Map Projections The Challenge of Map Projections Imagine

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Map Projections

Map Projections

The Challenge of Map Projections ► Imagine this: § Peel an orange, keeping the

The Challenge of Map Projections ► Imagine this: § Peel an orange, keeping the peel as one piece § Now, imagine that you have to explain to someone who has never seen an orange before, the detailed characteristics of an orange, only using simply this flat peel § How accurate a representation of the whole orange is that flat peel?

The Challenge of Map Projections ► The inherent challenge with any map projection is

The Challenge of Map Projections ► The inherent challenge with any map projection is that it is a flat, 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional sphere ► There is no map projection that does not become distorted in some way ► That being said, here are some common map projections you will see throughout you life

Positives: -It is easy to enlarge the maps (Google Maps) -It is easy to

Positives: -It is easy to enlarge the maps (Google Maps) -It is easy to read and understand -Precise towards the equator -Good to use for navigation purposes Negatives: -Very distorted. For example: Greenland looks to be as large as Africa, when in reality Africa is about 13 times larger. -Poles aren’t precise

How? - It is difficult to make something round into something flat…note the distortions

How? - It is difficult to make something round into something flat…note the distortions Example of it’s use: Google Maps

Positive: The continents are more precise (to scale) Negatives: A lot of distortion north

Positive: The continents are more precise (to scale) Negatives: A lot of distortion north and south of the equator, and east and west at the poles Ex: Africa looks to be 2 times longer than it does wide. In reality, it is about the same.

Positives: Negatives: -Good for making smaller maps (less distortion) -forms and angles aren’t precise

Positives: Negatives: -Good for making smaller maps (less distortion) -forms and angles aren’t precise

Positive: Negatives: -Nice to look at (very clear and looks precise) -Severe distortion at

Positive: Negatives: -Nice to look at (very clear and looks precise) -Severe distortion at the poles - Very little distortion

-All the parallels are straight lines -Prime Meridian is a Straight line -All others

-All the parallels are straight lines -Prime Meridian is a Straight line -All others are curved which makes it nice to look at and seems precise.

Mercator and Peters used mathematical equations to make their maps, Robinson simply just made

Mercator and Peters used mathematical equations to make their maps, Robinson simply just made maps that were easy and nice to look at….

Positive: -Good representation of the size of continents Negatives: -Hard to use (Zoom? )

Positive: -Good representation of the size of continents Negatives: -Hard to use (Zoom? ) -Hard to use for navigation (distance? )

Why Not?

Why Not?