Lees Ferry Fish Monitoring Lees Ferry Monitoring How

  • Slides: 40
Download presentation
Lees Ferry Fish Monitoring

Lees Ferry Fish Monitoring

Lees Ferry Monitoring • How do Glen Canyon Dam operations influence the rainbow trout

Lees Ferry Monitoring • How do Glen Canyon Dam operations influence the rainbow trout fishery? • Annual sampling • Electrofishing • Abundance, Size • Angler Surveys • Catch rates

Mean peak discharge = 18, 823 ± 2, 518 cfs Mean discharge = 12,

Mean peak discharge = 18, 823 ± 2, 518 cfs Mean discharge = 12, 816 ± 683 cfs Modified low fluctuating flows 1991 -2010

1996 -HFE Max-45, 600 cfs Mean-15, 235 ± 529 cfs

1996 -HFE Max-45, 600 cfs Mean-15, 235 ± 529 cfs

2000 -LSSF Max-30, 900 cfs Mean- 8, 355 ± 22. 4 cfs

2000 -LSSF Max-30, 900 cfs Mean- 8, 355 ± 22. 4 cfs

2003 -TSF

2003 -TSF

2004 -TSF

2004 -TSF

2004 -HFE Max-41, 900 cfs Mean- 11, 789 ± 395 cfs

2004 -HFE Max-41, 900 cfs Mean- 11, 789 ± 395 cfs

2005 -TSF

2005 -TSF

2008 -HFE Max-42, 500 cfs Mean- 12, 830 ± 326 cfs

2008 -HFE Max-42, 500 cfs Mean- 12, 830 ± 326 cfs

2011 -Eq. F Max-26, 200 cfs 2011 Mean- 19, 326 ± 380 cfs May-Aug

2011 -Eq. F Max-26, 200 cfs 2011 Mean- 19, 326 ± 380 cfs May-Aug Mean-24, 280 ± 257 cfs

 • 1991 -2010 - 3. 1 ± 0. 52 fish/min • 2011 –

• 1991 -2010 - 3. 1 ± 0. 52 fish/min • 2011 – 6. 9 ± 1. 35 fish/min 2000 LSSF 1996 HFE 2003 -2005 TSF 2004 HFE 2011 Eq. F 2008 HFE

Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring Juveniles

Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring Juveniles

306 -405 Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring 306 -405 mm

306 -405 Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring 306 -405 mm

Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring >405 mm

Lees Ferry Standardized Monitoring >405 mm

2008 -HFE 2011 -Eq. F

2008 -HFE 2011 -Eq. F

Rainbow trout <152 mm 2008 HFE 2011 EQ

Rainbow trout <152 mm 2008 HFE 2011 EQ

Rainbow trout <152 mm 2008 HFE 2008 Cohort 2011 EQ

Rainbow trout <152 mm 2008 HFE 2008 Cohort 2011 EQ

Average total length by year

Average total length by year

Lees Ferry Creel 1991 -2011

Lees Ferry Creel 1991 -2011

Low Angler Catch Rate High Angler Catch Rate 0. 4 fish/hr 1. 4 fish/hr

Low Angler Catch Rate High Angler Catch Rate 0. 4 fish/hr 1. 4 fish/hr 0. 6 fish/hr 1. 5 fish/hr

Additional species captured during sampling Total Captured Native Species Flannelmouth sucker Bluehead sucker Speckled

Additional species captured during sampling Total Captured Native Species Flannelmouth sucker Bluehead sucker Speckled dace 334 4 1 Brown trout Brook trout 43 12 Common carp Walleye Channel catfish Green sunfish Striped bass Smallmouth Bass Red shiner 180 12 5 3 2 2 1 Cold-water Nonnative Warm-water Nonnative

Native Fish in the Tailwater to Glen Canyon Dam

Native Fish in the Tailwater to Glen Canyon Dam

Mainstem Fish Monitoring

Mainstem Fish Monitoring

Rainbow trout

Rainbow trout

Rainbow trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Rainbow trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Rainbow trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Rainbow trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Rainbow trout 6 -fold decrease in CPUE from RM 58 63 GCD

Rainbow trout 6 -fold decrease in CPUE from RM 58 63 GCD

Brown trout

Brown trout

Brown trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Brown trout 2000 -2011 GCD

Common carp

Common carp

Common carp 2000 -2011 GCD

Common carp 2000 -2011 GCD

Flannelmouth Sucker

Flannelmouth Sucker

Flannelmouth Sucker 2000 -2011 GCD

Flannelmouth Sucker 2000 -2011 GCD

Bluehead Sucker

Bluehead Sucker

Bluehead Sucker GCD

Bluehead Sucker GCD

Fish Management? • Vision – DFC… Desired Future Conditions – ORV… Outstanding and Remarkable

Fish Management? • Vision – DFC… Desired Future Conditions – ORV… Outstanding and Remarkable Values • Compromise – Do you want big fish or a lot of fish? – Fish are not the only resource being managed for downstream of GCD • Feasibility – Fiscal – Legal – Logistical – Political

Fish Management? • Implementation (a few tools) – Add fish • Translocation • Augmentation

Fish Management? • Implementation (a few tools) – Add fish • Translocation • Augmentation • Stocking – Remove Fish • Mechanical Removal • Chemical Removal • Change in regulations – Habitat manipulation • Advantageous or disadvantageous for certain species – Flows – Temperature – Sediment – Food base • Feasibility

Fish Management? • • • Uncertainty/Patience – Adaptive management • Utilize best available information

Fish Management? • • • Uncertainty/Patience – Adaptive management • Utilize best available information to design experiments to drive resource towards desired condition • Experiment • Monitor resource/resources • Analyze data and compare current resource/resources to that of desired condition • Go back to step 1 as necessary to reach desired conditions • Continue to monitor Feasibility Public Outreach – Throughout the process