March 2006 doc IEEE 802 19 060018 r

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Exploration of Structure for IEEE P 1900. 2 Recommended Practice for Interference and Coexistence Analysis Date: 16 Mar 06 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802. 19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802. 19. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http: // ieee 802. org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws. pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. " Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <shellhammer@ieee. org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802. 19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee. org>. Submission 1 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Abstract • Exploration of Structure for IEEE P 1900. 2 Recommended Practice for Interference and Coexistence Analysis Submission 2 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Exploration of Structure for IEEE P 1900. 2 Recommended Practice for Interference and Coexistence Analysis Stephen Berger TEM Consulting (512) 864 -3365 stephen. berger@ieee. org Submission 3 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Overview doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Context Purpose Usage Model Context/Comparison Variables Contrasting & Relevant Variables Frequency & System Relationships Reduce matrix of possible interference to a sparse matrix of controlling & bounding cases for analysis Analyze Effects with Probability Submission 4 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Overview doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Benefits of Proposal Full matrix of scenarios and conditions Reduced sparse matrix for analysis Summation Submission 5 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Context Purpose Why is this analysis being done? What are the questions? Usage Model What usage model(s) are assumed? Context & Comparison What interference exists now? What are the points of difference between the existing state and that being analyzed? Submission 6 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables Contrasting Variables What variables are different between the current situation and the proposed innovation? Relevant Variables What variables are important to the analysis, even if they are the same? Submission 7 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables Frequency Relationships In Channel Adjacent Channel (near and distant) Band Edge Out of Band (near and far) Systems What system relationships must be analyzed? Submission 8 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Context for Comparison doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Usage Model Packet Data Real Time Service Significance of Effects Context Thermal Noise Natural Environmental Noise Device Internal Noise System Internal Noise Comparison Interference being analyzed Submission 9 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Operating Impact Who owns the margin? Effects C/I Bit loss Packet Loss Data Loss Link Loss E 3 vs System impact doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables Probability What is the probability of each level of effect? Submission 10 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 A Proposed Spectrum Scorecard Level 3: Attributes Submission 11 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables for Consideration RF Parameters Frequency range Frequency selection Emission Bandwidth Unintentional Emissions Modulation Efficiency TDMA Link Power Budget Power Control Submission 12 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables for Consideration RF Parameters Interference Mitigation or Tolerance Multi-Path Tolerance Directionality of Signal Demodulated waveform characteristics Peak-to. Average TX vs RX relationship to the variables Submission 13 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables for Consideration Geographic Awareness Location Information Sharing System Management Ill. management based on angle to satellite Movement vs speed of adaption Submission 14 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables for Consideration Environmental Awareness Spectrum Sensing Frequency Range Dynamic Range Signal Identification Capability Collision Detection & Management Coordinated or Orthogonal Operation Submission 15 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Variables for Consideration Network Management Transport Control Network Routing Directional Routing Access Priority Quality of Service System Integration Operational Protocols to manage interference Submission 16 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

Frequency Relationships doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 March 2006 Types of Interference In Band Cochannel Submission Out of Band Edge Adjacent Channel 17 Far Out of Band Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Interference Effects doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Packet Frame Device System Analysis of impact at each level with probability of occurrence is necessary. Submission 18 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting

March 2006 Summation doc. : IEEE 802. 19 -06/0018 r 0 Staged presentation of analysis Analysis of variables / attributes Summation of groups of variables Summation by category & use model Conclusions Submission 19 Steve Berger, TEM Consulting