Light field microscopy Marc Levoy Ren Ng Andrew

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
Light field microscopy Marc Levoy, Ren Ng, Andrew Adams Matthew Footer, Mark Horowitz Stanford

Light field microscopy Marc Levoy, Ren Ng, Andrew Adams Matthew Footer, Mark Horowitz Stanford Computer Graphics Laboratory

Executive summary • captures the 4 D light field inside a microscope • yields

Executive summary • captures the 4 D light field inside a microscope • yields perspective flyarounds and focal stacks from a single snapshot, but at lower spatial resolution • focal stack → deconvolution microscopy → volume data Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Devices for recording light fields (using geometrical optics) big scenes small scenes • •

Devices for recording light fields (using geometrical optics) big scenes small scenes • • • handheld camera gantry array of cameras plenoptic camera light field microscope [Buehler 2001] [Stanford 2002] [Wilburn 2005] [Ng 2005] (this paper) Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Light fields at micron scales • wave optics must be considered – diffraction limits

Light fields at micron scales • wave optics must be considered – diffraction limits the spatial × angular resolution • most objects are no longer opaque – each pixel is a line integral through the object » of attenuation » or emission – can reconstruct 3 D structure from these integrals » tomography » 3 D deconvolution Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conventional versus plenoptic camera Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conventional versus plenoptic camera Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conventional versus plenoptic camera 125μ square-sided microlenses uv-plane st-plane Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conventional versus plenoptic camera 125μ square-sided microlenses uv-plane st-plane Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Digital refocusing Σ Σ • refocusing = summing windows extracted from several microlenses Ó

Digital refocusing Σ Σ • refocusing = summing windows extracted from several microlenses Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Example of digital refocusing Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Example of digital refocusing Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Refocusing portraits Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Refocusing portraits Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Macrophotography Ó 2005 Marc Levoy

Macrophotography Ó 2005 Marc Levoy

Digitally moving the observer Σ Σ • moving the observer = moving the window

Digitally moving the observer Σ Σ • moving the observer = moving the window we extract from the microlenses Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Example of moving the observer Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Example of moving the observer Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Moving backward and forward Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Moving backward and forward Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

A light field microscope (LFM) eyepiece intermediate image plane objective specimen Ó 2006 Marc

A light field microscope (LFM) eyepiece intermediate image plane objective specimen Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

A light field microscope (LFM) sensor eyepiece intermediate image plane objective specimen → reduced

A light field microscope (LFM) sensor eyepiece intermediate image plane objective specimen → reduced lateral resolution on specimen = 0. 26μ × 12 spots = 3. 1μ • 40 x / 0. 95 NA objective ↓ 0. 26μ spot on specimen × 40 x = 10. 4μ on sensor ↓ 2400 spots over 25 mm field • 1252 -micron microlenses ↓ 200 × 200 microlenses with 12 × 12 spots per microlens Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

A light field microscope (LFM) sensor 2. 5 mm 160 mm 0. 2 mm

A light field microscope (LFM) sensor 2. 5 mm 160 mm 0. 2 mm Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Example light field micrograph • • • orange fluorescent crayon mercury-arc source + blue

Example light field micrograph • • • orange fluorescent crayon mercury-arc source + blue dichroic filter 16 x / 0. 5 NA (dry) objective f/20 microlens array 65 mm f/2. 8 macro lens at 1: 1 Canon 20 D digital camera 200μ ordinary microscope light field microscope Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

The geometry of the light field in a microscope • microscopes make orthographic views

The geometry of the light field in a microscope • microscopes make orthographic views • translating the stage in X or Y provides no parallax on the specimen f • out-of-plane features don’t shift position when they come into focus objective lenses are telecentric Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Panning and focusing panning sequence focal stack Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Panning and focusing panning sequence focal stack Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Mouse embryo lung (16 x / 0. 5 NA water immersion) 200μ light field

Mouse embryo lung (16 x / 0. 5 NA water immersion) 200μ light field pan focal stack Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Axial resolution (a. k. a. depth of field) • wave term + geometrical optics

Axial resolution (a. k. a. depth of field) • wave term + geometrical optics term • ordinary microscope (16 x/0. 4 NA (dry), e = 0) (wave optics dominates) • with microlens array (e = 125μ) (geometrical optics dominates) • stopped down to one pixel per microlens → number of slices in focal stack = 12 Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

3 D reconstruction • confocal scanning [Minsky 1957] • shape-from-focus [Nayar 1990] • deconvolution

3 D reconstruction • confocal scanning [Minsky 1957] • shape-from-focus [Nayar 1990] • deconvolution microscopy [Agard 1984] – 4 D light field → digital refocusing → 3 D focal stack → deconvolution microscopy → 3 D volume data (UMIC SUNY/Stonybrook) (Noguchi) (Delta. Vision) Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

3 D deconvolution [Mc. Nally 1999] focus stack of a point in 3 -space

3 D deconvolution [Mc. Nally 1999] focus stack of a point in 3 -space is the 3 D PSF of that imaging system • • • object * PSF → focus stack {object} × {PSF} → {focus stack} {PSF} → {object} spectrum contains zeros, due to missing rays imaging noise is amplified by division by ~zeros reduce by regularization, e. g. smoothing {PSF} Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Silkworm mouth (40 x / 1. 3 NA oil immersion) 100μ slice of focal

Silkworm mouth (40 x / 1. 3 NA oil immersion) 100μ slice of focal stack slice of volume rendering Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Insect legs (16 x / 0. 4 NA dry) 200μ volume rendering all-focus image

Insect legs (16 x / 0. 4 NA dry) 200μ volume rendering all-focus image [Agarwala 2004] Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

3 D reconstruction (revisited) • 4 D light field → digital refocusing → 3

3 D reconstruction (revisited) • 4 D light field → digital refocusing → 3 D focal stack → deconvolution microscopy → 3 D volume data (Delta. Vision) • 4 D light field → tomographic reconstruction → 3 D volume data (from Kak & Slaney) Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Implications of this equivalence • light fields of minimally scattering volumes contain only 3

Implications of this equivalence • light fields of minimally scattering volumes contain only 3 D worth of information, not 4 D • the extra dimension serves to reduce noise, but could be re-purposed? Optical Projection Tomography [Sharpe 2002] Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conclusions • captures 3 D structure of microscopic objects in a single snapshot, and

Conclusions • captures 3 D structure of microscopic objects in a single snapshot, and at a single instant in time Calcium fluorescent imaging of zebrafish larvae optic tectum during changing visual stimula Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Conclusions • captures 3 D structure of microscopic objects in a single snapshot, and

Conclusions • captures 3 D structure of microscopic objects in a single snapshot, and at a single instant in time but. . . • sacrifices spatial resolution to obtain control over viewpoint and focus • 3 D reconstruction fails if specimen is too thick or too opaque Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Future work • extending the field of view by correcting digitally for objective aberrations

Future work • extending the field of view by correcting digitally for objective aberrations Nikon 40 x 0. 95 NA (dry) Plan-Apo Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

Future work • extending the field of view by correcting digitally for objective aberrations

Future work • extending the field of view by correcting digitally for objective aberrations • microlenses in the illumination path → an imaging microscope scatterometer 200μ angular dependence of reflection from single squid iridophore Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

http: //graphics. stanford. edu/projects/lfmicroscope Ó 2006 Marc Levoy

http: //graphics. stanford. edu/projects/lfmicroscope Ó 2006 Marc Levoy