Mar 2010 doc IEEE 802 11 100282 r

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802. 11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports Authors: Report Date: 2010 -03 -19 Slide 1 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract • This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802. 11 sub-groups for presentation at the March 2010 closing plenary meeting. Report Slide 2 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802. 11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar ‘ 10) Authors: Report Date: 2010 -03 -16 Slide 3 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Volunteer Editor Contacts • • Report TGp – Wayne Fisher – wfisher@arinc. com TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda - Kazuyuki. A. Sakoda@jp. sony. com TGu – Necati Canpolat – necati. canpolat@intel. com TGv – Emily Qi – emily. h. qi@intel. com TGz – Menzo Wentink– mwentink@qualcomm. com TGmb – Adrian Stephens – adrian. p. stephens@intel. com (TBC) TGaa – Hang Liu – hang. liu@thomson. net Editor Emeritus: – TGk – Joe Kwak– joekwak@sbcglobal. net – TGn – Adrian Stephens – adrian. p. stephens@intel. com – TGr – Bill Marshall – wtm@research. att. com – TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – ncamwing@cisco. com – TGy – Peter Ecclesine – pecclesi@cisco. com Slide 4 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Two Technical Editors • Peter Ecclesine runs the face to face meetings • Adrian Stephens runs the publication process • Matthew Gast is the ANA administrator Report Slide 5 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Amendment Editor Amendment Ordering numbering is • Data as of Mar 2010 • See http: //grouper. ieee. org/groups/802/11/Reports/802. 11_Timelines. htm editorial! No need Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Dateto make 802. 11 Amendment 6 TGp June 2010 ballot 802. 11 Amendment 7 TGz Sept 2010 comments on 802. 11 Amendment 8 TGv Sept 2010 these 802. 11 Amendment 9 TGu Sept 2010 dynamic 802. 11 Amendment 10 TGs Jan 2011 numbers! 802. 11 Revision 802. 11 mb June 2011 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 1 TGaa Oct 2011 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 2 TGac Dec 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 3 TGad Dec 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 4 TGae Jun 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 5 TGaf Dec 2012 Report Slide 6 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802. 11 Style Guide • See 11 -09 -1034 -00 -0000 -wg 11 -style-guide. doc • These style practices are to be followed when submitting drafts for Working Group consideration Report Slide 7 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Pre-Rev. Com IEEE-SA Review • Possibly near the end of Sponsor Ballot (3 rd recirc or 4 th recirc) , we would offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after Rev. Com. • A downside is the possibility that many pages are touched by the changes (like renaming), and voters reopen text that has been stable for new comments. • It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review. • Another choice is after initial Sponsor Ballot. We will ask if it is valid to make editorial changes between EC approval and initial sponsor ballot. Report Slide 8 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7/7 of 11 -10/0321 r 3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -19 Authors: Report Slide 9 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/3 of 11 -10/0418 r 0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract Closing report for WNG SC for March 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA Report Slide 10 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/3 of 11 -10/0418 r 0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Mar 2010 • • • doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Five presentations at this meeting – Heterogeneous Wireless LAN Mesh Interworking (11 -10 -0296 -01 -0 wngheterogeneous-wireless-mesh-network-interworking. pptx) - Taejin Lee – Towards Carrier-Grade 802. 11 at Disney Theme Parks (11 -10 -0287 -03 -0 wngtowards-carrier-grade-802 -11 -at-disney-theme-parks. pptx) – Stefan Mangold – Comments on Sub 1 GHz license-exempt operation (11 -10 -0204 -01 -0 wngcommentsonsub 1 ghz. ppt) – Dave Halasz – Fast Initial Authentication (11 -10 -0361 -00 -0000 -fast-initial-authentication. ppt) - Hiroki Nakano – Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Management (11 -10 -0368 -00 -0 wngheterogeneous-wireless-networks-management. ppt) - 802. 21 Network Management Study Group Minutes – 11 -10 -364 r 0 Plans for May 2010 – 2 2 hour sessions Report Slide 11 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/3 of 11 -10/0418 r 0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 IEEE 802. 11 ARC SC – March 2010 • Topics for March 802 Plenary – 802. 1 architecture document revision effort • Impacts to. 11 • Interface approach • Interested. 11 Members • . 11 ARC Chair attended 802 OA session as. 1 liaison • . 