 9. 3. 1. 9. 7 Red: Completed with no passing pre-Motion Blue: Partially completed presentation Submission Slide 12 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Ad Hoc Groups Operation (1/2) Governing document is 15/075 r 0 • • • Proposed changes to the specification framework shall be discussed in the ad hoc groups first, which are then brought to the Taskgroup for an approval vote. A straw poll (doesn’t require voting rights) result of >=75% is required within an Ad Hoc to approve the resolution of all or part of an issue and forward that resolved item to the Taskgroup where it becomes a motion that requires >=75% approval to modify the specification framework or the draft specification. The straw poll affection the TG specification framework shall include Do you agree to add to the TG Specification Framework: x. y. z. [brief description of the feature] • In the case a consensus can not be reached within an Ad Hoc group (a stalemate that prohibits further progress), the subject is moved to the Taskgroup if an Ad Hoc straw poll vote to move the subject to the Taskgroup achieves >50% approval. Submission Slide 13 Eric Wong (Apple)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Ad Hoc Groups Operation (2/2) Governing document is 15/075 r 0 • • • A motion passing with >50% in the Taskgroup shall be sufficient to move an issue previously assigned to an Ad Hoc group to any Ad Hoc group. A straw poll vote of >50% is required in an Ad Hoc group to refuse an issue from the Taskgroup. An issue may be sent from one Ad Hoc to another if both the sending Ad Hoc and the receiving Ad Hoc approve straw polls for taking the respective actions with >50% approval. A notice should be sent to the reflector indicating the approval of a straw poll to move an issue. During Taskgroup face to face Plenary and Interim sessions, Chairs for each of the Functional Block Ad Hocs shall report on Progress and Content to the Entire Taskgroup. These Update sessions provide the opportunity for peer review to ensure the creation of a coherent Specification. Submission Slide 14 Eric Wong (Apple)

March, 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll #1 (1117 -0074 -02 -00 ax-explanations-for-cr-on-27 -5 -2 -7. pptx-) • Which option do you prefer? – STAs scheduled by a NDP feedback report trigger frame variant with a feedback type set to “resource request” are identified by: • Option 1: a single mode: a range of AIDs • Option 2: 2 modes: a mode with a range of AIDs and a mode with group. ID • Results – Option #1: 21 – Option #2: 12 Submission Slide 15 Laurent cariou, Intel

March, 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll #2 (1117 -0074 -02 -00 ax-explanations-for-cr-on-27 -5 -2 -7. pptx-) • Do you agree to define a new NDP feedback report trigger frame variant • Results: Y/N/A: 28/1/16 Submission Slide 16 Laurent cariou, Intel

March, 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll #3 (1117 -0074 -02 -00 ax-explanations-for-cr-on-27 -5 -2 -7. pptx-) • Do you agree to define that the STAs scheduled by a NDP feedback report trigger frame variant with a feedback type set to “resource request” are identified by – Option 1: one range of AIDs – Option 2: one or multiple ranges of AIDs Note: A range of AIDs is defined to be between AID start and AID start + NAIDs - 1. The trigger frame includes the AID start parameter and the needed parameters to calculate NAIDs • Option 1: 14 Y / 2 N / 17 A • Option 2: 13 Y/ 5 N/ 14 A Submission Slide 17 Laurent cariou, Intel

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-1 (11 -17 -0239 -02 -00 ax-lb 225 -mac-cr-ht-control-subclause-9 -2 -4 -6 -x-and-10 -1 -block-2. docx) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0239 r 2 for CIDs: • 5054, 5055, 5056, 5126, 5442, 7303, 7305, 7719, 7865, 7867, 8133, 8179, 8180, 8181, 8249, 9620, 9621, 9806 (19 CIDs) Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 18 Alfred Asterjadhi (Qualcomm)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-2 (1117 -0240 -01 -00 ax-lb 225 -mac-cr-ht-control-subclause-9 -2 -4 -6 -x-and-10 -1 -block-3. docx-) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0240 r 2 for CIDs: • 3156, 3384, 3491, 3822, 3907, 4371, 4439, 4740, 5445, 7020, 7473, 8185, 8375, 9809, 9810, 9811, 9812 (17 CIDs) • 6965 (1 CIDs) Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 19 Alfred Asterjadhi (Qualcomm)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-3 (11 -17 -0346 -00 -00 ax-lb 225 -cr-on-txop-truncation-10 -22 -2 -9. docx) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0346 r 0 for CIDs: • 6537, 9282 Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 20 Jeongki Kim (LGE)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-4 (11 -17 -0344 -0100 ax-lb 225 -cr-on-eifs-and-txop-duration-10 -3 -2 -3 -7 -and-27 -11 -5. docx-) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0344 r 1 for CIDs: • 3089, 6057, 7527, 9599, 9385 (5 CIDs) Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 21 Jeongki Kim (LGE)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-5 (11 -17 -0347 -0100 ax-lb 225 -cr-on-intra-ppdu-ps-27 -14 -1. docx-) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0347 r 1 for CIDs: • 3091, 5216, 5506, 5938, 6052, 6055, 6782, 6783, 6784, 6785, 7602, 8241, 8242, 9602 (14 CIDs) Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 22 Jeongki Kim (LGE)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-6 (11 -17 -0384 -0200 ax-lb 225 -comment-resolution-for-10 -24 -10. docx-) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0384 r 2 for CIDs: • 3051, 3052, 3053, 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211, 3212, 7786, 7787, 9695, 9864 (13 CIDs) Results: Straw poll passed with no objection Submission Slide 23 Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR-7 (11 -17 -0283 -05 -00 ax-lb 225 -mac-cr-9 -3 -1 -23. docx) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0283 r 5 for CIDs: • 3018, 8190 (2 CIDs) Results: Strawpoll passed with no objection Submission Slide 24 Raja Banerjea (Qualcomm)

March 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Back Up Submission Slide 25 Eric Wong (Apple)

January 2017 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -17/0453 r 3 Straw-poll MAC-CR- (11 -17 -0448 -00 -00 ax-proposed-resolution-for-comments-related-to-cids-in-27 -5 -2. docx) Do you agree to add to the 11 ax specification D 1. 1 the comment resolutions in document 17/0448 r 0 for CIDs: • 5397, 5712, 7394, 8058, 8275, 8303 (6 CIDs) Results: Submission Slide 26 Jing Ma (NICT)