March 2012 doc IEEE 802 11 111184 r

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 802. 11 TGac Editor’s Report Authors: Submission Date: 2012 -07 -16 Slide 1 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Abstract • This document summarises editorial activities on the TGac Draft since the last meeting • Status of the draft • Status of the comments • This document is cumulative, newer data at the front – i. e. , it will be revised per meeting to show updated status. Submission Slide 2 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 July 2012 (San Diego) Submission Slide 3 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Draft status • At the May session, the WG approved a 20 day LB: – “Should P 802. 11 ac D 3. 0 be forwarded to sponsor ballot? ” • LB 188 closed 25 June 2012 • 273 votes: – 233 yes (90. 7%) – 24 no (+2 without comments) – 14 abstain • Motion passes • We received 855 comments Submission Slide 4 LB 187: 271 votes: - 223 yes (88. 8%) - 28 no - 19 abstain Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Comment break down • 855 comments: – 261 editorial – 18 general – 576 technical • The general and technical have been assigned to adhocs Submission Slide 5 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Status following July 11 -13 ad-hoc Duplicate of CID Draft All CID All state 1 state Unresolved Other Grand Total Unassigned Ad-hoc Notes Total Resolved Approved Duplicate Total Owning Ad-hoc Comment Group Count Count Count 1486 6 1492 12 COEX (Blank) 12 12 4 COEX-2012 -07 -12 4 4 Total 12 12 4 4 16 1 EDITOR (Blank) 1 1 256 4 Editorial 260 Total 256 5 261 4 GEN (Blank) 4 4 15 GEN-2012 -07 -12 15 15 Total 4 4 15 15 19 37 203 MAC (Blank) 240 33 MAC-2012 -07 -11 33 33 27 MAC-2012 -07 -12 27 27 Total 37 203 240 60 60 300 83 6 MU (Blank) 89 89 14 MU-2012 -07 -12 14 14 Total 83 6 89 14 14 103 126 10 PHY (Blank) 136 8 20120711_f 2 f_SP_passed 8 8 12 20120712_f 2 f_SP_passed 12 12 Total 126 10 136 20 20 156 293 433 16 742 113 855 Total LB 187 188 Grand Total 293 433 16 742 113 1486 6 1605 2347 See 12/752 r 5 (LB 188 comments TGac D 3. 0) Submission Slide 6 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Comment assignment (unresolved comments) Duplicate of CID (Blank) Assignee Adrian Stephens Allan Zhu, Liwen Chu Bo Sun Brain Hart, Kaz Brian Hart Chao. Chun Dan Harkins, Brian Hart Eldad Perahia Eric Wong James Wang Kaiying Liwen Chu Mark Rison Matt Fischer Minho Nihar Osama Reza Robert Stacey Sandhya Sandyha Simone Merlin Vinko Erceg Vish Yong Liu Yongho Seok Youhan Kim Yusuke Asai Grand Total Submission Resn Status (Blank) Owning Ad-hoc COEX Count of CID Motion Number (Blank) GEN Count of CID MAC Count of CID 1 MU Count of CID PHY Count of CID 4 32 1 18 7 1 2 35 8 6 9 6 1 1 1 2 7 1 18 9 1 6 2 12 4 Slide 7 1 17 5 8 2 1 37 203 89 Grand Total Count of CID 4 4 5 32 12 12 1 2 21 7 2 20 20 35 8 6 1 10 7 2 28 28 18 7 12 20 18 9 1 16 32 32 23 38 37 6 6 13 13 136 444 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 May 2012 (Atlanta) No report Submission Slide 8 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 March 2012 (Hawaii) Submission Slide 9 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Draft status • At the January session, the WG approved a 30 day LB: – “Should P 802. 11 ac D 2. 0 be forwarded to sponsor ballot? ” • LB 187 closed 18 February 2012 • 271 votes: – 223 yes (88. 8%) – 28 no – 19 abstain • Motion passes • We received 1492 comments Submission Slide 10 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Initial comment break down • 1492 comments: – 655 editorial – 59 general – 778 technical • The general and technical have been assigned to adhocs • Some editorial comments have since been reclassified technical and assigned to ad-hocs Submission Slide 11 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Status following March 7 -9 ad-hoc Duplicate of CID All LB 187 Draft All Owning Ad-hoc COEX EDITOR GEN MAC MU PHY Total Grand Total CID All Comment Group (Blank) COEX_2012_03_09_adhoc COEX_2012_03_10_adhoc Total (Blank) Editorial Total (Blank) PICS Total (Blank) MAC_2012_03_08_adhoc MAC_2012_03_09_adhoc MIB Total (Blank) MU 20120308+09 Total (Blank) 40+40 PHY_20120308_adhoc_SP_passed PHY_20120309_adhoc_SP_passed Total state 1 Unresolved Unassigned Count state Assigned Count Ad-hoc Notes Count 24 Other Total Resolved Count 2 26 Grand Total Duplicate Count Total Count 4 3 24 2 26 20 398 1 22 23 292 398 1 22 23 8 264 1 12 9 276 20 48 1 173 4 10 9 13 305 49 49 192 4 7 2 240 1 4 242 5 Count 4 3 7 3 244 247 90 55 145 5 5 9 416 177 548 10 33 196 997 91 490 5 72 19 91 495 416 548 33 997 490 5 495 72 19 Corresponds to 12/223 r 7 (LB 187 comment TGac D 2. 0) Submission Slide 12 Robert Stacey, Apple 26 4 3 33 3 642 645 1 22 23 292 90 55 13 450 49 5 54 192 4 72 19 287 1492

