Light Pulse Atom Interferometry for Precision Measurement Jaewan

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
Light Pulse Atom Interferometry for Precision Measurement Jaewan Kim Myongji University

Light Pulse Atom Interferometry for Precision Measurement Jaewan Kim Myongji University

AI for Precision Measurements • Inertial Sensing – Gravimeters, Gyroscopes, Gradiometers • Newton’s constant

AI for Precision Measurements • Inertial Sensing – Gravimeters, Gyroscopes, Gradiometers • Newton’s constant G • Fine-structure constant and h/M • Test of Relativity • Interferometers in space • …

Gravity Measurements Geophysics Gravity field mapping (crustal deformations, mass changes, definition of the geoid

Gravity Measurements Geophysics Gravity field mapping (crustal deformations, mass changes, definition of the geoid …) Navigation (submarine…) Tests of fundamental physics (equivalence principle, tests of gravitation …) Metrology: Watt Balance (new definition of the kg) g

Absolute Gravimeters Commercial Gravimeter : FG 5 Principle : Michelson interferometer with falling corner

Absolute Gravimeters Commercial Gravimeter : FG 5 Principle : Michelson interferometer with falling corner cube Accuracy : 2 µGal 1 µGal = 10 -8 m/s 2 ~ 10 -9 g Atomic gravimeter Stanford experiment in 2001 : – Resolution: 3 µGal after 1 minute – Accuracy: <3 µGal From A. Peters, K. Y. Chung and S. Chu

Principle of Atom Interferometry

Principle of Atom Interferometry

Stimulated Raman Transitions Coherent beam splitter 3 level atoms 87 Rb |5 P 3/2

Stimulated Raman Transitions Coherent beam splitter 3 level atoms 87 Rb |5 P 3/2 |i > 780 nm k 1 , 1 k 2 , 2 |F=2 = |b |5 S 1/2 ωatome |F=1 = |a Two photon transition couple |a and |b Key advantage of Raman transitions - State labelling - Detection of the internal states keff = k 1 -k 2 Mirror (p pulse) Beam splitter (p/2 pulse)

Analogy : Optical/Atomic Interferometry Optical Coherent splitting and recombination Atomic Two momentum states Two

Analogy : Optical/Atomic Interferometry Optical Coherent splitting and recombination Atomic Two momentum states Two complementary output ports Intensity modulation Atomic Interferometer analogous to Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Interferometer Phase Shift Laser phase gets imprinted b a +F b a -F

Interferometer Phase Shift Laser phase gets imprinted b a +F b a -F

Case of an Acceleration DF = F 1(t 1) – 2 F 2 (t

Case of an Acceleration DF = F 1(t 1) – 2 F 2 (t 2) + F 3 (t 3) =

Implementation of Raman Laser • Vertical Raman lasers Laser 1 • Retroreflect two (copropagating)

Implementation of Raman Laser • Vertical Raman lasers Laser 1 • Retroreflect two (copropagating) Raman lasers Pulse 1 Reduces influence of path fluctuations (common mode) Þ 4 laser beams Þ 2 pairs of counterpropragating Raman lasers with opposite keff wavevectors Pulse 2 • Position of planes of equal phase difference attached to position of retroreflecting mirror Pulse 3 Laser 2 Miroir Interferometer measurement = relative displacement atoms/mirror

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of the Raman transition • Ramping of the frequency difference to stay on resonance : π/2 π π /2 C~45%

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of the Raman transition • Ramping of the frequency difference to stay on resonance : π/2 π π /2 C~45%

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of the Raman transition • Ramping of the frequency difference to stay on resonance : π/2 π π /2 C~45%

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of

Principle of Measurements • Free fall → Doppler shift of the resonance condition of the Raman transition • Ramping of the frequency difference to stay on resonance : π/2 π π /2 C~45% • Dark fringe : independent of T

Experiments

Experiments

Experimental Setup 2 nd generation vacuum chamber • Titanium vacuum chamber (non magnetic) •

Experimental Setup 2 nd generation vacuum chamber • Titanium vacuum chamber (non magnetic) • 14 + 2 + 4 viewports • Indium seals • Pumps : 2 × getter pumps 50 l/s 1 × ion pump 2 l/s 4 × getter pills • Two layers magnetic shield • Retroreflecting mirror under vacuum

Experimental Setup

Experimental Setup

Experimental Setup Commercial fiber splitters Fibered angled MOT collimators Symmetric detection Passive isolation platform

Experimental Setup Commercial fiber splitters Fibered angled MOT collimators Symmetric detection Passive isolation platform Baking 2~3 months at 120 °C