11 ARC did not meet this week – Chair was off-line with food poisoning • Stay away from the hotel café meatloaf special…. Report Slide 12 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802 OA project status • Revision of 802 OA is a currently authorized project – Par approved 27/feb/2007 – Expires end of 2011 • PAR was created for revision (instead of reaffirmation). • 802 Chair recently reorganized project – New project chair, 1 designated member from each “dot” group. • Status: – There is a d 0 draft, it had a internal TG review in. 1; – Review closed 2/2009, comments not processed. • 802 OA base doc is vintage 2001 for content – 2001 was rev of original 1990 doc – There are 2 amendments to 2001 doc • A (2003) for ethertypes & B (2004) Registration of object ids. Report Slide 13 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802 OA March 2010 Discussion Notes • Goals for project: – Update to reflect current usage – Insure it is relevant to all 802 groups. • Missing topics: – wireless, –. 17, – should probably take out token ring and maybe FDDI. • Issue: we have stds that don’t have macs & phys (ex: 21 & 23) – how to fit them into this Framework? How does. 19 fit? • AI for. 11 (and other groups) review 802 OA, see how “dot” standard fits (or doesn’t) with layer pics in 802 OA, start discussion / proposal for 802 OA changes. Report Slide 14 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 March 2010 TGmb Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 15 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract Closing report for TGmb for March 2010 interim meeting in Orlando, Florida, USA. Report Slide 16 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGmb Status All aboard, full steam ahead on t Photo credit: Tasa_M on Flickr; used with permission (Creative Commons license) http: //www. flickr. com/photos/tasa_m/3274018735/ Report Slide 17 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Accomplishments • No interpretation requests received • Completed comment processing from LB 160; recirculation ballot will be requested later – One teleconference to resolve comments: May 7 • Major technical presentations – Clause 11. 3 comment resolution – Extensive debate on key caching clarifications – Regulatory framework • No change to plan of record Report Slide 18 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Current TGmb Plan of Record ü May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input ü July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals ü ü ü Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – Nes. Com/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot – (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009) ü Nov 2009 – Recirc start • May 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days) • July 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start – (Include all published amendments as of July 2010) • November 2010 – Sponsor Recirc • March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval • June 2011 – Rev. Com/SASB Approval Report Slide 19 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 References • Agenda: 11 -10/0290 r 5 • Minutes: 11 -10/0348 r 0 Report Slide 20 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/6 of 11 -10/0346 r 0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGp Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -17 Author: Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 21 from slide 1/4 of 11 -10/0386 r 0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc. /US Do. T

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract TGp (acting as P 802. 11 p CRC) closing report for March meetings Report Slide 22 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/4 of 11 -10/0386 r 0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc. /US Do. T)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 March Meetings Summary • Sponsor Ballot #1 closed on 16 February, 96 % affirmative • 3 time slots during the week • Completed resolution of all comments (21) prior to and during the week, resolution document is 11 -10 -0239 -02 -000 p sb 1 tgp comment resolutions master • All SB#1 commenters have indicated that they are satisfied with these resolutions • Voted to go to recirculation ballot as soon as possible • Voted to request EC for conditional approval to forward to June Rev. Com meeting Report Slide 23 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/4 of 11 -10/0386 r 0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc. /US Do. T)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Status • D 11. 0 will be going to recirculation ballot • All disapprove voters have been satisfied with one exception that did not vote on last ballot • Weekly teleconferences planned for every Thursday @ 1500 Piscataway time (resuming after recirculation ballot is complete) • Plan is to complete sponsor balloting and present to June Rev. Com meeting Report Slide 24 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/4 of 11 -10/0386 r 0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc. /US Do. T)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGs Orlando Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -19 Author: Name Address Affiliation Phone Email Dee Denteneer HTC 37; 5656 AE Eindhoven; The Netherlands Philips +31 40 2749743 Dee. Denteneer@phil ips. com Report Slide 25 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract TGs closing report for the March 2010 meeting. Resolved outstanding comments and ready to go to recirculation. Report Slide 26 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Status • TGs passed LB 159 with 85% approval rate (January 2010) • Before the meeting: • Comment resolution spreadsheet 11 -10/0032 r 5 with 349 comments open • Most recent TGs Draft is D 4. 