Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Models Masha Kuznetsova CCMCNASA GSFC

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Models Masha Kuznetsova CCMC/NASA GSFC http: //ccmc. gsfc. nasa. gov R

Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Models Masha Kuznetsova CCMC/NASA GSFC http: //ccmc. gsfc. nasa. gov R 2 O Workshop October 15 -18, 2007

Global Magnetosphere Model (SWMF, Gombosi et al. ) Driven by Solar Wind at Inflow

Global Magnetosphere Model (SWMF, Gombosi et al. ) Driven by Solar Wind at Inflow Boundary at 33 RE Real-Time Simulations 33 RE Solar wind measured by ACE: 15 - 45 min prediction. Sun Solar wind provided by Enlil Cone Model: 24 - 48 hours prediction (during Halo CME only)

Visualization of the State of the Magnetosphere • 2 D slices (north-south cut, equatorial

Visualization of the State of the Magnetosphere • 2 D slices (north-south cut, equatorial cut, lat-long maps) – 24 hours history movies (end at the release time) – 24 hours movies ahead of real time (end 15 -45 min after the release time) – 48 hours prediction movies (start at the release time) • Time evolution of parameters characterizing the state of the magnetosphere/ionosphere – 24 hours history plots (end at the release time) – 24 hours plots (end 15 -45 min after the release time) – 48 hours prediction plots (start at the release time) 3/10/2021

Overview of the Global State of the Magnetosphere: North-South Cut Magnetopshere hit by CME

Overview of the Global State of the Magnetosphere: North-South Cut Magnetopshere hit by CME Density (color, log scale), Velocity (vectors), Magnetic field (lines) Quiet magnetopshere Substorm onset reconnection onset 3/10/2021 Near-earth reconnection causes energetic particle injection at geosynch. orbit, drive geomagnetically induced currents.

Magnetopause Position (Equatorial Cut) Quiet magnetopshere GOES 11&12 magnetopause position Magnetopause within 1 RE

Magnetopause Position (Equatorial Cut) Quiet magnetopshere GOES 11&12 magnetopause position Magnetopause within 1 RE of the geosynch. orbit 3/10/2021 Magnetopause cross the geosynch. orbit

Magnetopause Standoff geosynch. orbit magnetopause position: projection of boundary between open and closed field

Magnetopause Standoff geosynch. orbit magnetopause position: projection of boundary between open and closed field lines on equatorial plane Magnetopause Standoff Evolution with Time magnetopause standoff distance geosynch. orbit Time 3/10/2021

Polar Cap Boundary between open and closed field lines SEP have free access along

Polar Cap Boundary between open and closed field lines SEP have free access along the open field lines open FL Energetic particles precipitation from the tail 3/10/2021 closed FL Polar cap boundary observed by POLAR VIS Earth Camera

Ionospheric Field-Aligned Currents and Polar Cap Storm Time Quiet Time Polar Cap Size Evolution

Ionospheric Field-Aligned Currents and Polar Cap Storm Time Quiet Time Polar Cap Size Evolution with Time 3/10/2021 Time

Cross Cap Ionospheric Potential Difference F min F max D F = F max

Cross Cap Ionospheric Potential Difference F min F max D F = F max - F min Quiet: < 75 ke. V Moderate: 100 - 150 ke. V F max F min Cross Cap Ionospheric Time Evolution Storm: > 250 ke. V Large D F affect density distribution in ionosphere, drive GIC Northern Hemisphere Sourthern Hemisphere 3/10/2021 Time

Joule Dissipation in the Ionosphere Jdiss = F Jr ds Ionospheric Potential Quiet: <

Joule Dissipation in the Ionosphere Jdiss = F Jr ds Ionospheric Potential Quiet: < 100 GW surface integral Radial Current Moderate: 100 - 200 GW Storm: > 400 GW Joule Dissipation in the Ionosphere Time Evolution Northern Hemisphere Sourthern Hemisphere 3/10/2021 Time

Fok Ring Current Model Driven by SWMF: Equatorial H+ fluxes 61. 2 Ke. V

Fok Ring Current Model Driven by SWMF: Equatorial H+ fluxes 61. 2 Ke. V 300 Ke. V 138. 6 Ke. V Quiet geosynch. orbit Storm Ring current H+ fluxes at LANL-02 A geosynch. satellite Substorm injection at geosynch. orbit Time

Fok Radiation Belt Model: Equatorial e- Fluxes 100 Ke. V 1 Me. V 4

Fok Radiation Belt Model: Equatorial e- Fluxes 100 Ke. V 1 Me. V 4 Mev Quiet geosynch. orbit 100 Ke. V 1 Me. V 4 Mev Storm 3/10/2021

Geomagnetically Induced Total Electric Field Quiet 3/10/2021 Storm

Geomagnetically Induced Total Electric Field Quiet 3/10/2021 Storm

Global Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) Proxy Quiet 3/10/2021 Storm Different colors of the background

Global Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) Proxy Quiet 3/10/2021 Storm Different colors of the background indicate the severity of the activity.

SWMF Driven by Solar Wind Modeled by Enlil: Predicted Parameters Characterizing Global State of

SWMF Driven by Solar Wind Modeled by Enlil: Predicted Parameters Characterizing Global State of the Magnetosphere/Ionosphere 24 -48 hours prediction, 10 -20 % uncertainty • Time of geomagnetic activity onset • Duration of severe geomagnetic activity • Magnitude of geomagnetic activity – Magnetopause cross/touch/approach geosynch. orbit – Max value of Joule dissipation – Max value of polar cap size – Max value of cross cap ionospheric potential difference – Max GIE and GIC – Max particle fluxes Opportunities for comparison SWMF driven by Enlil SW (24 - 48 hours prediction) with SWMF driven by ACE SW 3/10/2021 (15 – 45 min prediction).

Global Ionosphere Models Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (USU-GAIM, Schunk et al. ) USU-GAIM

Global Ionosphere Models Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (USU-GAIM, Schunk et al. ) USU-GAIM uses a physics-based Ionosphere Forecast Model (IFM). USU-GAIM assimilates electron density (Ne) profiles from a diverse set of realtime (or near real-time) measurements: - slant TEC from GPS ground stations via RINEX files, - bias information for GPS satellites and ground-stations, - electron density profiles from DISS ionosondes via SAO files Ionosphere Forecast Model (IFM) needs - F 10. 7, daily Ap, 3 -hour Kp indices ` - neutral wind, electric field, auroral precipitation, solar EUV (empirical inputs) Abby. Normal Model (Eccles et al. , Space Environment Corporation) calculates absorption values for HF signals 3/10/2021

USU-GAIM Model: Total Electron Content (TEC) Normal TEC Increased TEC 3/10/2021

USU-GAIM Model: Total Electron Content (TEC) Normal TEC Increased TEC 3/10/2021

Abby. Normal Model: Absorption Values for HF Signals Vertically Integrated Signal Loss in Decibels

Abby. Normal Model: Absorption Values for HF Signals Vertically Integrated Signal Loss in Decibels for 5 and 10 MHz HF Signals Normal Absoption 3/10/2021 Increased Absoption