LUSI WBS 1 4 XRay Correlation Spectroscopy Final

LUSI WBS 1. 4 X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status Eric Bong April 21, 2009 XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Outline • WBS 1. 4 Scope – Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables • Progress since PIDR • Status – Engineering/Design Status – Cost & Schedule Performance – Critical Path – Risk Identification & Mitigation – Safety • Summary XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 2 2 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

WBS 1. 3 – Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables Early Finish – January 2012 Early Finish – August 2011 XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 (B/L Early Finish – November 2012) 3 3 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Progress Since PIDR • • BCR - Reconfiguration of XCS Instrument – Moved Large Offset Monochromator – Addition of “Post Monochromator” to project scope – Moved Split & Delay into alcove upstream of Hutch 4 – Relocated diagnostics to characterize beam before and after the monochromators – Eliminated long beam-line transport in XRT Beam-Line Design – Extensive modification of LLNL design required – Negotiated redesign of XRT to minimize re-work – Split redesign cost with LCLS – Now far less rework required to install XCS components XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 4 4 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Progress Since CD-2 • Translation of XCS onto CXI Line – Supports Early Science • Documentation for Long Lead Procurement – PRDs, ESDs, SOWs, • Diffractometer • Large Angle Detector Mover • Large Offset Monochromator • – Held Long Lead Procurement Review, April 23, 2009 Commercial alternative for diagnostic stopper – Vendor indicates modification of existing stopper design to add B 4 C wafer on face is possible – Savings of design and fabrication time – Updates P 3 to indicate change in acquisition strategy XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 5 5 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Progress Since CD-2 • XCS Engineering/Design staff – Added 1 Mech Engineer / Designer – February 2009 – Added 2 Mech Engineer / Designers – May 2009 • Preliminary Design Reviews (PDRs) – – – Vacuum: XRT & Hutch 4 Supports: XRT & Hutch 4 Granite Tables Large Angle Mover Vacuum Assembly PDRs complete • Baseline vibration data obtained in the LCLS Far Experimental Hall Vertical/Horizontal PSD, 1 -100 Hz (Compliments P. Montanez, J. Turner) XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 6 6 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering & Design Status • Engineering & Design Staff – Ted Osier, Michael Kosovsky, Henry Alvarez, Navtej Hundal, Eric Bong Hutch 4 Optics, Diffractometer Large Angle detector Mover X-Ray Transport Hall (XRT) Split and Delay Area XCS Instrument Scientist Aymeric Robert Post-Monochromator XCS Visiting Scientist Soo-Heyong Lee Large Offset Monochromator XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 7 7 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 1 Documentation CAD system model documentation hierarchy (CAD Drawing Tree/File Structure) released XRT& FEH H 4 beamline layouts complete with all available models implemented & updated PRDs/ESDs/ICDs/Purchasing Specs – complete. Hutch Design Reviewed 30%, 60%, 90% & 100% A&E drawings FEH Hutch construction – June thru December 2009 (LCLS) APP and Risk Identification/Registry complete and up to date XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 8 8 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

• Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 2 XCS Optic & Support Tables (WBS 1. 4. 2) – Hutch 4 Granite Support Tables (WBS 1. 4. 2. 2) • • Modification of XPP support table design Granite base with movable strong-back PDR 29 May 2009 Leveraging existing designs (when applicable) reduces overall engineering & design effort. Use of common parts reduces maintenance costs. • Safety: Earthquake restraint of granite base, covered pinch points. • Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $200 k – Stoppers (WBS 1. 4. 2. 3) • Diagnostic stoppers not PPS. • Changed plan from modification to PPS stopper design to Commercial Item. • Worked with vendor on modification of an offthe shelf product to incorporate 10 mm on face of stopper. Commercial stopper uses same controls as vacuum valves. • Issued BCR to change P 3. • Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $187 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 9 9 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

• Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 4 • XCS Large Angle Detector Mover (WBS XCS Diffractometer (WBS 1. 4. 4. 1) – Planed as SLAC assemble. Changed to build to spec, same as XPP. Processed BCR. – PRD, ESD & Purchase Spec complete – Procurement Review Held. – Ready to release RFQ – Safety: Earthquake restraint pinch points, interlock of automatic motion. – Design reviews required at vendor. – LUSI controls interface required. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $685 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 1. 4. 4. 3) – Processed BCR to split effort between carriage motion and upper assemblies. • Carriage motion build to spec. • Vacuum, detector positioner and beam stop; SLAC design. – – PRD, ESD & Purchase Spec complete. Procurement Review Held. Requisition in purchasing. Safety: Earthquake restraint pinch points, interlock of automatic motion. – Design reviews required at vendor for carriage. – LUSI controls interface required. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $856 k 10 10 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 5 • XCS Hutch Utilities (WBS 1. 4. 5) – Hutch layout design complete. – LCLS responsible for hutch construction. – Crane installation moved from LUSI to LCLS – XCS responsible scientist and engineer involved hutch 4 specification and design reviews. – Tasks to be completed by XCS • Raised flooring • Storage cabinets, work benches and tool chests • Utilities distribution – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $369 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 11 11 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 6 • XCS XRT Vacuum (WBS 1. 4. 6. 1) – – – Quantity of drift tubes finalized. Vacuum component selection complete. Vacuum support design well advanced. Completed preliminary design report. Ready to purchase all vacuum equipment. – Safety: Pressure vessel code requirements mitigated using burst disks. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $363 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 • XCS Hutch 4 Vacuum (WBS 1. 4. 6. 2) – Designed to shift to CXI line. – Vacuum component selection complete. – Uses many XRT support designs. – Completed preliminary design report. – Ready to purchase all vacuum equipment. – Safety: Pressure vessel code requirement mitigated using burst disks. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $400 k 12 12 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 7 • XCS Installation (WBS 1. 4. 7) – LUSI Installation Coordinator • • Obtain required installation permits. Conduct daily tailgate meeting w/ UTR (University Technical Representative). Conduit to engineering for field installation issues. Provide installation status for incorporation into LUSI schedule. – XCS XRT Installation • Phased with LCLS and CXI installations. • Advanced schedule could combine all XCS XRT installation with CXI except monochromators. • Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $351 k – XCS Hutch 4 Installation • Early Science – All components except XCS detector – Install duplicate XPP detector to commission and early science – Early Finish – June 2011 • CD-4 – XCS Detector – Early Finish – January 2012 • Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $613 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 13 13 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Engineering/Design Status 1. 4. 6 • Large Offset Mono (WBS 1. 5. 3. 1 ) – Planed as build to specification. • Vendor build complete • Option for SLAC to build crystal holder – PRD, ESD & Purchase Spec complete. – Procurement Review Held. – Review requires revisions to PRD, ESD & Purchase Spec – Safety: Earthquake restraint. – Design reviews required at vendor for carriage. – LUSI controls interface required. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $1, 778 k XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 • 1. 5. 3. 7 Post Mono (WBS 1. 4. 6. 2) – Fabrication of existing ANL design. – ANL drawings have been requested. – SLAC will review drawings prior to purchasing components. – Safety: Earthquake restraint. – LUSI controls interface required. – Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $455 k 14 14 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

