Like concepts repel unlike 1 concepts attract Pasks

Like concepts repel unlike 1 concepts attract Pask’s “Last Theorem” For ALL forces: Gravitational, Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong nuclear force Or “just a force” as Pask described it. Applicability to electromagnetism seems trivial but not gravitational.

Pask concept definition Any circular persisting process in any medium • Solid • Liquid • Gas • Plasma A Spin exerting a parity, like or unlike, clockwise or anticlockwise for a given observer in a given context and perspective. System boundary problem. Surface interactions. The sewage Farm

The Proof outlined • Consider the parallel axis spin case (Wiener’s stable parallel self organisation case for the “attraction of frequencies”) • Gravitational case • A car stationary at the earths equator (weighs less than at a pole). • [In general a Coriolis or geostrophic force will also be exerted (off the equator) for any movement on an orbiting body. This is a natural manifestation of Pask’s third closure force of the Borromean triple. ]

The car moves • Ignoring Coriolis effects • To the West spins add and car is lighter because of increased centrifugal force • To the East spins subtract and the car is heavier because of decreased centrifugal force • Like spin or angular momentum repels • Unlike spin or angular momentum attracts

Spin Theorem Gravitational case Calculate the centrifugal force on the car EARTH CAR Like spins Car lighter Like spins repel EARTH CAR One spin Car on equator CAR Unlike spins Car heavier Unlike spins attract

Bohr Model Electrostatic Attraction Case Ks>>Ko Orbital spin Very low Electron Spin Very high Proton Gravitational attraction only No electrostatic forces only attracting and repelling spin forces Coupling the unlike antiparallel spins effectively increases the Newtonian Gravitational constant by 1040

The quantum Bohr model • Assume gravitational attraction and no electrostatic forces. Bohr radius huge. • Using ionization energy of hydrogen atom find spin kinetic energy of electron. • Spin the electron opposite to the proton spin apply the unlike spins rule and the correct Bohr radius is produced

Laithwaite’s Conical Pendulum The quantum as a precession phenomenon? Spin Unlike spin Like spin

Using Angular Momentum we unify a dynamical treatment of electromagnetic and gravitational forces • • No magnetic fields, North South poles etc No electrostatic fields, positive negative charges Just instantaneous conservation of angular momentum No more Forces just angular momentum to account for action at a distance and instantaneous gravitational attraction as seemed implicit in Whitehead’s “Process and Reality”. • Since weak and strong nuclear forces involve transfer of momentum as per QED/QCD a similar treatment may be assumed applicable • Einstein’s dream realised?

Anthony Osborne and Viv Pope • “An Angular Momentum Synthesis of ‘Gravitational’ and ‘Electrostatic’ Forces” Galilean Electrodynamics, Vol 14, Special Issue 1, Spring 2003, pp. 9 - 19 • http: //www. poams. org/lib/pub_an_ang ular_momentum_synthesis. pdf • POAMS: 'Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis' • Members of the ANPA Group

Coupling: General case Where J is total angular momentum L is orbital and S is spin angular momentum φ is the angle between L and S, the coupling When Φ= π/2 coupling is serial and weak or decoherent. (Cf Wiener “attraction and repulsion of frequencies”)

Like spins • • • The relativistic condition There are no doppelgangers Likeness, faith and duration Recursive packing: telephone cable Unfoldment- thought

Like concepts repelling: a thought. Indeterminacies (or uncertainties? ) a. Of foci of, thought or attention, from which to unfold. b. Truncation and selection of unfoldment, given its origin Repulsion of two recursively concepts after observation or interaction unfolding for time, T An entailment structure in a void/not void space Fourier decomposition operates. Pask never nominated a fundamental frequency. Enter the Planck frequency? Participant (A) Participant (B) A medium eg a star or a brain Distinction develops as interaction persists. The Faith to produce a product. “in the rigorous sense of an iterative refinement of meaning. ” IAT para 197

What’s all this Brunnian stuff? The removal of any component leaves a set of trivial unlinked unknots The Borromean Link fills three dimensional space. This suggests three axes for coherent entanglement Quantum entanglement and topological entanglement, Kaufmann and Lomonaco (2002) http: //www. iop. org/EJ/article/13672630/4/1/373/nj 2173. html

How is three dimensional space filled? The three repulsive forces of a minimal hard carapace. The minimal mechanical requirement for existence. The Snelson/Fuller prismatic tensegrity or octet truss Symmetry: mirror image enantiamorphic pairs P Mc. Guinness, et al "The optimal tap: three-dimensional nozzle design" (J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 (2005) 3382– 3386) – Triangular nozzles produce smaller droplets than circular. http: //www. iop. org/EJ/article/0022 -3727/38/18/009/d 5_18_009. pdf

The Pask Forces Diagram The Carapace of Repulsive Force around a section of a closed loop concept process from Pask 1993 The repulsive – carapace- force is signed with screw symmetry due to packed braids which are not perspective dependent (unlike spin). Axioms from Interactions of Actors Theory Kybernetes: Vol. 33 No. 9/10, 2004,

Synchronisation Both in phase and out of phase. Baker and Blackburn in “The Pendulum” OUP 2005 conclude Weak driving with strong coupling=> synchronisation or coherence Strong driving with weak coupling=> unsynchronisation or decoherence

“There are no doppelgangers” Pask and Relativistic Compliance • Consider a pair of hydrogen atoms as counters or clocks. • Acceleration histories of the two atoms will never be the same- even if frozen as water ice. • Time dilatation and relativistic mass or energy considerations will show at some level of precision the atomic spectra of the atoms will be different. • While coherent as eg dihydrogen their clocks will synchronise but their phase history will remain different (Thanks Tony) and the counts distinct. • Two observers (or actors) may share a context but their different perspectives guarantees the no doppelgangers theorem. • Best and worst case differences can be quantified.

Time is Incommensurable for Actors • The Lambda matrix for actors • A matrix of matrices or a matrix of vectors? • Certainly a list of interactions for all Actor Interactions. • Thus x, t(j)), B(y, t(k))) represents an interaction between Actors A and B at time at actor A's time t(j). • De Zeeuw argues the vector t(n) should be matrix. • This requires all concurrent events to be coherent. An interaction produces decoherence. We ponder.

Conjecture • A given coherent set or persisting object exerts a net parity • Coupling constants deriving from decoherence produce magnitudes

The unobserved and the elementary: a new classification • Bogons and • Morons

• A Coriolis-like effect of the dynamical boson-fermion interaction in the interacting boson-fermion model. • Physics Letters B, vol. 199, no. 4, 31 Dec. 1987, pp. 482 -8. Netherlands. V. Paar (Univ. Zagreb)