01 • After meeting • Most recent TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11 -10/0032 r 11, with resolutions to all comments • An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting in 1110/0241 r 6 • The TGs draft minutes will be uploaded as 11 Report Slide 27 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation 10/0381 r 1 from slide 3/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Next Steps • Produce Draft 5. 0 and go to recirculation • TGs is holding teleconferences on Thursdays April 1 and May 6, 13 and Wednesday April 28 at 11: 00 ET for a maximum duration of 90 minutes • TGs has planned an ad hoc meeting in Tokyo May 1315 just before the May meeting in Beijing. • Goal for the May 2010 TGs meeting in Beijing, China: – Start resolving comments received in recirculation, aiming for a rapid recirculation Report Slide 28 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 • Motion: – Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#159 on P 802. 11 s Draft 4. 0 as contained in document 11 -10/32 r 12, – Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5. 0 incorporating these resolutions and, – Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P 802. 11 s Draft 5. 0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot? ” • Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs • TGs vote: – Moved: Dave Halasz: Seconded: Michael Bahr Result: 10 -0 -0 Report Slide 29 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 • Motion, moved to schedule TGs teleconferences on Thursdays April 1 and May 6, 13 and Wednesday April 28 at 11: 00 ET for a maximum duration of 90 minutes. Mover: Kazuyuki Sakoda Seconder: Guido Hiertz Approved by unanimous consent • Motion, moved to hold a TGs ad hoc on May 13 -15 in Tokyo. Mover: Guido Hiertz Seconder: Kazuyuki Sakoda Approved by unanimous consent Report Slide 30 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/6 of 11 -10/0421 r 0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 31 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/3 of 11 -10/0408 r 0 by Stephen Mc. Cann, RIM

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for March 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA Report Slide 32 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/3 of 11 -10/0408 r 0 by Stephen Mc. Cann, RIM

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 • Initial Sponsor Ballot (#0) progress – Resolved all comments this week. • 11 -09 -1120 -20 -000 u-d 8 -0 -comments-spreadsheet. xls – 1 st re-circulation sponsor ballot late March 2010 • Teleconferences – Wednesdays at 11 ET – 31 st March, 6 th April, 28 th April, 5 th May, 12 th May • Plans for May 2010 – Resolve 1 st re-circ sponsor ballot comments Report Slide 33 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/3 of 11 -10/0408 r 0 by Stephen Mc. Cann, RIM

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 March 2010 Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 34 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This document contains the TGv closing report for March 2010. Report Slide 35 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Goals and Accomplishments • Comment resolution from Initial Sponsor Ballot – 1045 comments, 1045 resolutions completed, 0 remain • Teleconferences • Thursdays April 8, 15, 29, May 6, 13, Tuesday April 20 • 2 pm Eastern (11 am Pacific) • 2 hours Report Slide 36 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Output Documents • 11 -10 -0416 -00 -000 v-TGv-March-2010 -closing-report. ppt • 11 -10 -0267 -06 -000 v-tgv-March-2010 -agenda. ppt • 11 -10 -0417 -00 -000 v-TGv-Meeting-Minutes-March 2010. doc Report Slide 37 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed – Jan 08 – D 2. 0, May 08 – D 3. 0, Nov 08 – D 4. 0 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D 4. 0) – Mar 09 – D 5. 0, May 09 – D 6. 0, July 09 – D 7. 0, D 7. 0(unchanged) • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09 – D 7. 0 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09 – Jan 09 – D 8. 0, March D 9. 0, April D 10. 0 (deleted Feb D 9. 0) – May 12 th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval • Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • Rev. Com/Standards Board Approval: June 4 th/June 5 th(or so) • Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010 Report Slide 38 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGv Timeline – Updated March, 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed – Jan 08 – D 2. 0, May 08 – D 3. 0, Nov 08 – D 4. 0 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D 4. 0) – Mar 09 – D 5. 0, May 09 – D 6. 0, July 09 – D 7. 0, D 7. 0(unchanged) • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09 – D 7. 0 Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09 – Jan 09 – D 8. 0, D 9. 0, March D 10. 0, April/May D 11. 0, May/June D 11. 