Linac Test Area Instrumentation Update M Haney D

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Linac Test Area Instrumentation Update M. Haney, D. Errede, Z. Conway University of Illinois

Linac Test Area Instrumentation Update M. Haney, D. Errede, Z. Conway University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al.

Instrumentation • Need safe solution for instrumenting the LH 2 absorber in the LTA

Instrumentation • Need safe solution for instrumenting the LH 2 absorber in the LTA • Prudent to accommodate MICE and European safety considerations – i. e. do it right the first time… 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 2

Primary Objective - Safety • Intrinsic safety, if possible – Less than 1 watt

Primary Objective - Safety • Intrinsic safety, if possible – Less than 1 watt (per channel? ) – Good idea for Fermi; required for Europe • Gas-purged enclosure, if necessary – 19” rack, 40 U tall 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 3

Signals inside (the cryostat) • 12 (cryo) temperatures – readout via GPIB + Lab.

Signals inside (the cryostat) • 12 (cryo) temperatures – readout via GPIB + Lab. View (PC) • 25(ish) 4 -wire bolometry strips • Multiple fibers – FISO strain gages – Laser occlusion? – Simple spark detectors • (light pipe to photodiode) 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 4

(more) Signals inside • USB (4 wires, and shield) for CCD camera – via

(more) Signals inside • USB (4 wires, and shield) for CCD camera – via PC • Piezo vibration sensor – via (16 chan/12 bit) ADC and Lab. View (PC) • Local (64 chan/16 bit) IRM channels – via “Lab. View” (see last slide) • MICE channels (? ) – placeholder for the future… 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 5

Signals outside • Many voltages, currents, temperatures, pressures – magnets, beam position monitors, etc.

Signals outside • Many voltages, currents, temperatures, pressures – magnets, beam position monitors, etc. • Most available from ACNET or local IRM – via “Lab. View” (see last slide) • or Cyro-PLC – and Intellution 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 6

Two Possibilities (1) • Intrinsically safe Hazard Safe Sealed Conduit(s) Barrier(s) IRM ACNET Cryo(temp)

Two Possibilities (1) • Intrinsically safe Hazard Safe Sealed Conduit(s) Barrier(s) IRM ACNET Cryo(temp) FISO PC w/32 chan ADC Intrinsically safe signal conditioners and transmitters 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. UPS network power 7

Two Possibilities (2) • Gas-purged box Hazard Safe Barrier(s) Sealed Conduit(s) ACNET IRM Cryo(temp)

Two Possibilities (2) • Gas-purged box Hazard Safe Barrier(s) Sealed Conduit(s) ACNET IRM Cryo(temp) FISO PC w/32 chan ADC power UPS 14 June 2002 network m. haney, et al. 8

(basic) Barrier fuse Power + Signal “safe circuit” Return Ground 14 June 2002 m.

(basic) Barrier fuse Power + Signal “safe circuit” Return Ground 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 9

This Summer – Z. Conway • Lab. View interface – GPIB – ADC –

This Summer – Z. Conway • Lab. View interface – GPIB – ADC – IRM 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 10

Open Issues • Local signal condition vs Purged box – Common mode concerns (noise

Open Issues • Local signal condition vs Purged box – Common mode concerns (noise from magnets) • Especially surge currents on start/stop – Long wires! • 2 -wire vs 4 -wire solutions – Shielding and noise sensitivity in general – Cable plant size concern • (already 200+ wires, not including shielding) 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 11

Open Issues (2) • Lab. View vs C – to read ACNET data (mostly,

Open Issues (2) • Lab. View vs C – to read ACNET data (mostly, IRMs outside of the experiment) • Remote control of PC – Citrix ICA, PCAny. Where, etc. – Lab. View web-remote instrumentation – KVM? 14 June 2002 m. haney, et al. 12