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 January 2012 (Jacksonville) Submission Slide 13 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Draft status • At November session, the TG instructed the editor to produce a D 2. 0 for ballot based on resolved comments and a few motions (y/n/a=59/1/4=98. 3%) • However, the WG motion to take the draft to ballot failed (y/n/a=33/12/9=73. 3%) • As a result, D 1. 4 (instead of D 2. 0) was released following the November session • D 1. 4 is effectively the draft motioned by the TG for D 2. 0 at the November session Submission Slide 14 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Expectation for D 2. 0 • D 2. 0 = D 1. 4 plus the following – Incorporate revised resolution for CID 3398 in 11/1566 r 1 (Antenna Indication in VHT Capabilities Info) • Editor missed this when preparing D 1. 4 – Any additional changes approved this session Submission Slide 15 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 November 2011 (Atlanta) Submission Slide 16 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Database status LB All state Owning Ad-hoc Unassigned Assigned Resolved Approved Editorial Unresolved Duplicate Editorial Approved Editorial Resolved Grand Total Count Count Count COEX 4 EDITOR 1 MAC 2 59 260 564 4 1 MU 3 PHY 18 1 84 265 Grand Total Submission 3 9 5 2 565 2 Slide 17 147 12 627 1613 61 127 20 23 27 46 260 12 627 Robert Stacey, Apple 1818

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Comment status • Comments resolved since the September session: 260 • Unresolved comments: – – – GEN: COEX: MU: PHY: MAC: 0 4 3 18 59 • See “ 11/1430 r 2 LB 178 D 1. 0 comments for motion” Submission Slide 18 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Process for motioning resolutions • Change from what we did last time • A single document, “ 11/1430 LB 178 D 1. 0 comments for motion”, will contain resolutions ready for motion • 11/1430 r 2 reflects resolutions through end of ad-hoc last week • Tabs in the spreadsheet list comments awaiting motion • Tabs labeled with ad-hoc name (GEN, MU, COEX, MAC, PHY) and the date the resolution was strawpolled Submission Slide 19 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Draft status • D 1. 2 was released 7 October 2011 – Reflects resolutions that passed motion during the September 2011 session • D 1. 3 is available in the member’s area – Reflects resolutions that passed strawpoll during the telecons since September and a few resolutions from November ad-hoc at Cisco – See spreadsheet in 11/1430 r 2: • Look for non-blank “Edit status” – I = implemented, N = not implemented • Also, look at “Edited in draft” column – Indicates draft revision where change was made Submission Slide 20 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Sept 2011 (Okinawa) Submission Slide 21 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Current Database Status LB All state Owning Ad-hoc Unassigned Assigned Resolved Approved Editorial Unresolved Duplicate Editorial Approved Editorial Resolved Grand Total Count Count Count COEX 39 20 11 1 2 18 GEN 28 20 4 2 54 MAC 7 156 107 76 346 68 23 21 112 2 166 70 29 267 38 432 233 EDITOR MU PHY Grand Total Submission 8 236 39 Slide 22 116 252 1 1 587 Robert Stacey, Apple 1000 1818

