Land Attack Systems Working Integrated Product Team Developing

Land Attack Systems Working Integrated Product Team Developing a Navy “System of Systems” Approach Laurence Weeks NSWC Dahlgren PEO IWS 1 B 1 C Land Attack Systems Engineer Richard Carr Planning Consultants, Inc CDR Mike Good N 76 Land Attack Systems WIPT Chairman 22 Oct 03

Agenda • • • Joint Net-Centric Land Attack N 76 Land Attack Vision Challenges Land Attack Capstone Organization Examples Final Thoughts 2

OV-1 Strike Operations - 2009 C 2 Comm Satellite SURV/Images/Signals/etc s FI ack /RFIs T/ on Ta et Ta sk i FO ues Ta sk in Tac tica g ABCCC 2 TGT CSG C 2 STWC SPC TAC Tar get CL FS EW/ SEAD g Armed Recce Offensive Counter Air ge ar T C 2 n t. I e rg Ta Interdiction Tasking in sk a t. T FAC fo Req n CAS Call For Fire ng FSC L Tactical Air R equest FSCC rg NSFS get si o est is ing M Tar M equ TSC r. R TL A m “S us t. P ar COC COP ts Re h” sking e qu r ls na g i /S ion es t ag irec m I D C 2 DASC et Ta Fo Landing Force Status “Smart Push” Call Fo r Fire/T AR TACC/SACC P AOR SURV/Imagery/Signals/etc C 2 Targ sts FLAG SHIP er ts LFOC CO o Inf Tactical Sensors Al ESG ati rm JFMCC Theater Sensors S ac IG k / IN RF T/ Is IMI N MINT/Ale rts Intel Production Center/Higher Headquarters Reachb GI SI I /IM NT SIGINT/I a Re Re ac hb ts er l /A NT l Ai c ba ch R k/ National Intel Sensors Strategic Attack Tas king Time Sensitive Targets LAC 3

Current ESG Interoperability Challenge Expeditionary Strike Group VLS Cells: Air Defense Engagements: Guns (76 mm or greater): Acoustic Arrays: LHD LPD LSD CG DDG FFG SSN ISR Capabilities Cryptologic ESM: Airborne Search Radar: 3 -D Air Search Radar: Organic Pioneer UAV DET 208 30+ 4 4 F/W Aircraft: 6 Strike Sorties/Day: Attack Helos (AH-1): Attack Sorties/Day: Transport Helos (H-1/46/53) Armed Helos (SH/HH-60): 18 4 19 ~20 2 -4 6 2 -4 3 1 Total Troops: Tanks: Light Armored Vehicles: Assault Amphibians: Artillery Tubes (155 mm): MIO Capability Compliant/Non-Compliant: Non-Compliant/Opposed: SEAL Platoons Force RECON PLT NSW RIB Dets 2, 300 4 16 15 6 7 2 -5 1 -4 1 1 -2 4

N 76 Land Attack Vision - Ship Roles 5

Challenges • Multi-Process/Program Coordination • Joint/PEO/PM Buy-In • Fo. S/So. S Interoperability For Timely Weapon Engagement • Host Combat System Integration Cost/Benefit • Operator Workload/HSI • Unfunded Requirements How Does Effort Best Help The Sailor? 6

Response – Land Attack Capstone Organization • N 86, PEO (TSC), PEO (CU) and PEO (DD 21) Met in May 99 And Agreed To: – Synchronize Requirements and Programs – Eliminate Unnecessary Duplication – Optimize Manning and Training Requirements – Reduce Development and Life Cycle Costs – Make The Most Effective Use of Existing and Future Resources 7

Current ESC Membership • • • N 76 N 75 N 77 N 61 COMSPAWAR DIR OPSDIV PPO HQMC • • • ASN(RD&A) CHENG PEO W PEO Ships PEO Submarines PEO C 4 I and Space PEO IWS 8

