Learning Through Instructional Rounds Richard F Elmore Harvard

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Learning Through Instructional Rounds Richard F. Elmore Harvard University Iowa Leadership Academy April 2012

Learning Through Instructional Rounds Richard F. Elmore Harvard University Iowa Leadership Academy April 2012

Instructional Rounds is a Learning Practice

Instructional Rounds is a Learning Practice

Why Rounds? • Build Professional Community • Develop a Common Language for Understanding and

Why Rounds? • Build Professional Community • Develop a Common Language for Understanding and Analyzing Instructional Practice • Develop a Culture of Shared Practice • Develop Collective Efficacy Around Improvements in Student Learning • Build Common Understanding of System-, School. Level Improvement Strategies

THE INSTRUCTIONAL CORE • Principle #1: Increases in student learning occur only as a

THE INSTRUCTIONAL CORE • Principle #1: Increases in student learning occur only as a consequence of improvements in the level of content, teachers’ knowledge and skill, and student engagement. CONTENT • Principle #2: If you change one element of the instructional core, you have to change the other two. • Principle #3: If you can’t see it in the core, it’s not there. TASK • Principle #4: Task predicts performance. TEACHER STUDENT • Principle #5: The real accountability system is in the tasks that students are asked to do. • Principle #6: We learn to do the work by doing the work. • Principle #7: Description before analysis, analysis before prediction, prediction before evaluation.

THE ROUNDS PROCESS PROBLEM OF PRACTICE PRESCRIPTION C PREDICTION OBSERVATION T S ANALYSIS

THE ROUNDS PROCESS PROBLEM OF PRACTICE PRESCRIPTION C PREDICTION OBSERVATION T S ANALYSIS

Using Descriptive Language Specificity Descriptive Objectivity Judgmental Specific General “The choice of Huckleberry Finn

Using Descriptive Language Specificity Descriptive Objectivity Judgmental Specific General “The choice of Huckleberry Finn as text was inappropriate for this age group” “The teacher did a fabulous job of holding the students’ attention” “At about three minutes into the lesson, the teacher asked two students to respond to the question, “Why did Huck decide to leave? ” “The teacher introduced a writing prompt”

COMPARISON OF ROUNDS AND WALKTHROUGHS ROUNDS WALK-THROUGHS • ADDRESS A PROBLEM OF PRACTICE •

COMPARISON OF ROUNDS AND WALKTHROUGHS ROUNDS WALK-THROUGHS • ADDRESS A PROBLEM OF PRACTICE • CHECK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF DISTRICT PRIORITIES • DESCRIPTIVE-ANALYTIC MODE • NORMATIVE MODE • DEVELOP COMMON NORMS OF PRACTICE • ASSESS PRESENCE-ABSENCE OF PRACTICES • DIAGNOSTIC-INFERENTIALPREDICTIVE • EVALUATIVE

Who Should Play? • It Depends. . . • Leadership Networks– Build Competency Around

Who Should Play? • It Depends. . . • Leadership Networks– Build Competency Around Instructional Practice • Vertical, Cross-Role Networks– Build Common Culture of Instruction Across Levels • Within-School Networks– Build Common Practice, Commitments • Cross-School, Cross-System Networks– Share Practices Among Professionals in Different Settings

IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES P/Q T

IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES P/Q T

PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS BUILD COMMITMENT AND LATERAL ACCOUNTABILITY

PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS BUILD COMMITMENT AND LATERAL ACCOUNTABILITY

Conditions for Effective Rounds Practice • A Clear and Explicit Instructional Improvement Strategy: What,

Conditions for Effective Rounds Practice • A Clear and Explicit Instructional Improvement Strategy: What, Why, How? • Clear Norms of Confidentiality and Trust • NO Use of Rounds for Evaluation • Commitments/Lateral Accountability • Willingness to Challenge Existing Beliefs and Practices • Practice, Practice