Local Road Safety Domestic Scan Findings AASHTO Standing

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation
Local Road Safety Domestic Scan Findings AASHTO Standing Committee on Highway Safety Annual Meeting

Local Road Safety Domestic Scan Findings AASHTO Standing Committee on Highway Safety Annual Meeting 1

GOALS and OBJECTIVES • Model local road safety programs and delivery mechanisms ⁻ Funding

GOALS and OBJECTIVES • Model local road safety programs and delivery mechanisms ⁻ Funding ⁻ Coordination ⁻ Technical assistance • Share noteworthy practices ⁻ Launch a local road safety program ⁻ Identify next steps ⁻ Improve an established program 2

SCAN STATES Michigan Minnesota New Jersey Illinois Alabama Georgia Washington Montana North Dakota Minnesota

SCAN STATES Michigan Minnesota New Jersey Illinois Alabama Georgia Washington Montana North Dakota Minnesota Maine Vermont Oregon Idaho South Dakota Wyoming Michigan Nebraska California Nevada Utah New York Wisconsin Pennsylvania Iowa Ohio Illinois Indiana Colorado Kansas Missouri Arizona New Mexico Oklahoma Arkansas Mississippi. Alabama Texas New Hampshire Connecticut New Jersey District of Columbia West Virginia Kentucky Tennessee Massachusetts Delaware North Carolina Maryland South Carolina Georgia Louisiana Alaska Florida Hawaii Puerto Rico 3

SCAN TEAM MEMBERS • FHWA • AASHTO ⁻ Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety

SCAN TEAM MEMBERS • FHWA • AASHTO ⁻ Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety (SCOHTS) • American Public Works Association (APWA) 4 • National Association of County Engineers (NACE) • Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) • VHB

STATE REPRESENTATIVES State Department of Transportation County and Municipality MPO and Other Regional Agencies

STATE REPRESENTATIVES State Department of Transportation County and Municipality MPO and Other Regional Agencies Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Law Enforcement LTAP FHWA Division Office 5

NOTEWORTHY PRACTICES • Data Collection & Analysis • Local Project Identification Process • Local

NOTEWORTHY PRACTICES • Data Collection & Analysis • Local Project Identification Process • Local Project Administration • Funding • Training & Technical Assistance • Outreach & Partnerships Noteworthy Programs/Projects 6

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS • Collection • Tools • Technical Assistance & Data Support

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS • Collection • Tools • Technical Assistance & Data Support 7

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Collection • • • 8 Funding collection on local road

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Collection • • • 8 Funding collection on local road Routine collection of crashes on all roads Geo-coding Data Warehouse Routine collection of other local road data

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Tools • Data Analysis Features ⁻ ⁻ Generate reports and

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Tools • Data Analysis Features ⁻ ⁻ Generate reports and tables Create crash diagrams Data mining Narrative data searching • Local Agency Benefits ⁻ Accessibility ⁻ Better allocation of resources and funds 9

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Technical Assistance • Data Analysis – – crash profiles for

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Technical Assistance • Data Analysis – – crash profiles for local roads, crash maps, daily crash reports, corridor analysis • Training – data analysis, – use and access of data software 10

Local Project Identification Process Overall – Data Driven Processes • • • 11 Systematic

Local Project Identification Process Overall – Data Driven Processes • • • 11 Systematic • RSA Corridor • SHSP Multi-disciplinary • Targeted Funding MPO Planning Process B/C analysis

Local Project Administration • Dedicated Staff for Local Road Programs • Streamlining the Federal-aid

Local Project Administration • Dedicated Staff for Local Road Programs • Streamlining the Federal-aid Process – abbreviated contract – force Account – joint Application – lump sum line item – STIP, TIP 12

Local Project Administration • Application Guidelines ⁻ Joint methodology development ⁻ Staggered application process

Local Project Administration • Application Guidelines ⁻ Joint methodology development ⁻ Staggered application process ⁻ Funds authorized in award fiscal year (notice to prepare for funding) ⁻ Single application for all safety program/funds ⁻ Joint applications ⁻ Training 13

Funding • Distribution ⁻ ⁻ 100% HRRRP funds Varying percentage of HSIP Based on

Funding • Distribution ⁻ ⁻ 100% HRRRP funds Varying percentage of HSIP Based on crash data State statutory requirement • Incentives ⁻ Local match provided by state ⁻ Funds PE and application preparation 14

Training & Technical Assistance • Required training for safety funds • RSA Peer-to-Peer •

Training & Technical Assistance • Required training for safety funds • RSA Peer-to-Peer • Law enforcement training – RSA and Traffic Engineering • Safety for Local Officials • MUTCD for Locals • Annual Safety Summit 15

Outreach & Partnerships • • • 16 Accessibility – DOT and FHWA Division Safety

Outreach & Partnerships • • • 16 Accessibility – DOT and FHWA Division Safety Task Forces and Coalitions Special Safety Coordinators Law enforcement Other Public and Private Sector Stakeholders Special Safety Programs (MI Local Safety Initiative)

A Local Agency Success Georgia: Douglas County Curve Safety Action Plan 17

A Local Agency Success Georgia: Douglas County Curve Safety Action Plan 17

Noteworthy Programs/Projects • Illinois: Signal clearance interval project from MPO • New Jersey: MPO

Noteworthy Programs/Projects • Illinois: Signal clearance interval project from MPO • New Jersey: MPO Involvement • Minnesota: Township Sign Inventory and Replacement Pilot Program 18

Noteworthy Programs/Projects • Minnesota: Road Safety Plan (RSP) Program • Washington: Corridor Safety Program

Noteworthy Programs/Projects • Minnesota: Road Safety Plan (RSP) Program • Washington: Corridor Safety Program • Michigan: Local Safety Initiative (LSI) 19

QUESTIONS? 20

QUESTIONS? 20

Contact Information Rosemarie Anderson Rosemarie. anderson@dot. gov 202 -366 -5007 21

Contact Information Rosemarie Anderson Rosemarie. anderson@dot. gov 202 -366 -5007 21