LECTURE 26 VIRTUE Utilitarianism Kantianism Investigates the moral

LECTURE 26: VIRTUE

Utilitarianism & Kantianism Investigates the moral value of actions Attempt to derive rules to distinguish between moral and immoral actions Provide guides for how an agent should conform their actions ETHICS Virtue Ethics Investigates the character or person of an agent Attempts to discover what makes a person good Focuses on which character traits are good

PLATO’S PROBLEM: THE IMMORALISTS

In Plato’s Republic Socrates asks, what is justice? Why should I be moral? Thrasymachus responds: 1. “Justice is the advantage of the stronger” Justice/injustice is defined by rules and laws created and enforced by the strongest in society to suit themselves This is a version of legal positivism Three things to note: a) Thrasymachus provides a rule, not examples. b) This rule has extremely wide application but, if correct, each society will have very different notions of justice and injustice c) Socrates rejects this answer because the powerful sometimes don’t always recognize what is in their best interests. IMMORALITY

Thrasymachus modifies his hypothesis: 2. Being immoral “is to one’s profit and advantage” Claims that being immoral is better for an individual than being moral His claim is that immoral people get more money, riches, rewards etc. For example: If I want a nice car A: I could do the right thing. I have to work hard, save lots of money, refrain from buying any other frivolous items, be good at my job etc. Or B: I could do the wrong thing. Go out and steal one, or steal someone’s credit, borrow money I don’t plan to pay back etc. Thrasymachus argues that B is the best option IMMORALITY

Glaucon and Adeimantus defend a modified version of Thrasymachus’ argument: 3. (A) Glaucon: justice is a compromise between: I. The best: To do wrong and not get punished II. The worst: To be wronged and to not be able to get revenge Laws are created to try and avoid both extremes (B) Adeimantus: People praise morality for its rewards But Those who are moral get the same rewards as those who only appear to be moral Therefore; appearing moral is just as good (if not better) than being moral IMMORALITY

The Ring of Gyges The ring of Gyges allows its wearer to become invisible. The ring’s wearer is free to do whatever they want without the normal consequences. What would you do if you had the ring of Gyges? Are there any acts in our list that you would commit with the ring but you wouldn’t ordinarily? In Glaucon’s story the ring’s wearer seduces the queen, kills the king, and takes over the kingdom. Glaucon uses this story to show that we are only good because we want to avoid the consequences of our immoral actions. The story shows that anyone in the same situation would do the same. IMMORALITY

Why should I be moral? Immoralists: Being immoral is better than being moral, but appearing moral is better than appearing to be immoral: (i) If I am immoral I am likely to be punished (ii) But, appearing moral is the same as being moral (iii) Being immoral is better than being moral (iv) Therefore one should try to be immoral and avoid the consequences by pretending to be moral IMMORALITY

Socrates’ Problem: Thrasymachus et al. argue that something is good or bad depending entirely on its consequences (Teleological) But Socrates claims that morality ought to be good in itself and in its consequences (Deontological & Teleological) Socrates‘ challenge is to prove that: 1. Being moral is better than being immoral 2. Actually being moral is better than only appearing to be moral 3. Even if immoral people appear happy, they are in fact miserable. IMMORALITY

PLATO’S VIRTUES

According to Plato: A good or moral person is someone who possesses Justice in their soul The soul is divided into three parts: 1. 2. 3. Reason Spirit Appetite Justice occurs when the three parts of the soul are in harmony, guided by reason “Virtue then, it seems, would be a kind of health and beauty and fine fitness of the soul” Injustice occurs when confusion reigns in the soul “Vice is a disease and ugliness and weakness” PLATO’S VIRTUE THEORY

The Soul Rational Opposed to Appetite And Responsible for Leading the Soul. The Head. Virtue: Wisdom Spirited Courageous and Spirited Part of The Soul. The Heart. Virtue: Courage Appetitive Animalistic Component Including Lusts, Irrational Desires, Greed. The. . “Below the Midriff” Virtue: Moderation PLATO

