Malignant Hyperthermia Christopher Heine MD Assistant Professor Medical

Malignant Hyperthermia Christopher Heine, MD Assistant Professor Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC

Disclosures • None

Learning Objectives • • Review a brief history of MH Background and Epidemiology Discuss the Pathophysiology/Mechanism of MH Describe the presentation of an MH reaction and its differential diagnosis Review the Perioperative Management of a suspected MH-susceptible patient Management of an MH event Postoperative Counseling options Description of how to have facility prepared

History • First described in Lancet in 1960 by Denborough & Lovell (1) • “Metabolic error of metabolism” identified as source of MH by Kalow & Britt in 1970 (2) • Dantrolene as treatment first described by Harrison in 1975 (in swine model) (3) • Ryanodine Receptor identified as source of pathology in 1988 by Mickelson et al (4)

Background • Genetic disorder of skeletal muscle that, when triggered, results in a hyper-metabolic process • Most common triggers: – Succinylcholine – Volatile Anesthetics • Nitrous Oxide is safe

Background • Hypermetabolism is result of uncontrolled release of calcium from the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of muscle cells, resulting in: – Sustained muscle contraction/rigidity – Mixed metabolic/respiratory acidosis – Hypercarbia, Hyperthermia, Tachycardia – Myoglobinuria – Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy

Epidemiology • Incidence varies from 1: 40, 000 -1: 250, 000, but may be as high as 1: 15, 000 in children • Prevalence of MH susceptibility may be as high as 1: 3, 000 (5) • United States Mortality from MH episode: – Prior to Dantrolene, as high as 70% – 1987 -2006 – 1. 4% – 2007 -2012 – 9. 5% (6)

Associated Disorders • Historically, Muscular Dystrophy (MD) patients thought to be at higher risk for MH • Evidence shows that MD patients are in fact at no higher risk than the general population… • …BUT the same triggering agents can cause hyperkalemia and rhabdomyolysis in MD patients • 3 Diseases with clearest association with MH – King-Denborough Syndrome – Central Core Disease – Multiminicore Disease

Pathophysiology • Normal Contraction – Acetylcholine is released at the neuro-muscular junction and binds to nicotinic receptors resulting in depolarization – Depolarization of the Transverse Tubules results in a change to the Dihydropyridine Receptors which opens the Ryanodine Receptors, resulting in Calcium release into the myoplasm – Calcium binds to Troponin-C which allows the interaction of actin and myosin resulting in contraction – Muscle relaxation is the result of Calcium-ATPase transporting Calcium back into the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum

Pathophysiology • Malignant Hypertension Susceptible – Most commonly the result of a mutation in the Ryanodine Receptor – Mutation results in an increased influx of Calcium from the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum which causes the marked contracture, hyper-metabolism, and rhabdomyolysis – Abnormal relaxation occurs as the Ryanodine Receptor does not close normally – The precise mechanism behind the triggering agents and their interaction with Ryanodine Receptors is unclear

Pathophysiology • Genetics – Autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance – Ryanodine Receptor mutations are responsible for 50 -70% of the MH susceptible patients • Located on Chromosome 19 – Dihydropyridine Receptor mutations on Chromosomes 1 and 7 have also been identified as possible sources – Genetic complexity may be responsible for variation in severity and clinical presentation • Also means that genetic testing’s role, although valuable, is not definitive for diagnosis – Additional Sources listed below (7 -10)

Presentation • Hyper-metabolic syndrome following exposure to triggering agent* • Usually signs occur shortly after exposure, but they can occur postoperatively • First sign is usually an increase in End-Tidal CO 2(ETCO 2) that is not amenable to increasing minute ventilation • Tachycardia, hypertension, tachypnea (if spontaneously ventilating) are non-specific but common • Masseter spasm and muscle rigidity • Hyperthermia can be an early or late finding • Presenting respiratory acidosis eventually mixes with a metabolic acidosis • Rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and cardiac arrhythmias/arrest can occur if left untreated

Differential Diagnosis • Simple explanations like hyperthermia due to warm air mattresses, hypercarbia due to hypoventilation, tachycardia due to inadequate anesthesia • Sepsis, Thyroid Storm, Pheochromocytoma, Drug Intoxication, Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome, Serotonin Syndrome • Regionally appropriate inclusions like Dengue Fever or Malaria • Despite previous belief, there are no areas that are immune to MH susceptibility*

Preoperative Management • If patient or family member has a known history of MH, they likely should receive a non-triggering anesthetic • No benefit to prophylactic Dantrolene use • Room preparation – Succinylcholine placed somewhere it can’t be accidentally administered • Rapid Sequence Intubation can be done with 1. 2 mg/kg Rocuronium if necessary – Vaporizer Canisters removed or taped to prevent administration – CO 2 absorbent, circuit, and reservoir bag replaced

Preoperative Management • Machine Preparation – Clears the machine of any residual volatile anesthesia – Traditionally, continuous fresh gas flow (FGF) of 10 L/min for at least 20 minutes was considered adequate to flush the machine – Specific guidelines dependent on machine type • “Newer” machines may require at least 120 minutes – Maintain FGF of 10 L/min throughout case to avoid volatile anesthesia concentration rebound – Alternatively, charcoal filters can be placed on the inspiratory and expiratory limbs following a 90 second flush • With FGF of at least 3 L/min, the filters have been shown to maintain volatile concentration at <5 ppm for up to 12 hours (13) – Although possibly not an option in some locations, a dedicated MH machine that has never been exposed to volatile anesthesia or the use of an ICU ventilator have been utilized

Intraoperative Management • Monitoring – Standard monitors including pulse oximeter, ECG, Noninvasive Blood Pressure, and Wave Form Capnography – Core temperature monitoring, ideally, if procedure >30 minutes • Diagnosis – Variable presentation, as mentioned earlier – If suspicious, an ABG and VBG (if available) should be obtained • ABG to determine severity of acidosis • VBG to help determine if a hypermetabolic process is ongoing

Intraoperative Management • Treatment – The earlier an MH episode is recognized and treated, the better patients do – Turn off volatile anesthetics and hyperventilate with 100% Oxygen – Inform the surgeon and discuss aborting or finishing the procedure as quickly as possible – Call for help and resuscitation drugs (MH Cart) – Call the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) at their international phone number 1 -(209)-417 -3722 – If available, charcoal filters can be placed on the circuit – Treat the patient with Dantrolene

Intraoperative Management • Dantrolene (Dantrium, Ryanodex) – Hydantoin derivative that inhibits Calcium release – Dantrium packaged as a lypholized powder with 20 mg of Dantrolene and 3 g of mannitol • Each vial must be reconstituted with 60 cc of sterile water and shaken until the solution is clear-orange in color – 22 minute reconstitution time for a single dose • Administered preferably through a large vein – Ryanodex, a newer formulation, has 250 mg of Dantrolene and 150 mg of mannitol • Each vial needs to be reconstituted with 5 cc of sterile water – 1 minute reconstitution time for a single dose – Dosing • Regardless of Dantrolene formulation, the dosing is the same • Initial Bolus 2. 5 mg/kg • Repeat bolus until signs of MH subside (over 20 mg/kg may be needed) – Administration may result in weakness, so appropriate airway management is recommended • If Dantrolene is not available, symptomatic treatment is the best option – Other Calcium Channel blockers do not treat an MH episode

Intraoperative Management • Symptomatic Treatment – Hyperthermia • If doesn’t respond to Dantrolene, external or internal cooling – Foley catheter to monitor urine output • Diurese to urine output of 1 cc/kg/hr – Dantrium contains 3 g of mannitol per vial, but Ryanodex only contains 150 mg, so particularly with Ryanodex, further diuretic use may be necessary – Arterial Line for blood pressure and labs (Creatine Kinase and Myoglobin) – Metabolic Acidosis • Sodium Bicarbonate – Hyperkalemia • Calcium, Bicarbonate, Insulin/Glucose, Beta Agonist, Hyperventilation – Cardiac Arrhythmias • Treat per ACLS and PALS guidelines – With the exception that calcium channel blockers in presence of Dantrolene may worsen cardiovascular collapse

Postoperative Management • As blood levels of Dantrolene drop, its possible to get another MH reaction after the initial episode has subsided (recrudescence) – MHAUS recommends either administering 1 mg/kg of Dantrolene every 6 hours, starting an infusion at 0. 25 mg/kg/min, or just monitoring closely for 24 -48 hours • Serial Serum Creatine Kinase for 24 -48 hours – Diuresis and Alkalization to prevent myoglobin accumulation • If patient has a known history of MH and undergoes an uneventful, triggering-agent free anesthetic, they can be discharged same day

Counseling/Testing • Clinical presentation can guide diagnosis to a certain extent (14) • For more definitive diagnosis, requires further testing which involve muscle biopsies that must be done at testing center – Caffeine-Halothane Contracture Test (CHCT) • Done in 5 locations in North America – In-Vitro Contracture Test (IVCT) • Europe • Depending on results of CHCT or IVCT, patients can be referred for genetic testing, which only requires that a sample be sent to a testing center

MH Preparedness • MHAUS website – www. mhaus. org • MHAUS hotline international phone number – 1 -(209)-417 -3722 • i. Phone App – Weight based drug dosing for Dantrolene and symptomatic treatment – $1. 99 – Supposed to be used for educational purposes only • MH Cart Drugs – – Dantrolene and drugs noted earlier for symptomatic treatment 60 cc syringes and sterile water Equipment for venous or central venous access, arterial access Ideally, equipment for labs like ABG, Creatine Kinase, Myoglobin, Coagulation Profiles, and Lactate

Summary • MH is rare and potentially lethal if not recognized quickly and treated, ideally with Dantrolene • Proper preparation and anesthetic management of patients susceptible to MH can safely be done anywhere • If feasible, patients can be sent for further testing if there is concern for an MH reaction

References 1. Denborough, M. , and Lovell, R. , “Anesthetic Deaths in a Family”. The Lancet, 1960; 2: 4546 2. Kalow, W. , Britt, B. , Terreau, M. , Haist, C. , “Metabolic Error of Muscle Metabolism After Recovery from Malignant Hyperthermia”. The Lancet, 1970; 296(7679): 895 -898 3. Harrison, G. , “Control of the Malignant Hyperpyrexic Syndrome in MHS Swine by Dantrolene Sodium”. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1975; 47(1): 62 -65 4. Mickelson, J. , Gallant, E. , Litterer, L. , Johnson, K. , Rempel, W. , Louis, C. , “Abnormal Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ryanodine Receptor in Malignant Hyperthermia”. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1988; 263(19): 9310 -9315 5. Rosenberg H, Davis M, James D, Pollock N, Stowell K: “Malignant hyperthermia. ” Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2007; 2: 21 -35. 6. Larach MG, Brandom BW, Allen GC, Gronert GA, Lehman EB: “Malignant hyperthermia deaths related to inadequate temperature monitoring, 2007 -2012: a report from the NAMHR of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the US. ” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2014; 119: 1359 -66 7. Nelson, T. , “Malignant Hyperthermia: A Pharmacogenetic Disease of Ca+2 Regulating Proteins”. Current Molecular Medicine, 2002; 2: 347 -369 8. Dirksen, S. , Larach, M. , Rosenberg, H. , et al. , “Future Directions in Malignant Hyperthermia Research and Patient Care”. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2011; 113(5): 1108 -1119

References 9. Brandom, B. , Bina, S. , Wong, C. , et al. , “Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 Gene Variants in the Malignant Hyperthermia-Susceptible Population of the United States”. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2013; 116 (5): 1078 -1086 10. Schiemann, A. , Paul, N. , Parker, R. , et al. , “Functional Characterization of 2 Known Ryanodine Receptor Mutations Causing Malignant Hyperthermia”. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2014; 118(2): 375 -380 11. Nelson, P. , Litman, R. , “Malignant Hyperthermia in Children: An Analysis of the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry”. Anesthesiology, 2014; 118(2): 369 -374 12. Punj J, Bhatnagar S, Saxena A. “Malignant hyperthermia in the Indian subcontinent: nonavailability of dantrolene – a cause for concern? ” Internet J Pharmacol 2001; 1(1). 13. Birgenheier, N. , Stoker, R. , Westenskow, D. , Orr, J. , “Activated Charcoal Effectively Removes Inhaled Anesthetics from Modern Anesthesia Machines”. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2011; 112: 1363 -1370 14. Larach MG, Localio AR, Allen GC, Denborough MA, Ellis FR, Gronert GA, Kaplan RF, et al: A clinical grading scale to predict malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology, 1994; 80: 771 -79. 15. Allen GC, Larach MG, Kunselman AR: The sensitivity and specificity of the caffeinehalothane contracture test: a report from the NAMHR. Anesthesiology, 1998; 88: 579 -88