0 (unchanged) – 20 August Revcom for Sept approval (was May/ June) • Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • Rev. Com/Standards Board Approval: September 2010 (was June 2010) • Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010 Report Slide 39 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Goals for Mar 10 - May 2010 • Second Recirculation Sponsor Ballot • Resolve comments from Second Recirculation Sponsor Ballot • Third Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Report Slide 40 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 References Report Slide 41 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 8/8 of 11 -10/0416 r 0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGz Orlando Closing Report Date: 18 March 2010 Authors: Report Slide 42 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/2 of 11 -10/0400 r 0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGz Accomplishments in Orlando • TGz resolved all of the comments received on the first recirculation sponsor ballot – The approved comment resolutions are in 11 -10/298 r 2 • TGz approved a 15 -day recirculation sponsor ballot to start when the editor has prepared TGz draft 8. 0 • TGz approved the following teleconferences: – April 8, 15, 22, 29, May 6, 13 – Start time 2 pm ET, for 2 hours Report Slide 43 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 802. 11 aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Orlando, Florida Closing Report – Draft Version Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 44 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/5 of 11 -10/0395 r 0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel; Alex Ashley, NDS

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Snapshot Goals for the Orlando Meeting: • • • Report Review alternate proposals on interworking with 802. 1 Qat proposal and adopt the best fit Discuss and resolve review comments on Draft 0. 04 Listen to technical proposals on TGaa topics Joint meeting with 802. 1 AVB – review 802. 1 Qat and settle on a proposal for“interworking with 802, 1 Qat” Empower the editor to generate D 0. 99 for internal review WG letter ballot at the end of May meeting Slide 45 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Technical Presentations Document number Title Solution Choices for Interworking with 802. 1 Qat Author(s) 1 10/219 r 3 2 09/1183 r 1 3 10/319 r 1, 320 r 0 4 10/304 r 0 5 10/398 r 0 6 10/326 r 0 OBSS Race Condition Solution 7 10/411 r 0, 412 r 0 Enhancement to DEI for Intra-stream Yacine Ghamri Doudane prioritization Report Resolution to Draft 0. 02 Internal Review Comment #3 Improving MRG with DMS Empirical Formulas for EDCA overhead factor Designated MSRP Node handling on 802. 11 Network Slide 46 Ganesh Venkatesan Brian Hart Graham Smith Philippe Klein Alex Ashley Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 What did we accomplish this week? • • • Discussed, resolved and approved corresponding contributions related to comments on Draft 0. 02, D 0. 03 Listened to technical proposals on TGaa topics Jointly met with 802. 1 AVB • • • Report Reviewed alternate solutions on interworking with 802. 1 Qat proposal. Selected an approach for 802. 11 interworking with 802. 1 Qat MSR protocol Empowered the editor to generate D 0. 05 incorporating approved internal review comment resolutions/new contributions. Slide 47 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Plans • • Teleconferences (Mar 29, Apr 12, Apr 26, May 10 – 1100 -1230 Hrs EDT) • Complete internal review of Draft 0. 04, resolve corresponding comments • Listen to technical proposals on TGaa topics • Complete Draft 0. 05 review and generate comment spreadsheet May 2010 Meeting • • Report Complete Draft 0. 05 comment resolution Approve Draft 1. 0 and kickoff WG letter Ballot Slide 48 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGac March 2010 Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 49 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGac for the March 2010 session. Report Slide 50 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Work Completed • Continued with the Ad Hoc group meetings. Ad Hoc group reports are available at: – – • MAC Ad Hoc report 11 -10 -0199 r 2 PHY Ad Hoc report 11 -10 -0211 r 7 MU-MIMO Ad Hoc report 11 -10 -0328 r 2 Coexistence Ad Hoc report 11 -10 -0340 r 5 Motions passed to update the TG Specification Framework in areas related to: – Preamble structure with two VHT SIG fields and TBD auto detect form (R 3. 2. 1. F and R 3. 2. 1. G) – PHY Numerology excluding the maximum number of users for MU (R 3. 2. 2. A) – Interference cancellation and Resolvable LTFs (R 4. 1) – Same modulation the same coding rate and coding type for all streams in SU transmission (R 3. 4. D) – VHT SIG A to include STBC and BW bit(s) (R 3. 2. 1. H) • • Report Accepted a new revision of the TGac Channel Models Addendum document Accepted a new revision of the TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology. Slide 51 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TG Approved Documents • 11 -09 -059 r 5 is the approved TGac Selection Procedure document. • 11 -09 -0161 r 2 is the approved TGac Usage Model document. • 11 -09 -308 r 12 is the approved TGac Channel Models Addendum document. • 11 -09 -0451 r 12 is the approved TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document • 09 -0992 r 9 is the approved TGac Specification Framework document. Report Slide 52 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 May 2010 Goals • Continue the work on the Specification Framework document and its related functional blocks. Report Slide 53 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Conference Call Times • PHY telecon schedule – April 8, 11: 00 – 12: 00 EDT • MAC telecon schedule – April 8, 10: 00 – 11: 00 EDT • Coexistence telecon schedule – April 22, 20: 00 – 21: 00 EDT • MU-MIMO telecon schedule – Thu April 15, 10: 00 -11: 00 EDT – Thu April 29, 20: 00 -21: 00 EDT Report Slide 54 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/6 of 11 -10/0413 r 0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGad March 2010 Closing Report Date: 2009 -03 -19 Authors: Report Slide 55 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This document is the closing report for TGad for the March 2010 session. Report Slide 56 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Work Completed (1/2) • New Technique Proposals • • Report 802. 