Longitudinal accumulation in triple RF systems Gang Xu

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Longitudinal accumulation in triple RF systems Gang Xu IHEP, Beijing 100049, China Workshop on

Longitudinal accumulation in triple RF systems Gang Xu IHEP, Beijing 100049, China Workshop on Injection and Injection System, Berlin, Germany, Aug. 28~30, 2017

Topics • Longitudinal dynamics • Potential(Plot) • Phase-space(Plot) • Bunch lengthening • RF Errors

Topics • Longitudinal dynamics • Potential(Plot) • Phase-space(Plot) • Bunch lengthening • RF Errors effects • Case with less momentum acceptance • Summary

Longitudinal dynamics h=720,E 0=6000,αp=3. 667*10 -5,U 0=1. 995,Φ=π h αp E 0 δacc=0. 03,Vacc=δacc

Longitudinal dynamics h=720,E 0=6000,αp=3. 667*10 -5,U 0=1. 995,Φ=π h αp E 0 δacc=0. 03,Vacc=δacc 2 Φ,Taking ϕs=π will not lost generality

1 st and 3 rd RF combination • Form two separate RF stable buckets

1 st and 3 rd RF combination • Form two separate RF stable buckets for the injection bunch and storage bunch • To merge two bunches RF parameters must be changed(ramp) • There is a potential barrier between the two Separate RF stable buckets • Making bunch lengthening to increase beam lifetime

Potential A local minimum is a bunch center Potential barrier make the two bunches

Potential A local minimum is a bunch center Potential barrier make the two bunches separate

1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd RF combination • In order to remove

1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd RF combination • In order to remove the potential barrier, the 2 nd harmonic can be introduced • There will increase two parameters(voltage and phase) , the solution will be not sole as for only 1 st and 3 rd combination • Using simple program to find the solutions

Local maximum hints the momentum acceptance and bucket width There is not any point

Local maximum hints the momentum acceptance and bucket width There is not any point make V’[φ]=0 between local minimum and local maximum, so only one bunch in one period (for the fundamental RF frequency)

Bunch length 4. 2 cm 2. 1 ns 2. 5 ns

Bunch length 4. 2 cm 2. 1 ns 2. 5 ns

Bunch lengthening • Transverse beam size very small, bunch lengthening will increase the beam

Bunch lengthening • Transverse beam size very small, bunch lengthening will increase the beam lifetime • V’[φ]=0 in the mean time V’’[φ]=0 • There are many solution can satisfy these conditions

Potential Locally zoom Green line is just the curve in the page 8 Longer

Potential Locally zoom Green line is just the curve in the page 8 Longer bunch will make the distance decrease between injection point and the bunch center

Red one a little bit better than “original” one(longer bunch and farther distance between

Red one a little bit better than “original” one(longer bunch and farther distance between injection bunch and bunch center )

Errors effects two types effects: (Voltage 0. 3%, Phase 0. 3 Random seeds 100000)

Errors effects two types effects: (Voltage 0. 3%, Phase 0. 3 Random seeds 100000) bunch shorten and the distance between inject point and the center change nearer farther

Distance between inject point and bunch center Red line is the original,left(nearer) 40%,right(farther) 50.

Distance between inject point and bunch center Red line is the original,left(nearer) 40%,right(farther) 50. 63%。 This means the bunch center change continuously.

Bunch length change( original 4. 2 cm): 1. 2 cm~4. 2 cm

Bunch length change( original 4. 2 cm): 1. 2 cm~4. 2 cm

Errors effects: 2 nd type, one stable bucket splits into two buckets V’=0 at

Errors effects: 2 nd type, one stable bucket splits into two buckets V’=0 at two points

Errors effects on different bunch length

Errors effects on different bunch length

Errors effects for short bunch case(V’’=0, 1. 2 cm) Small bunch occurs: 5. 6%.

Errors effects for short bunch case(V’’=0, 1. 2 cm) Small bunch occurs: 5. 6%. 94. 4% is the bunch center shaking

 • Find the new solutions with V’=0, but V’’≠ 0, bunch length 1.

• Find the new solutions with V’=0, but V’’≠ 0, bunch length 1. 05 cm • Do errors effects again

Bunch center shaking, small bunch occurs less than 0. 01%。 Bunch center shaking less

Bunch center shaking, small bunch occurs less than 0. 01%。 Bunch center shaking less than 0. 05 rad(<48 ps)。

δacc=2. 5% solution with less momentum acceptance, the distance between inject point and bunch

δacc=2. 5% solution with less momentum acceptance, the distance between inject point and bunch center is almost same as δacc=3%

Summary • With 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd harmonic RF systems combination(fundamental

Summary • With 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd harmonic RF systems combination(fundamental frequency 166. 6 MHz), one can get a stable RF buckets with far enough distance between injecting and circulating bunches • The distance(about 3. 06 rad/2. 9 ns) is matched with our kicker system(6 ns bottom width) • RF system does not need ramping as the 1 st and 3 rd harmonic combination to avoid RF aging and bunch length changing • The solution still need optimization. • More simulation including to errors of KICKERs system, beam collective effects, etc.

Thanks for your attention!

Thanks for your attention!