Lexical Affect Sensing Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect? Alexander Osherenko, Elisabeth André

Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect? Alexander Osherenko, Elisabeth André University of Augsburg

What emotions convey these textual utterances (SAL corpus)? 1. High arousal, negative valence: No,

What emotions convey these textual utterances (SAL corpus)? 1. High arousal, negative valence: No, well, I'm not a fool. 2. High arousal, positive valence: No, <laugh> I think I'm being stupid actually. 3. Low arousal, positive valence: Yup.

Dictionaries 1. Dictionary of Affect Language (DAL - Whissell) „happy” (evaluation, activation, imagery) 3.

Dictionaries 1. Dictionary of Affect Language (DAL - Whissell) „happy” (evaluation, activation, imagery) 3. 0000 2. 7500 2. 2 2. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Dictionary (LIWC) „happy” (categories) Affect, Positive emotion, Positive feeling 3. BNC frequency list 11649 happy aj 0 4. SAL frequency list

Research questions • • Are recognition rates higher if word features are emotional? Do

Research questions • • Are recognition rates higher if word features are emotional? Do emotive annotations in affect dictionaries improve recognition? Are common words more useful than less common words? Are dictionaries of affect more useful than generalpurpose dictionaries?

Feature Extraction and Evaluation 1. Word features – Selection of the most expressive words

Feature Extraction and Evaluation 1. Word features – Selection of the most expressive words – Selection of the most frequent features 2. LIWC features (CAT-68 and CAT-8) 3. DAL features (EA-AVG) – Average values for the evaluation, activation, imagery scores

Evaluation • 672 utterances from the SAL corpus as a 5 classes-problem • The

Evaluation • 672 utterances from the SAL corpus as a 5 classes-problem • The majority vote strategy • The SVM classifier • Averaged recall value/number of word features

Useful criterion of feature reduction without risking a severe degradation of recognition rates

Useful criterion of feature reduction without risking a severe degradation of recognition rates

Do emotive annotations in affect dictionaries improve recognition? Affect-related features do not include discriminative

Do emotive annotations in affect dictionaries improve recognition? Affect-related features do not include discriminative information that is not yet included in the word counts

Hard to say whether a reduction of features should be based rather on the

Hard to say whether a reduction of features should be based rather on the frequency of words or their expressive qualities

General-purpose dictionaries may provide similar results as affect dictionaries for similar numbers of features

General-purpose dictionaries may provide similar results as affect dictionaries for similar numbers of features

Recommendations • Frequency strategy is not worse than the emotional expressivity strategy – Similar

Recommendations • Frequency strategy is not worse than the emotional expressivity strategy – Similar trends for a movie reviews’ corpus • Results don‘t degrade dramatically when reducting number of word features (real-time recognition) – Acceptable results also with only affect annotations

Thank you!

Thank you!

Conclusion

Conclusion

Mapping of FEELTRACE data onto affect segments 1. 0 high_neg Activation high_pos 0. 2

Mapping of FEELTRACE data onto affect segments 1. 0 high_neg Activation high_pos 0. 2 neutral Evaluation 1. 0 low_neg low_pos • Examples: – [Affect segment: high_pos] (Laugh) I'm damn awful. How are you (laugh)? – [Affect segment: low_neg] Erm, that's probably true.