Justice in the soul Appetit e Reason Appetit e Spirit Justice is a harmony between the three components of the soul PLATO Reason Spirit Injustice occurs when confusion or disharmony prevails in the soul

Plato’s response to the immoralists: Why should I act morally? Glaucon: the question is the same as asking why should I be healthy? Being just is better than being unjust in the same way that being healthy is better than being unhealthy (good in itself and for its consequences) In response to the ring of Gyges: The owner of the ring of Gyges is making himself unhealthy if he continues to commit moral acts according to Plato It is better to be poor and have justice, than the king of a country without it. Virtue is its own reward. PLATO

ARISTOTLE’S ETHICS

Outline o Lived 384 – 322 B. C. o Greek philosopher who was taught by Plato and taught Alexander the great o Endorsed a theory of Virtue ethics similar to Plato’s o Studied politics, poetry, physics, astronomy, biology, and philosophy. o Among the most influential philosophers in the world ARISTOTLE

Aristotle maintains the following: All things aim towards some good For Humans, this good is happiness/well-being (Eudamonia) Happiness is complete and self-sufficient Some other goods include: Object Telos Pen Writing Knife To cut food Harp To play music Harpist To play music well ARISTOTLE

Reason The goodness of a human lies in fulfilling her proper function Q: What is the proper function of a human? A: It depends on what makes humans unique Q: What makes humans unique? A: It is not perception, eating, reproducing, (animals and plants do these too) The proper functionality of a human lies in her rationality (reason) According to Aristotle rationality has two parts: 1. It obeys ‘the rules of reason’ 2. It possesses and conceives of rational rules ARISTOTLE

The good life (Eudamonia) “The proper function of man, then, consists in an activity of the soul in conformity with a rational principle or, at least, not without it” “In speaking of the proper function of a given individual we mean that it is the same in kind as the function of an individual who sets high standards for himself” “The good of man is an activity of the soul in conformity with excellence or virtue” The good life is one in which the individual uses their function of rationality in accordance with the virtues ARISTOTLE

Virtues are character traits that we reveal through our actions There are two types of virtue: 1. Intellectual virtues 2. Ethical virtues are means between extremes For example, courage is the mean between cowardice (a deficiency) and foolhardiness (an excess) The virtues only provide a means of distinguishing between moral and immoral people; not actions For example, one can be courageous even if an action is not courageous ARISTOTLE

Aristotle’s Virtues Intellectual virtue (excellence) Formed through being taught Moral Virtues Formed by and manifested through habits o Courage o Temperance o Honesty o Humility ARISTOTLE We are born with the capacity to learn the virtues but they are learnt from experience

The Virtuous Individual The immoral Individual Possesses: o Courage o Temperance o Honesty o o Cowardice or recklessness o Gluttony o Dishonesty or naivety o Arrogance or self-loathing Humility ARISTOTLE

Are the following moral or immoral according to Aristotle’s Virtue theory? Murder Lying Stealing Cheating in exams Invading foreign nations Slavery Oppressing women According to Aristotle we cannot measure the moral value of individual actions but only the person ARISTOTLE

Are the following moral or immoral according to Aristotle’s Virtue theory? Adolf Hitler Superman Stealing Mother Theresa George Bush Bernie Madoff Jack Kevorkian (Dr. Death) According to Aristotle we need to see • Whether such individual’s are aiming toward human excellence • ARISTOTLE What virtues or vices an individual possesses

DISCUSSION

1. Why might virtue theory be a more suitable alternative to act-based moral theories? 2. Why might they be an unsuitable alternative? 3. Can we ever adequately judge whether an individual has reached Eudamonia or not? 4. Is happiness, reason and virtue the main function and telos of humans? Who might agree/disagree with this claim? 5. Why might virtue theory be incomplete? DISCUSSION