March 2016 doc IEEE 802 11 160519 r

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 IEEE 802. 11 LRLP TIG May 2016 Agenda and Opening Report Date: 2016 -05 -15 Authors: Submission Slide 1 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 IEEE 802. 11 LRLP TIG Agenda Monday PM 1 Call for a secretary Approve Agenda Review policy and procedures for non-PAR meeting Approval of March Minutes (11 -16 -0482 r 0) Review of submitted contributions, order of presentation Discussion : Develop clarity and consensus on 1) Key differentiators of LRLP 2) Expected scope for SG 3) Technical approaches Tuesday PM 1 Presentations of contributions Develop plan to revise output report Wednesday AM 1 Discussion : LRLP timeframe with respect to 802. 11 ax Thursday PM 1 Review of output report, agree on further editing Plan final section of output report to capture recommendation to Study Group Review schedule, teleconferences, objectives for next meeting Adjourn Submission Slide 2 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings l All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. l Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. l Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. l Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. l l Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. l Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. l Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. -------------------------------- If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/about/sasb/patcom/index. html See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at https: //development. standards. ieee. org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/preparslides. ppt Submission Slide 3 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 MONDAY Submission Slide 4 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Discussion of key differentiators • LRLP provides an integrated infrastructure connectivity. I. E. the Io. T product with LRLP does not have to provide both ends of the link to the Cloud Compared to Zig. Bee, Z-Wave, BLE, and other non-802. 11 technologies • LRLP enables an asymmetrical STA/AP relationship. • The STA can be simpler, with different RF – could be narrow channel only, without ability to support existing/legacy modes. • Doesn’t have to be – a full function STA can still support LRLP • LRLP defines a single PHY and modulation that can be parameterized to optimize for lowest power or longer range Preliminary list for example – not meant to be complete Submission Slide 5 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Scope Changes Straw Poll Should the LRLP output document focus on low power aspects over the longer range aspects? Yes No Abstain Submission 25 5 16 Slide 6 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 TUESDAY Submission Slide 7 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Contributions for May 678 r 0 LRLP TIG Wearable Device Use Cases and Requirements for LRLP Yunsong Yang (Huawei Technologies) 683 r 0 LRLP TIG Considerations on Long Range Ke Yao (ZTE Corporation) Submission Slide 8 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Straw Poll 1) LRLP should proceed to define lower power operation according to the use cases defined in the output document. 8 2) WUR is sufficient for 802. 11 low power, and additional mechanisms being considered with LRLP are not required. 20 Submission Slide 9 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Straw Poll Should the membership pursue development of low power operation beyond WUR at this time? Yes 1 No 42 Abstain Submission 32 Slide 10 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

March 2016 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -16/0519 r 3 Discussion on next steps Based on the lack of support for proceeding with the development of LRLP, the TIG is adjourned Submission Slide 11 Tim Godfrey, EPRI