11 ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259 r 2, Yuichi Morioka, Sony Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255 r 2, John Stine, Self Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264 r 3, André Bourdoux, IMEC Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245 r 1, Sudheer Grandhi, Inter. Digital Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60 GHz Systems, 10/0231 r 3, John Barr, NICT Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249 r 2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250 r 1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research Strawpolls conducted on most of the New Technique proposals to gauge support (9 strawpolls in 22 minutes) Slide 57 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Work Completed (2/2) • Channel model document development – Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60 GHz, 10/0372 r 0, Hirokazu Sawada – TGad Channel Model Update, 10/0391 r 0, Alexander Maltsev – Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, 09/0334 r 7, Alexander Maltsev • Enterprise cubicle channel model discussed bu not complete – Complete proposals in May will only simulate home living room and office conference room scenarios Report Slide 58 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Goals for May 2010 • Complete proposal presentations followed by New Technique proposal presentations – Motion passed (Y: 48, N: 1, A: 12) stating that TGad in the May 2010 session to have presentation of all three complete proposals first, followed by NT proposals presentations • Strawpolls on Complete proposals and New Technique proposals • Complete Channel Model document Report Slide 59 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Conference call times • Not overlap with TGac • April 29 – 10: 00 -12: 00 EDT – Channel modeling Report Slide 60 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/6 of 11 -10/0272 r 0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGae Closing Report – March 2010 Date: 2010 -03 -18 Authors: Report Slide 61 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/5 of 11 -10/0407 r 0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGae Task Group for the March 2010 session. Report Slide 62 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/5 of 11 -10/0407 r 0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Work Completed • Output: – Requirements and Use cases: • https: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 11/dcn/10/11 -10 -0093 -05 -00 ae-tgae-requirementsand-use-cases. doc • https: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 11/dcn/10/11 -10 -0028 -08 -000 m-lb-160 -securityand-mac-management. xls – TGae Proposal Framework: • https: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 11/dcn/10/11 -10 -0365 -03 -00 ae-proposal-forprioritization-of-management-frames. doc • Teleconferences: – Thursday 11 am ET for 1 hour on April 8, April 22, and May 6 Report Slide 63 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/5 of 11 -10/0407 r 0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGae Timeline – March 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: November ‘ 10 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: March ‘ 11 • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: May ‘ 11 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: July ‘ 11 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov ‘ 11 • Final WG/EC Approval: Mar ‘ 12 • Rev. Com/Standards Board Approval: June ‘ 12 Report Slide 64 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/5 of 11 -10/0407 r 0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 May 2010 Goals • Find an Editor and Secretary for TGae • Discuss technical presentations and proposals to form the initial draft. Report Slide 65 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/5 of 11 -10/0407 r 0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 IEEE 802. 11 TGaf Orlando Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -19 Authors: Report Slide 66 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the first meeting of IEEE 802. 11 TGaf taking place the week of March 15, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Orlando, Florida. Report Slide 67 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Agenda • Review and approve the minutes from the Los Angeles meeting and the teleconferences • Review the PAR Scope and Purpose, TG approved Principles, Purpose and Vision/Outcome • Select and approve the Technical Editor • Summary and categorization of the proposals • Review and approve 11 -10/0238 r 2 as the base text for draft 0. 