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Resolved Comments • At the ad-hoc in Seoul we resolved: – 4 GEN comments • see 11/1236, GEN-2011 -09 -15 -AD-HOC tab – 76 MAC comments • see 11/1132, MAC-09 -14 -ADHOC and MAC-09 -15 -ADHOC tabs – 23 MU comments • See 11/1245, MU-Seoul-20110915 -20110916 tab – 10 COEX comments • See 11/yyyy, Coex for Motion 201109 tab – 40 PHY comments • See 11/yyyy, PHY_09_14_11 and PHY_09_15_11 tabs • These will be motioned this week Submission Slide 23 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved: GEN • 28 Security (GCMP) • 18 PICS • 2 Misc Submission Slide 24 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved MAC (assignees) • • • Matt: 21 Hongyuan: 28 Illsoo: 16 Peter Loc: 13 Osama: 12 Jae Seung: 14 Chao-Chun: 10 Reza: 6 Liwen: 6 Mark Rison: 3 Simone: 4 Robert: 4 Submission • • Slide 25 Tianyu: 2 Minho: 2 David Yang: 1 Kaiying: 1 Yongho: 1 Yong Liu: 1 Unassigned: 7 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved PHY (assignees) • • • Minho: 65 Sean: 30 Vinko: 24 Roy: 19 Youhan: 3 Brian: 8 Submission • • • Slide 26 Mark Rison: 6 Raja: 5 Reza: 5 Yongho: 5 Illsoo: 3 Peter Loc: 2 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved MU (assignees) • • Yong Liu: 18 Illsoo: 14 Brian: 11 Joonsuk: 7 David Yang: 5 Wei Shi: 3 Robert: 2 Osama: 1 Submission Slide 27 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved COEX (assignees) • • Yongho: 8 Peter Loc: 5 Jae Seung: 5 Brian: 2 Submission Slide 28 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Sept 2011 Ad-hoc (Seoul) Submission Slide 29 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Current Database Status LB All state Owning Ad-hoc Unassigned Assigned Resolved Approved Editorial Unresolved Duplicate Editorial Approved Editorial Resolved Grand Total Count Count Count COEX 31 1 1 2 17 GEN 28 24 MAC 7 233 EDITOR MU 236 39 31 91 PHY Grand Total Submission 2 225 11 38 606 60 40 8 236 39 Slide 30 116 1 587 999 2 54 76 347 21 112 28 266 251 1 587 Robert Stacey, Apple 1818

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Resolved Comments • At the July meeting we adopted resolutions to 237 comments • The editor has resolved a further 587 editorial comments • The motioned and resolved editorial comments are captured in D 1. 1 • On the subsequent teleconferences, we have resolved a further – 31 MAC, 11 PHY, 1 COEX Submission Slide 31 Robert Stacey, Apple

March 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/1184 r 5 Unresolved Comments • EDITOR – 42 comments • GEN – 28 comments on GCMP restriction (unassigned, TG discussion) – 17 comments on PICS assigned to Osama – 7 others assigned • MAC – 240 comments (7 unassigned) • PHY – 227 comments (2 unassigned) • MU – 91 comments • COEX – 31 comments Submission Slide 32 Robert Stacey, Apple