Capstone Organization Composition and Products FLAG ESC N 76 Chair Support Team Systems WIPT PEO IWS 1 B 1 C Chair CIPT N 764 Chair CONOPS & Doctrine WIPT Capstone Requirements Document Manpower Training WIPT NAVSEA 03 Chair N 764 G 1 Chair Systems Requirements Document CONOPS Training Requirements Document 9

Land Attack Systems WIPT Charter • Chaired by PEO IWS 1 B 1 C (Littoral Warfare Area Manager) • Develop a Total System Approach Toward Integrating Naval Fires Capabilities Into SCFOS, AEGIS SCs, SSGN/SSNs, Amphibs & Future Ships • Develop an Overarching Systems Performance Document for Naval Fires for All Ship Classes • Maintain a Broad “System of Systems” View 10

LASM Concept of Employment Midcourse Phase LASM-3 Flight Test 9/3/98 Boost Phase Warhead Initiation Phase Targeting Data MK 125 Warhead Arena Test 11/18/97 Initialization 16 11

Evolution from a “Stand Alone” Acquisition Strategy Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System LAM Fire Control System Naval Fires Control System Provide Planning, Coordination, and Execution in Support of Theater Land Attack Operations Provide LASM Fire Control in Support of Theater Land Attack Operations Provide Planning, Coordination, and Execution in Support of Naval Fires Building a Coherent System to Meet Warfare Coordination and Execution Requirements TLN 12

Post-PR 03/POM 04 Land Attack Program Schedules (As of 05/01/02) NFCS Phase 1+ GCCS-M FY 01 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q Build II FY 02 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q DT IIA CDR 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q FY 04 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q FY 05 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q FY 06 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q FY 07 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q DT IIC OT IIB DT IIB/OA IOC C&T DD PD DT I AEGIS Integration Testing (3. 1. 2. 1) DT III DT II IOC LBSIT FQT (4. X) TTWCS Install DDG Phase A LBT 1 TTWCS Phase B Fleet Release IOC LBT 2 TECHEVAL OPEVAL SBT TECHEVAL TTWS OA OPEVAL TTWS TECHEVAL TACTOM SYSTEM DESIGN LRIP DT IIA/OT IIA LAM FC MS II PDR IOC OPEVAL Install DDG CDR LASM OPEVAL IOC MS III TECHEVAL S/W DEL. . S/W DEV. Cancelled FOT&E OT OT DT 5” / 62 PC MDS/ TCOMMS FY 03 1 Q DDG Install CDR TECHEVAL DT IIB OPEVAL OT IIB Cancelled IOC (VLS B/L V) TECHEVAL OPEVAL VLS B/LVII IOC (VLS B/L III) IOC (VLS B/L VI) MS III TECHEVAL ERGM Cancelled IOC OPEVAL VTUAV/ TCS (L-Class) NFN VTUAV FDR VTUAV IOT VTUAV MS III SURFACE COMBATANTS IOC FY 08 VTUAV IOC (L-Class) LOE 1 LOE 2 LOE 3 Commissionings: FBE I Cancelled CG Conversion ORD CORONADO DDG 81, 82, 83 CG Conversions (POR/POM 04): DDG 84, 85, 86, 87 DDG 88, 89, 90 DDG 91, 92, 93 DDG 94, 95, 96, 97 DDG 98, 99, 100 DDG 101 1 (B/L 4) 2 (B/L 4)

AEGIS and Land Attack Related Displays TTWCS ADS GCCS-M NFCS PC MDS TES-N* *JFN TES+GCCS+JSIPS-N Converged Architecture 14

Final Thoughts • We’ve Got Traction… • Define An End-To-End Systems Engineering Process • Develop Incremental Capability • Mature From “Independent Land Attack Components” to a “Land Attack System of Systems” Fully Interoperable With Sensor, Command Control, and Weapon Grids • Senior Stakeholder Leadership Support Is Critical Deploying ESGs Need Solutions Now! 15