Optical Bench Compact : 60 by 90 cm 3 ECDL, 2 TA Key feature

Optical Bench Compact : 60 by 90 cm 3 ECDL, 2 TA Key feature : Use the same lasers for Cooling and Raman beams

Noise Parameters 2 T=100 ms t = 6 µs s v ~ vr Ndet

Noise Parameters 2 T=100 ms t = 6 µs s v ~ vr Ndet = 106 Tc = 250 ms Contrast ~ 45 % SNR = 25 σΦ = 1/SNR = 40 mrad/shot sg/g = 10 -7 /shot Sources of noise - laser phase noise - mirror vibrations - detection noise

Influence of Laser Phase Noise 2 T=100 ms Source L a s er s

Influence of Laser Phase Noise 2 T=100 ms Source L a s er s σg σΦ (mrad/shot) (g/Hz 1/2) 100 MHz reference 1, 0 1, 3· 10 -9 Synthesis HF 0, 7 0, 9· 10 -9 PLL 1, 6 2, 0· 10 -9 Optical fiber 1, 0 1, 3· 10 -9 Retroreflection 2, 0 2, 6· 10 -9 Total 3, 1 3, 9· 10 -9 Negligible with respect to observed interferometer noise

Vibration Noise Measurement of the vibration noise with a very low noise seismometer (Guralp

Vibration Noise Measurement of the vibration noise with a very low noise seismometer (Guralp T 40) @ 1 s : 2, 9 · 10 -6 g ; 1, 4 · 10 -6 g ; 7, 6 · 10 -8 g OFF (day) OFF (night) ON (day)

Correlation : Gravimeter - Seismometer Us(t) velocity signal => Expected phase shift Platform on

Correlation : Gravimeter - Seismometer Us(t) velocity signal => Expected phase shift Platform on Platform Off Þ Use the seismometer to correct the interferometer phase

Vibration Correction Seismometer PC keffg. T² Post correction v(t) → fvib. S Interferometer keffg.

Vibration Correction Seismometer PC keffg. T² Post correction v(t) → fvib. S Interferometer keffg. T² + fvib. S Typical sensitivity Without correction (day) : 8 10 -8 g @ 1 s With correction (night) : 5 10 -8 g @ 1 s With correction : 2 -3 10 -8 g @ 1 s → Gain ~ 3 Best result Night – Air conditioning OFF With correction : 1. 4 10 -8 g @ 1 s

Long Term Measurements 4 continuous days in April 2010 reveal earth tides

Long Term Measurements 4 continuous days in April 2010 reveal earth tides

Long-Term Stability Allan standard deviation of tide-corrected gravity data 4 10 -10 g Long

Long-Term Stability Allan standard deviation of tide-corrected gravity data 4 10 -10 g Long term stability comparable to the accuracy of the tide model

Wavefront Aberrations Wavefronts are not flat : gaussian beams, flatness of the optics …

Wavefront Aberrations Wavefronts are not flat : gaussian beams, flatness of the optics … Case of a curvature → δφ = K. r 2 (with K = k 1/2 R) Δg < 10 -9 g with T = 2 µK R > 10 km ! → flatness better than λ/300 !!! Measure aberrations with wavefront sensor + excellent optics + colder atoms

Characterization of Optics Mirror • 40 mm diameter • PV= l/10 • RMS =l/100

Characterization of Optics Mirror • 40 mm diameter • PV= l/10 • RMS =l/100 Simulation : • T = 2. 5 m. K • s = 1. 5 mm g/g = 1. 4 10 -9 PV l/4 g/g = 8 10 -9

Compact Atomic Gravimeter Principal demonstrations of key elements done ➡ New prototype under realization

Compact Atomic Gravimeter Principal demonstrations of key elements done ➡ New prototype under realization (automne 2010) ➡ High repetition rate (4 Hz) ➡ Expected performances: 50 µGal/√Hz Transportable device: field applications ➡ sensor head: -Few dm 3 -no mechanical moving part -Magnetic shield Pyramidal reflector (2 X 2 cm 2) 30 cm Laser and electronic ensemble: 19 inches/12 U

Conclusion CAG Laboratory experiment – (for Watt Balance project) Aimed at ultimate accuracy <10

Conclusion CAG Laboratory experiment – (for Watt Balance project) Aimed at ultimate accuracy <10 -9 g Need for ultra cold atoms Towards on-field sensors Technology is now mature Þ Transfer to industry First step : Miniatom Soon on the market? l New schemes Trapped geometries : optical lattices, atom chips ? Further reduction in the size l New applications Geophysics, fundamental physics (tests of EP, space missions …)