01 • Review all other proposals and request normative/informative text as the TG deems appropriate • Plan for May and teleconferences Report Slide 68 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGaf Accomplishments • Approved Peter Ecclesine as the Technical Editor • Adopted 11 -10/238 r 2 as draft 0. 01 • Heard 9 other proposals – Straw polls to ask if TG wants to advance each proposal • Requested 4 presenters develop text for the draft – Others were encouraged to continue • Planned for May and teleconferences – March 30, April 13, 27, May 11 Report Slide 69 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 TGaf Timeline – Updated March 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: May 2010 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: September 2010 • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: October 2010 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: December 2010 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: January 2011 • Final WG/EC Approval: March 2011 • Rev. Com/Standards Board Approval: June 2011 Report Slide 70 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 References • • 11 -09 -0934 -09 -tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5 c 11 -10 -0021 -06 -00 af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010 11 -10 -0183 -01 -00 af-los-angeles-meeting-minutes 11 -10 -0226 -00 -00 af-feb-16 -telecon-minutes 11 -10 -0297 -00 -00 af-march-9 -teleconference-minutes 11 -10 -0299 -02 -00 af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010 11 -10 -0248 -01 -00 af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report 11 -10 -0253 -01 -00 af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedureadapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2 -hidden-node • 11 -10 -0256 -01 -00 af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedureadapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1 -synchronized-quiet • 11 -10 -0257 -01 -00 af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications Report Slide 71 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 References [2] • 11 -10 -0258 -01 -00 af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for-802 -11 af • 11 -10 -0260 -01 -00 af-radio-resource-measurement-type-andprocedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules • 11 -10 -0261 -01 -00 af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws -under-fcc-rules • 11 -10 -0262 -00 -00 af-requirements-and-amendments-regardingtvws-database-access • 11 -10 -0263 -00 -00 af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spacesoperation Report Slide 72 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7/7 of 11 -10/0405 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 JTC 1 ad hoc closing report (Mar 10) Date: 2010 -03 -19 Authors: Report Slide 73 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/3 of 11 -10/0402 r 0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract Closing report for JTC 1 ad hoc for March 2010, Orlando, USA Report Slide 74 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/3 of 11 -10/0402 r 0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 JTC 1 ad hoc reviewed items related to SB drafts, PSDO, WAPI & tutorial • Progress in Orlando (March 2010) – Reviewed status of SB drafts sent to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 • 11 u/v/p/z were sent to SC 6 – Review status of PSDO related liaison sent to SC 6 in Nov 09 • We are likely to use PSDO process for 11 mb rollup – Update on SC 6 ballot to start a New Project related to WAPI • The WAPI NP proposal was approved – Update on plans for a tutorial in Beijing in May 2010 on the Chinese standards development process • It is going ahead, and teleconferences may be needed to assist planning • Plans for Beijing (May 2010) – Consider any JTC 1 liaison issues • Identify IEEE rep for JTC 1/SC 6 meeting in London in Sept Report Slide 75 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/3 of 11 -10/0402 r 0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 IEEE 802. 11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Closing Report Date: 2010 -03 -19 Authors: Report Slide 76 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the Orlando meeting of the IEEE 802. 11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee. Report Slide 77 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Agenda • Regulatory summaries – North America – European Union – Asia • FOCUS: – EN 300 328 v 1. 8. 1 revision – The National Broadband Plan – Ofcom consultation on 600 MHz band Report Slide 78 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Accomplishments • Provided updates on relevant regulatory actions • Discussed the status of the revision of EN 300 328 • Discussed the progress of changes to the 5 GHz certification rules • Discussed the Ofcom consultation on “Digital dividend: 600 MHz band geographic interleaved spectrum; Consultation on potential uses – Will use Regulatory Ad Hoc and 802. 18 teleconferences to respond • Began the review of The National Broadband Plan Report Slide 79 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Documents • • • Report https: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 11/dcn/10/11 -10 -0279 -00 -0 reg-march-4 th-teleconference -minutes. doc http: //www. ic. gc. ca/eic/site/smt-gst. nsf/eng/sf 09821. html http: //www. ic. gc. ca/eic/site/smt-gst. nsf/eng/sf 09822. html http: //www. ofcom. org. uk/consult/condocs/clearedaward/condoc. pdf http: //www. ofcom. org. uk/consult/condocs/ddrinterleaved/interleaved. pdf http: //www. ofcom. org. uk/consult/condocs/bandmngr/condoc. pdf http: //www. ofcom. org. uk/consult/condocs/600 mhz_geographic/600 condoc. pdf http: //hraunfoss. fcc. gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296859 A 1. pdf http: //hraunfoss. fcc. gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296858 A 1. pdf http: //www. broadband. gov/download-plan http: //docbox. etsi. org/ERMTG 11/05 CONTRIBUTIONS/2010/ERMTG 11(10)0009 r 3_Working_draft_EN_300_328_v_1. 