LECTURE 4 SOME INTUITIONS emoti on al processes

  • Slides: 24
Download presentation
LECTURE 4

LECTURE 4

SOME INTUITIONS emoti on al processes underlie rapid, basic, a nd automatic evalu at

SOME INTUITIONS emoti on al processes underlie rapid, basic, a nd automatic evalu at ions low- l eve l proc esses that elicit st ron g valenced and stereot yped beh avio ral responses re fle ct a spee d/accuracy tr adeoff whe reb y b ehavioral options are evaluat ed only with sufficient re solutio n to b ias behavior in a gene rally a daptive manner, often desc rib ed as a crude biasing signal or a h euristic (JDM). In cogn itive processes are regarded as i nte gra ting information re ga rd ing the dimensions of risky cho ice s according to some expec ta tio n-b ased calculus, or costben ef it a na lysis & are typically re ga rd ed to involve controlled proce sses a nd are sequential and rule -ba sed

BECHARA Most theories of choice assume that decisions derive from an assessment of the

BECHARA Most theories of choice assume that decisions derive from an assessment of the future outcomes of various options and alternatives through some type of cost-benefit analyses. The influence of emotions on decision-making is largely ignored. The studies of decision-making in neurological patients who can no longer process emotional information normally suggest that people make judgments not only by evaluating the consequences and their probability of occurring, but also and even sometimes primarily at a gut or emotional level.

OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS what specific parameters of decision contexts are encoded by the brain? how

OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS what specific parameters of decision contexts are encoded by the brain? how are these parameters represented and processed at the neural level? To what extent do such representations correspond to the parameters of decision-making frameworks? What is the relationship between these representations and cognitive and emotional processes?

DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY Minimal parameters: a basic tradeoff between expected reward and risk

DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY Minimal parameters: a basic tradeoff between expected reward and risk § Choosing between putting money into a savings account or the stock market Expected utility (risk is implicit) vs. financial decision theory

UNCERTAINTY PARAMETERS

UNCERTAINTY PARAMETERS

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

NEURAL CORRELATES OF EXPECTED REWARD

NEURAL CORRELATES OF EXPECTED REWARD

NEURAL CORRELATES OF RISK

NEURAL CORRELATES OF RISK

CONCLUSIONS, PART 1 the brain decomposes risky choice contexts along the statistical dimensions that

CONCLUSIONS, PART 1 the brain decomposes risky choice contexts along the statistical dimensions that are the cornerstone of financial decision theory, a paradigmatic cost-benefit and cognitive computation However, these are paradigmatic emotion/affective regions (including insula) At the level of reward/risk perception, no need for speed/accuracy tradeoff

ETHICS AND THE BATTLE BETWEEN EMOTION AND REASON

ETHICS AND THE BATTLE BETWEEN EMOTION AND REASON

MORAL DECISION MAKING Emotion – reason distinction central to classical and contemporary debates §

MORAL DECISION MAKING Emotion – reason distinction central to classical and contemporary debates § Kant (cognitivism) vs. Hume (moral sentimentalism) § Kohlberg ‘s cognitivist moral developmental psychology (moral reasoning) vs. Gilligan § Contemporary moral intuitionism (Haidt)

HAIDT’S SOCIAL INTUITIONISM Julie & Mark Family Dog 4 reasons to doubt the causal

HAIDT’S SOCIAL INTUITIONISM Julie & Mark Family Dog 4 reasons to doubt the causal importance of reason § § Dual process problem Motivated reasoning problem Post hoc problem (objective reasoning a cognitive illusion) The action problem

DUAL SYSTEMS

DUAL SYSTEMS

ETHICAL POSITIONS Consequentialism Mill's utilitarianism An action is right if it promotes the best

ETHICAL POSITIONS Consequentialism Mill's utilitarianism An action is right if it promotes the best consequences. Deontology Virtue Theory example Kantian ethics Aristotle's moral theory An action is right if it is in An action is right if it is what a abstract accordance with a moral rule virtuous agent would do in the description or principle. circumstances. A virtuous agent is one who acts virtuously, that is, one who has The best consequences more concrete A moral rule is one that is and exercises the virtues. A virtue are those in which specification required by rationality. happiness is maximized. is a character trait a human being needs to flourish or live well.

JOHN STUART MILL

JOHN STUART MILL

GREENE

GREENE

MORAL PHILOSOPHY Scenarios that probe moral intuition. § § Much used in moral philosophy

MORAL PHILOSOPHY Scenarios that probe moral intuition. § § Much used in moral philosophy One of the most famous is the “trolley” dilemma A runaway trolley is about to kill 5 people a) Push lever to change track -- kill 1 to save 5. b) Push man down foot bridge -- kill 1 to save 5. Deontological (emotion) /utilitarian (reason)

FOOTBRIDGE/SWITCH

FOOTBRIDGE/SWITCH

DIFFICULT VS EASY PERSONAL DILEMMA

DIFFICULT VS EASY PERSONAL DILEMMA

STROOP

STROOP

STROOP

STROOP

STROOP

STROOP

UTILITARIAN VS NON-UTILITARIAN

UTILITARIAN VS NON-UTILITARIAN