LUSI Coherent XRay Imaging Instrument Final Instrument Design

LUSI Coherent X-Ray Imaging Instrument Final Instrument Design Review INTRODUCTION Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 3, 2009 LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

LUSI WBS Organization WBS LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 TITLE 1. 1 Project Management 1. 2. X-ray Pump Probe Instrument (XPP) 1. 3 Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument (CXI) 1. 4 X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument (XCS) 1. 5 Diagnostics and Common Optics (DCO) 1. 6 Controls and Data Acquisition (CDA) 2 2 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project description (1) LUSI is Providing Instruments for Three of the Six LCLS Instrument Hutches Near Experimental Hall 1 2 SXR AMO Part of LCLS X-ray Transport Far Experimental Hall 3 4 XCS Mono XPP XCS 5 6 CXI H 6 Installation Part of LCLS FES ARRA Funds Beam Transport LCLS LUSI Offset Monochromator Exp. Chamber Detector H 6 LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 3 3 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project description (2) CXI WBS 1. 3 X-ray transport tunnel (200 m) LCLS SXR XCS WBS 1. 4 XPP WBS 1. 2 XCS Offset Monochromator WBS 1. 5 H 6 LCLS AMO LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 4 4 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Status (1) LUSI Baseline Performance (through Apr 09) TPC = $60 M (MIE = $55. 1 M, OPC = $4. 9 M) CD-4 = August 2012 TPC >26% Complete, TEC >18% Complete Contingency on MIE = $11. 8 M 33. 2% on remaining work OPC is complete $50 K remaining for close-out ARRA Funds ($33. 6 M) Received in April Part of the $60 M TPC Most recent added scope to enhance LUSI science program Large Offset Monochromator for XPP Focusing lens for CXI LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 5 5 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Status (2) Design Completion XPP Instrument Design through FIDR CD-3 Ready CXI Instrument FIDR in June 90% CD-3 Ready Now - Solid Instrument Configuration XCS Instrument FIDR in June 90% CD-3 Ready Now - Instrument configuration is solid Diagnostics and Common Optics Design 90% CD-3 Ready Now Harmonic Rejection Mirror PDR in June Controls and Data Acquisition 100% CD-3 Ready Now Inherited Designs from LCLS comprise many items LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 6 6 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Status (3) Still waiting for the DOE-IPR Status Review Report Responses have been prepared to the close-out report recommendations Preparing for the July 15, 2009 CD-3 Review Held in Germantown LUSI PM, Instrument Scientists and Controls Rep to travel Working on the second part of the Baseline Change to incorporate ARRA effects into the baseline Still need to incorporate two L 2 milestones into schedule and adjust schedules appropriately (Waiting on TCCC) First month of reporting on ARRA accounts has been completed Some corrections are needed to the baseline – These will be incorporated in May LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 7 7 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

April Milestone Status LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 8 8 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Schedule Advancement Milestone Current Baseline Advanced Baseline April 2010 October 2009 XPP Early Science October 2010 CXI Early Science August 2011 June 2011 XCS Early Science (New) NA August 2011 Project Ready for CD-4 (New) NA March 2012 August 2012 CD-3 CD-4 XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 9 9 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

April Status LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 10 10 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Risks and Mitigation LUSI Follows the LCLS Risk Management Plan and uses the LCLS Risk Registry LCLS Project Management Document 1. 1 -002 Risk Registry Updated May, 2009 Major Risks Do something to cause loss or suspension of ARRA funds Annual funding - Continuing Resolutions (Retired) Foreign procurements – Dollar fluctuation, sole source Loss and/or availability of critical personnel (Exercised) Ability to place procurements in a timely manner CXI mirror delivery, performance XPP, XCS Monochromator delivery, performance XPP, XCS Detector delivery, performance LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 11 11 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Part of an Advance Procurement Review LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 12 12 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS Directorate – Detail 1/2009 LCLS Directorate Dale Knutson Mark Reichanadter, Deputy ESH / Work Planning & Control Michael Scharfenstein Richard Hislop Administration Helen O’Donnell, LA De Wan, B. Espiritu, D. Ford, S. Matni, R. Matter, D. Mitchell, P. Tank Special Projects Richard M. Boyce Uli Wienands Accelerator Systems Division Experimental Facilities Division John Seeman Jochen Schneider TBD - Deputy TBD - Chief Operating Officer P. Miller, Accelerator Safety Officer Business Office Cindy Lowe TBD - Deputy TBD – Beam Line Safety Officer Engineering & Physics Division Strategic Projects Division Dave Schultz James Krebs, Deputy John Galayda TBD – ES&H Coordinator LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 13 13 M. Scharfenstein – Construction Safety T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Strategic Projects Division (SPD) John Galayda M. Scharfenstein, Construction Safety Project Org = 83 FTEs Project Org = 7 FTEs LCLS Construction Project J. Galayda M. Reichanadter, Deputy J. Albino, AD, Civil Const. LUSI MIE Project T. Fornek TBD, Deputy RSB J. Albino G. Herman, K. Chan-Hui PULSE D. Rich Project Org = 27 FTEs Project Org = 10 FTEs Future Upgrades J. Galayda LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 14 14 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

LUSI Project’s Integrated Project Team DOE-HQ Harriet Kung, Acquisition Executive T. E. Kiess, Program Manager DOE-SSO H. Joma DOE Federal Project Director Instrument Team Leaders Technical Configuration Control Committee. WBS 1. 2 XPP IIT D. Fritz (Instr. Scientist) LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 SLAC T. Fornek LUSI Project Manager RM Boyce - Deputy WBS 1. 3 CXI IIT S. Boutet (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1. 4 XCS IIT A. Robert (Instr. Scientist) 15 15 DOE-SSO Support LCLS Directorate Support Engineering, Procurement, QA, ES&H, Finance & Budget, PMCS Installation Manager B. Poling WBS 1. 5 Diagnostics & Common Optics Y. Feng (Lead Scientist) WBS 1. 6 Data Acquisition & Controls G. Haller (Lead) T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

Schedule Advancement Milestone Current Baseline Advanced Baseline April 2010 October 2009 XPP Early Science October 2010 CXI Early Science August 2011 June 2011 XCS Early Science (New) NA August 2011 Project Ready for CD-4 (New) NA March 2012 August 2012 CD-3 CD-4 XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 16 16 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

CHARGE - 1 Technical Scope Is the design of the partial instrument mature and technically sound to enable early scientific experiments at LCLS? Have all of the major interfaces been identified and incorporated in the design? Have design reviews been performed? Is the design likely to meet performance expectations? Management Is the instrument team organized and staffed to successfully achieve the milestone? Have all the major risks been identified and effectively managed? Are procurements appropriately planned for the partial instrument? LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 17 17 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu

CHARGE - 2 Cost and Schedule Are the cost and schedule reasonable to achieve the planned scope? Have the CXI cost and schedule been recently updated? Is there sufficient cost and schedule contingency to ensure successful completion of the partial instrument on schedule? ES&H Are all related ES&H aspects being properly addressed? Overall Readiness Is CXI ready to begin fabrication and installation at LCLS to begin conducting early scientific experiments? LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 18 18 T. Fornek tomf@slac. stanford. edu