XCS Instrument Design Status Summary System/Component 1. 4. 1 Review Integration Baseline Advanced FIDR 8/5/09 6/30/09 1. 4. 2. 2 Hutch Granite Table PDR 6/29/09 5/29/09 1. 4. 2. 3 Diagnostic Stopper COTS 6/9/09 5/15/09 1. 4. 4. 1 Diffractometer LLPR 4/21/09 4/23/09 1. 4. 4. 3 Large Angle Mover Carriage LLPR 12/14/09 4/23/09 1. 4. 4. 3 Large Angle Mover Vacuum PDR 1. 4. 5. 1 Hutch Specification FDR 2/28/09 1. 4. 5. 2 Hutch Utilities & Equipment PDR 10/2/09 1. 4. 6. 1 XCS XRT Vacuum Design PDR 3/4/09 5/19/09 1. 4. 6. 2 XCS H 4 Vacuum Design PDR 3/2/09 5/19/09 1. 5. 3. 1 Large Offset Monochromator LLPR 6/5/09 4/23/09 1. 5. 3. 7 Chanel Cut Monochromator PR 8/31/09 XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 15 15 5/29/09 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Cost and Schedule Performance (2) Cum data through Feb 09 CPI = 1. 08 = BCWP/ACWP SPI = 0. 96 = BCWP/BCWS XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 16 16 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Cost Performance Report March Data April Data XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 17 17 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

XCS Critical Path DCO X-ray Focusing Lens and Harmonic Rejection Mirror Awards DCO Harmonic Rejection Mirror Preliminary Design Review XCS Diagnostics Stopper Design Effort • • Removing budgetary constraints will move critical path to XCS long lead items Re-plan of stopper acquisition will move stopper off critical path XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 18 18 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

XCS Look Ahead • Six month “look-ahead” of XCS Instrument milestones – ARRA advanced schedule • Purchasing started on Diffractometer and Detector Mover Carriage. • Large Offset Monochromator purchasing start requires revision of specifications dictated by procurement review. • Non LLP item purchasing must wait for CD 3 approval. XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 19 19 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Risk Identification & Mitigation • Risk Identification/Registry complete and up to date as per “LCLS Risk Management Plan” PMD 1. 1 -002 -r 4 • 15 risks identified at CD-2 for XCS WBS 1. 4 – 5 Risks for BNL Detector • • • Schedule - late MOU Schedule - late design Schedule - late fabrication Schedule - late testing Technical – does not meet requirements – 5 Risks each for Large Angle Detector Mover & Diffractometer • • • Schedule – Procurement Placement Schedule - late design Schedule - late fabrication Schedule - late testing Technical – does not meet requirements • 2 risks identified at CD-2 for DCO Monochromator WBS 1. 5. 3. 1 – 2 Risks for Monochromator • Schedule – Manufacturing • Technical – Optical Stability XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 20 20 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Safety • LUSI Hazard Analysis Report (PM-391 -001 -34) complete • Safety issues are considered at every stage of the design, fabrication and installation process • Safety considerations (some examples) – Ionizing Radiation • Hutch walls will comply with SLAC Radiation Safety memo RP-RPG-080606 -MEM-01 • Hutch PPS – Pressure/Vacuum Vessel Safety • Compliant with 10 CFR 851 – Seismic Safety • Designs compliant with: Seismic Design Specification for Buildings, Structures, Equipment, and Systems, SLAC-I-720 -0 A 24 E-002 -R 002 – Mechanical • Interlocks for equipment protection • Engineered solutions that prevent potential “pinch-points” with moving machinery – Hoisting and Rigging • Positioning of devices that require the use of the FEH H 4 overhead crane shall be performed by only by qualified personnel with an approved lift plan. XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 21 21 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Summary • XCS instrument configuration design is complete. • All preliminary design reviews complete. • XCS scope is stable following BCR to move monochromators. • Acquisition strategy for stoppers and large angle detector has been integrated into the schedule. • Long Lead Procurement Review for diffractometer, large angle detector mover and large offset monochromator has been completed. • Purchasing of LLP items has begun. • Releasing budgetary constraints moved critical path to long lead procurement items. • Scheduled early CD 3 spending authority advances schedule. • ARRA funding re-baseline advances XCS schedule providing early science in August 2011. XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 22 22 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 23 23 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Expanded CSSR – by CAM XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 24 24 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu

Control Accounts & Work Packages – by WBS L 2 XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 25 25 E. Bong BONG@slac. stanford. edu