March 2004 doc IEEE 802 0 04XXXr 0
- Slides: 4
March, 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 0 -04/XXXr 0 Openness Issues for EC Reflector Author: Matthew Sherman Vice Chair, IEEE 802 BAE Systems - CINR Matthew. Sherman@BAESystems. com 1 st Date: March 14 th, 2005 Submission 1 Matthew Sherman, BAE Systems
March, 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 0 -04/XXXr 0 Why this topic • In P&P revisions contemplated openness of EC reflector has been raised as issue – Telecons – Lengths of electronic ballots – Outside comments on P&P revisions, etc • A number of suggestions have been made to improve openness Submission 2 Matthew Sherman, BAE Systems
March, 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 0 -04/XXXr 0 Mechanisms for Improved Openness • Leave things as is – Archive access to reflector traffic • Open current EC reflector to observers – Is this even possible? • Separate reflector for rules changes and other issues • Separate observer reflector with forwarding from current reflector • Posting on website Submission 3 Matthew Sherman, BAE Systems
March, 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 0 -04/XXXr 0 Straw Poll: Should we persue? • Leave things as is ______ – Archive access to reflector traffic • Open current EC reflector to observers ______ – Is this even possible? • Separate reflector for rules changes etc. ______ • Separate observer reflector (forwarding) ______ • Posting on website Submission ______ 4 Matthew Sherman, BAE Systems