8. 1_Outcome_mtg 24. zip https: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 18/dcn/10/18 -10 -0023 -01 -0000 -ofcom-600 mhzconsultation-questions. ppt Slide 80 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Thanks to all who participated! See you in Beijing Report Slide 81 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/6 of 11 -10/0410 r 0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Smart Grid ad hoc Closing Report - March 2010 Date: 2010 -3 -18 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, +1 (321) Santa Clara, CA, 95054 427 -4098 email bkraemer@marvell. com Abstract: Information on Smart Grid activities – March 2010 Related documents Smart Grid ad hoc Meeting Report 11 -10 -0373 r 2 Smart Grid ad hoc meeting minutes 11 -10 -0419 r 0 Report Slide 82 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Agenda Topics Planned topics: 1. National Broadband plan – Smart Grid chapter http: //download. broadband. gov/plan/national-broadband-plan. pdf 2. Update on SGIP meeting of March 16 -17– Mark Klerer 3. Results and action items for NIST PAP#2 modeling • http: //collaborate. nist. gov/twikisggrid/pub/Smart. Grid/PAP 02 Wireless/PAP 2 modeling. ppt 4. Modified flow diagram representation of Use cases - Mark Klerer Subsequent conference calls and plans for May meeting Report Slide 83 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Upcoming Events • March 21 meeting at NIST to review PAP#2 progress • May 24 -27: 2 nd SGIP Face-to-Face in Santa Clara, CA. • Held in conjunction with P 2030 & Connectivity. Week. Report Slide 84 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Tough Questions • What are the consequences of not responding to the request? • How much effort, from whom, how quickly needs to be contributed to meet the request? • Could the June deadline for task completion be extended? • How will the data provided to NIST be used by other entities in influencing deployment decisions? • “Entities” range from FERC to consumer appliances • Can simulation models be useful enough without selecting and constructing channel models? Report Slide 85 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Working Assumptions • The ongoing interchange of information between power engineering and communications industry is essential. • Computer modeling communications against PE supplied uses cases is far more useful than hand waving. • Although not fully understood or quantified, there will be business incentives to being recognized as a qualified Smart Grid technology. • Although not fully understood, industry would prefer to be “actively influencing” the technology selection process rather than have it dictated to them. Report Slide 86 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Status Checklist 1. Is there a public simulator available to run? • • 802. 16 –Yes, NS 2 802. 11 – Yes, NIST Matlab 2. Has the simulator been recently executed to demonstrate it can produce useful results? – Yes, NIST Matlab for 802. 11. 3 attendees. 3. Have any of the Open. SG uses cases been modeled by industry? – No Report Slide 87 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Status Checklist 4. Has anyone volunteered to run the model on the use cases and report results? 4. In time for the March 31 NIST status meeting? 5. In time for May 802 Interim meeting? 6. In time for June NIST deadline? 5. Has any 802 participant validated the model results against other simulators or lab test? – No 6. Are there any known corrections or extensions to the models needed to model uses cases? – 802. 11 model is missing mesh – 802. 11 model has been run using only 1 Mbps, BPSK in 2. 4 GHz – Automatic rate scaling Report Slide 88 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Status Checklist 7. Is there a better way to promote uptake of model execution? – through advertising/cooperation with universities? – through outreach/cooperation with support organizations such as Zigbee, Wi-Fi, Wi. MAX – Develop one page description/advertising of PAP#2 modeling task – Dorothy & Mark will help Bruce do this 8. Are there any known clarifications to the uses cases required to provide useful results? Report Slide 89 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 8/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0282 r 1 Future Smart Grid calls • Schedule plan so far has been Wednesdays at 2 pm EST • Future call plans will be to continue this pattern – 1 per week – to July • Next call March 24 • Call topic suggestions • Review of one page task promotion • Detailed walk thru of first three use cases to determine if we need further clarification from Open SG (on March 31) • Reports on model results (from anyone) • Or note any additional commitments to run models Report Slide 90 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 10/10 of 11 -10/0420 r 0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell