Making the Right Diagnosis Symposium Joint Preservation Hip

Making the Right Diagnosis Symposium: Joint Preservation Hip Surgery – How to Avoid and Treat Complications and Failures Wednesday, February 16 th, 2011 Bryan T. Kelly, MD Co-Director Center for Hip Pain and Preservation

Bryan T. Kelly, MD Hospital for Special Surgery Disclosure: I DO NOT have a financial interest in any commercial products or service presented in this lecture AND DO NOT INTEND to discuss off label or investigational use of products or services.

Types of financial relationships and the companies with whom I have relationships are as follows: Pivot Medical, Inc. : Consultant Smith & Nephew: Educational Consultant A 2 Surgical: Consultant

Diagnostic Dilemma Origin of hip pain can be difficult to identify MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN INTRA - AND EXTRA-ARTICULAR PAIN

“Intraarticular Disorders” • Labral Tears – – • Hypertrophic tears (dysplasia) Hypotrophic labra Chondral Injury – – • Focal chondral defects AVN Ligamentum Teres Tears – – Partial Complete • Femoroacetabular Impingement – CAM – Pincer • Synovitis • Loose Bodies • Tumors – Synovial chondromatosis – PVNS

“Extraarticular Disorders” • Capsular Problems – – • • Pubic Pain – – – Hip Instability Adhesive Capsulitis Osteitis Pubis Chronic adductor strain Sports Hernia Snapping Hip – – • Internal Snapping Hip External Snapping Hip Lateral Hip Pain – – Recalcitrant Trochanteric Bursitis Gluteus Medius / Minimus Tears • Tendonitis / Avulsion Injuries • Nerve Compression • • • Meralgia Paresthetica (LFCN) Piriformis Syndrome (Sciatic n. ) Ilioinguinal n. Iliohypogastric n. Genitofemoral n.

History & Physical Exam

History • Mechanism of Injury: • Duration of Pain: – Location of pain: • Primary • Secondary • Aggravating Activities – – Sitting Standing Walking Sports • Clicking / Catching / Locking – Internal (Psoas) – External (ITB) – Intraarticular • Previous Surgery: – – – Hip Arthroscopy Pelvic Osteotomy Open Hip Dislcoation Hernia Surgery Back Surgery Others • Physical Therapy: – Duration – Improvement ( Yes / No )

Minimum Clinical Exam • Limp ( Yes No ) • BMI • ROM: – IR @ 90 degrees flexion – – – Flexion External Rotation Extension Abduction in supine position Craig’s Test • Provocative Pain – Impingement (FADIR) – Sub-Spine Impingement Sign (Anterior Pain with Flexion) – Superolateral impingement (Anterolateral pain with flexion / ER) – Trochanteric Pain Sign (Posterolateral pain in FABER) – Lateral Rim Impingement (Pain with abduction) – Instability (Extension / ER with Anterior Pain) – Posterior Impingement (Extension / ER with Posterior Pain) – Ischio-Femoral Impingement Sign (Post pain with Ext / IR)

Normal Passive Hip ROM • Adduction 30˚ • Abduction 45˚ • Flexion 110˚ • Extension 0˚ • IR 30˚ • ER 50˚

How do you assess ROM • IR Block Test

Provocative Pain tests • Impingement test • Flexion, adduction, internal rotation • Anterior or anteromedial pain with anterior and anterolateral impingement

Provocative Pain tests • Subspine Impingement Sign • Straight Flexion • Anterior pain from inferior impingement or sub-spine impingement

Provocative Pain tests • Superolateral Impingement • Flexion, external rotation • Anterolateral pain with superior or superolateral impingement

Provocative Pain tests • Trochanteric Pain Test • Flexion, abduction, external rotation • Posterolateral pain from trochanteric irritation

Provocative Pain tests • Lateral Rim Impingement • Straight Abduction with neutral rotation • Lateral pain from lateral rim impingement

Provocative Pain tests • Instability Test • Extension, external rotation • Anterior hip pain

Provocative Pain tests • Posterior Impingement • Extension, external rotation • Posterior hip pain

Minimum Clinical Exam • Strength – Hip Flexion – Adduction – Abduction • Palpation Pain – – – – Central Pubic Resisted Sit-Up ASIS Hip Flexors Abductors Adductors Proximal Hamstrings – Ischium • Peritrochanteric Space Exam – Pain over trochanter • Anterior • Lateral • Posterior – Weakness in Abduction • Knee Extended • Knee Flexed – Snapping

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF THE ADULT HIP • Five points for five body positions – – – STANDING SITTING SUPINE LATERAL PRONE • ADDITIONAL TESTS AS NEEDED

STANDING EXAMINATION • General – • Laxity, Body Habitus, Posture Gait – Swing, Stance, Foot Progression, Pelvis • Spine – • Lateral, Posterior, Scoliosis, Lordosis Pelvis – • Shoulder height, Iliac Crest Trendelenburg Test – Positive, Shift or Weakness

STANDING EXAMINATION • Gait a. b. c. d. Trendelenburg Abductor lurch Antalgic Foot progression angle a. b. e. Excessive External Rotation Excessive Internal Rotation Short Leg Limp

STANDING EXAMINATION • Trendelenburg Test – Weak abductors lead to the pelvis dropping to the unsupported side • With Compensation – Severe weakness the pt is unable to lift the opposite side without leaning toward the wt bearing limb to decrease the moment arm.

SEATED EXAMINATION • Neurologic – • Circulation – • • • DTRS, Sensory, Motor, Straight Leg Raise DP, PT, Popliteal Skin Lymphatic IR/ER

SUPINE EXAMINATION • Passive ROM – Flexion, Abduction, Adduction, IR, ER • Strength Testing – Flexion, Adduction, Abduction • Provocative Pain Test • Pubalgia Testing • Special Tests – Thomas Test – Patrick / Faber’s – Instability Test (extension / ER)

LATERAL EXAMINATION • Palpation GT, ABDUCTORS, SI, ISCHIAL BURSAE • Obers Test FLEXION, EXTENSION • Passive / Active ROM MEDIUS / MAX • FADDIR IMPINGEMENT • Lateral Rim Impingement

Palpation 1 SI 2 Greater Trochanter Medius, Minimus Maximus origin 3 Ischial Tuberosity 4 Piriformis

Lateral Hip Anatomy Gluteus Medius Gluteus Minimus

Dwek J. Pfirrmann C. Stanley A. Pathria M. Chung CB. MR imaging of the hip abductors: normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology at the greater trochanter. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 13(4): 691 -704, vii, 2005 Nov • 4 facets, 3 have distinct insertions

OBERS TEST ILIOTIBIAL BAND IN EXTENSION

Obers in Flexion Tight Maximus contribution Touch the table o/3 3=above neutral

Grade 0/5

Active ABD Medius vs Max Strength Grade 0/5

PRONE EXAMINATION • Craig’s Test – Femoral anteversion • Ely’s – Rectus Femoris Contracture • Hyperextension – Lumbar Spine • Palpation – Paravertebral muscles, spinous process

Anteverted 82. 6% Retroverted 17. 2% Craigs Test Elys

Anatomic Approach to Evaluation of the Non. Arthritic Hip • History • Clinical Exam • Radiographic / Mechanical Diagnosis • Intra-articular Damage Pattern – MRI / Arthrogram – Intra-operative findings

Layer 1: Osteochondral Layer Structures: Femur, Pelvis, Acetabulum Purpose: Joint congruence and normal osteo / arthro kinematics • Dynamic Impingement – Cam Impingement – Rim Impingement – Femoral Retroversion – Femoral Varus • Static Overload – Acetabular Dysplasia – Femoral Anteversion – Femoral Valgus

Radiographic Indices: Mechanical Retroversion Diagnosis (15 -20 anteversion) o <15 o [nml >25 o] >15 o [nml <10 o] >140 or <120 Alpha Angle >50 o 7. 2 mm Nml=11. 6

CT-Scan: Mechanical Diagnosis

Layer 2: Inert Layer Structures: Labrum, joint capsule, ligamentous complex, ligamentum teres Purpose: Static stability of the joint • Labral Injury • Cartilage Injury • Capsular Injury – Instability – Adhesive capsulitis

MRI

Layer 3: Contractile Layer Structures: All musculature including lumbosacral musculature Purpose: Dynamic stability • Athletic Pubalgia • Abductor Failure / Pain/ ITB • Proximal Hamstring Syndrome • Hip flexor tendonitis • Psoas dysfunction • Paraspinal dysfunction

Layer 4: Neuromechanical Layer Structures: TLS Plexus, Lumbopelvic structures, LE structures Purpose: Neuromuscular linking and functional control of the entire segment as it functions within its environment • Nerve compression syndromes • Pain syndromes • Neuromuscular dysfunction • Spine referral patterns

Neuromuscular Research Laboratory Patient Selection University of Pittsburgh Hip loaded pelvis usually rotates over fixed femur creating anterior and medial forces with rotary moments

LABRAL TEARS • Combine these forces with dynamic or static overload to the joint…

Treatment Plan The location and quality of the pain should correspond to the mechanical diagnosis and primary and secondary injury patterns. If they do, then correcting the mechanical problems and primary and secondary injuries should lead to a good outcome….

Thank You