Lecture 15 Strategy Analysis And Choice Grand Strategy

  • Slides: 27
Download presentation
Lecture 15 Strategy Analysis And Choice

Lecture 15 Strategy Analysis And Choice

Grand Strategy Matrix • Popular tool formulating alternative strategies • All organizations (or divisions)

Grand Strategy Matrix • Popular tool formulating alternative strategies • All organizations (or divisions) can be positioned in one of four quadrants • Based on two evaluative dimensions: Competitive position – Market growth –

RAPID MARKET GROWTH 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WEAK COMPETITIVE POSITION 1. 2.

RAPID MARKET GROWTH 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WEAK COMPETITIVE POSITION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Quadrant II Market development Market penetration Product development Horizontal integration Divestiture Liquidation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Quadrant I Market development Market penetration Product development Forward integration Backward integration Horizontal integration Concentric diversification Quadrant III Quadrant IV Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate diversification 4. Joint ventures Liquidation SLOW MARKET GROWTH STRONG COMPETITIVE POSITION

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant I Excellent strategic position • Concentration on current markets and

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant I Excellent strategic position • Concentration on current markets and products • Take risks aggressively when necessary •

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant II • Evaluate present approach seriously • How to change

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant II • Evaluate present approach seriously • How to change to improve competitiveness • Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant III • Compete in slow-growth industries • Weak competitive position

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant III • Compete in slow-growth industries • Weak competitive position • Drastic changes quickly • Cost and asset reduction indicated (retrenchment)

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant IV Strong competitive position • Slow-growth industry • Diversification indicated

Grand Strategy Matrix Quadrant IV Strong competitive position • Slow-growth industry • Diversification indicated to more promising growth areas •

Formulation Framework Stage 3: The Decision Stage Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

Formulation Framework Stage 3: The Decision Stage Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Only technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Only technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative actions

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • • • Tool for objective evaluation of alternative

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • • • Tool for objective evaluation of alternative strategies Based on identified external and internal crucial success factors Requires good intuitive judgment

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • List the firm’s key external opportunities & threats;

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • List the firm’s key external opportunities & threats; list the firm’s key internal strengths and weaknesses • Assign weights to each external and internal critical success factor

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices and identify

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing • Determine the Attractiveness Scores (AS)

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Compute the total Attractiveness Scores • Compute the

QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix • Compute the total Attractiveness Scores • Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score

QSPM Key External Factors Economy Political/Legal/Governmental Social/Cultural/Demographic/ Environmental Technological Competitive Key Internal Factors Management

QSPM Key External Factors Economy Political/Legal/Governmental Social/Cultural/Demographic/ Environmental Technological Competitive Key Internal Factors Management Marketing Finance/Accounting Production/Operations Research and Development Computer Information Systems Strategic Alternatives Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3

QSPM Limitations: • Requires intuitive judgments and educated assumptions • Only as good as

QSPM Limitations: • Requires intuitive judgments and educated assumptions • Only as good as the prerequisite inputs

QSPM Positives: • Sets of strategies examined simultaneously or sequentially • Requires the integration

QSPM Positives: • Sets of strategies examined simultaneously or sequentially • Requires the integration of pertinent external and internal factors in the decision-making process

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice Culture: • The set of shared values, beliefs, attitudes,

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice Culture: • The set of shared values, beliefs, attitudes, customs, norms, personalities, heroes, and heroines that describe a firm

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice Culture: • Successful strategies depend on degree of support

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice Culture: • Successful strategies depend on degree of support from a firm’s culture

Politics of Strategy Choice Politics in organizations: • • • Management hierarchy Career aspirations

Politics of Strategy Choice Politics in organizations: • • • Management hierarchy Career aspirations Allocation of scarce resources

Politics of Strategy Choice Political tactics for strategists: • • • Equifinality Satisfying Generalization

Politics of Strategy Choice Political tactics for strategists: • • • Equifinality Satisfying Generalization Focus on Higher-Order Issues Provide Political Access on Important Issues

Role of A Board of Directors Duties and Responsibilities: 1. 2. 3. 4. Control

Role of A Board of Directors Duties and Responsibilities: 1. 2. 3. 4. Control and oversight over management Adherence to legal prescriptions Consideration of stakeholder interests Advancement of stockholders’ rights

Key Terms • • Aggressive quadrant Attractiveness Scores (AS) Board of Directors Boston Consulting

Key Terms • • Aggressive quadrant Attractiveness Scores (AS) Board of Directors Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix Business portfolio Cash cows Champions Competitive Advantage (CA)

Key Terms • • • Competitive quadrant Conservative quadrant Culture Decision stage Defensive quadrant

Key Terms • • • Competitive quadrant Conservative quadrant Culture Decision stage Defensive quadrant Directional vector Dogs Environmental Stability (ES) Financial Strength (FS)

Key Terms • • • Grand Strategy Matrix Halo error Industry Strength (IS) Input

Key Terms • • • Grand Strategy Matrix Halo error Industry Strength (IS) Input stage Internal-External (IE) Matrix Long-term objectives Matching stage Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

Key Terms • • Question marks Relative market share position SO strategies ST strategies

Key Terms • • Question marks Relative market share position SO strategies ST strategies Stars Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix Strategy-formulation framework

Key Terms • • • Sum total attractiveness scores Threats-Opportunities-Weaknesses. Strengths (TOWS) Matrix Total

Key Terms • • • Sum total attractiveness scores Threats-Opportunities-Weaknesses. Strengths (TOWS) Matrix Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS) WO strategies WT strategies

Thank You

Thank You