K20 Education Network Update for the Network Advisory

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
K-20 Education Network Update for the Network Advisory Committee (NAC) February 21, 2014

K-20 Education Network Update for the Network Advisory Committee (NAC) February 21, 2014

K-20 Governance

K-20 Governance

Current Governance Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) General operational and technical oversight

Current Governance Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) General operational and technical oversight to the K-20 Educational Network Consortium General K-20 Operational and Technical Oversight K-20 Operations Cooperative (KOCO) K-20 Engineering & Day-to-Day Operations Engineering Operations Administration Maintenance Provisioning 2

K-20 Operations Cooperative § UW KOCO – – – Monitor Network & Server Status

K-20 Operations Cooperative § UW KOCO – – – Monitor Network & Server Status Troubleshoot Network Problems Coordinate Problem Resolution Provide and Analyze Network Performance Data Provide Technical Support § SBCTC KOCO – Manage Video Switched Network and MCUs – Schedule Multipoint Video Resources – Provide Technical Support 3

Network Architecture Upgrade

Network Architecture Upgrade

450 Sites Connected K-12 District/ESD (302) Community/Technical College (65) Public College/ University (33) Public

450 Sites Connected K-12 District/ESD (302) Community/Technical College (65) Public College/ University (33) Public Library (24) Telemedicine Site (5) Tribal Education Center/ Tribal College (11) Independent College/ University (7) TVW Olympia KCTS 9 Seattle Washington State Historical Society • • • Over 300 K-12 districts and Educational Service Districts More than 2, 000 K-12 schools and 57, 000 classrooms Over 1. 5 million students 5

Statewide Fiber Optic Backbone (2005) Seattle University or College Spokane Olympia Yakima Library Pullman

Statewide Fiber Optic Backbone (2005) Seattle University or College Spokane Olympia Yakima Library Pullman School District Vancouver 10 Gbps 6

K-20 40 Gbps Network: Gen 3 (2013) 7

K-20 40 Gbps Network: Gen 3 (2013) 7

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees § K-20 is statewide INTRA-net § K-20 Network does

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees § K-20 is statewide INTRA-net § K-20 Network does not directly procure INTER-net access for customers § OSPI contracts for ISP on behalf of connected K-12 sites § No state subsidy for ISP § No legislatively set rate structure – Estimates provided by OSPI at beginning of year – Actual cost determined at end of year, based on actual, total cost of service – Includes E-rate discounts 9

ISP Usage and Cost History for K 12 10

ISP Usage and Cost History for K 12 10

ISP Cost per Megabit Billed to Endsites 11

ISP Cost per Megabit Billed to Endsites 11

K-20 Connectivity Costs

K-20 Connectivity Costs

K-20 Co-pay Principles § Established by K-20 Network Consortium § All sites must pay

K-20 Co-pay Principles § Established by K-20 Network Consortium § All sites must pay the same amount per unit of transport – regardless of institution size, location, or connectivity methodology § Co-pay is amount needed from connected institutions after state subsidy and E-rate reimbursements § Must be in line with options available in competitive marketplace § Much lower than actual cost to provide service 13

Concerns Regarding Co-pay § FY 14 & FY 15 co-pay structure lowered costs for

Concerns Regarding Co-pay § FY 14 & FY 15 co-pay structure lowered costs for highest-bandwidth users, but did not address many other concerns: – Calculation difficult to understand – Costs variable throughout year; difficult to plan and budget appropriately – Increased cost for increased use can lead entities to throttle or discourage network use – Doesn’t match the manner in which most vendors charge for services; ripe for misrepresentation and/or unfair comparisons 14

E-rate-Specific Concerns § Concerns were voiced by E-rate eligible sectors (K 12 and libraries)

E-rate-Specific Concerns § Concerns were voiced by E-rate eligible sectors (K 12 and libraries) – Currently, all K-20 connected institutions pay the same rates, regardless of E-rate eligibility – Some high-discount sites leaving K-20 for cheaper options that allow for full use of e-rate discount § For co-pay to stay in line with competitive marketplace and meet legislative intent, additional changes to co-pay must be made 15

Co-pay Approach § Total co-pay requirement reduced by $2. 5 M (from $9. 75

Co-pay Approach § Total co-pay requirement reduced by $2. 5 M (from $9. 75 M to $7. 25 M) § Allocate the majority of reduction to K-12 § Eliminate utilization-based co-pay (95 th percentile) § Freeze all customer co-pay costs at or below FY 13 totals § Ensure that costs for highest-bandwidth users are reduced to align with marketplace § Invoice annually, rather than quarterly 16

K-12 Approach for 2013 -14 & 2014 -15 OSPI proposed to: § Move to

K-12 Approach for 2013 -14 & 2014 -15 OSPI proposed to: § Move to a flat-fee model § Lock in rates through June 30, 2015 § Guarantee that endsite rates will not increase over FY 13 totals § Apply individual district e-rate discount percentages to endsite invoices to more fairly allocate reductions to neediest sites 17

Co-Pay Revenue by Sector $3. 5 3. 28 $3. 0 2. 67 $2. 5

Co-Pay Revenue by Sector $3. 5 3. 28 $3. 0 2. 67 $2. 5 2. 21 1. 95 Millions $2. 0 1. 95 1. 85 Library CTC 1. 56 $1. 5 BACC 1. 39 K-12 1. 21 1. 04 0. 94 $1. 0 0. 68 0. 58 0. 84 0. 75 0. 63 0. 62 0. 64 0. 70 0. 780. 77 $0. 5 0. 18 0. 15 0. 12 0. 08 0. 06 0. 12 $0. 0 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 (proposed) FY 15 (proposed) 18

New Co-pay Benefits & Summary § No more complex calculations § Costs are fixed

New Co-pay Benefits & Summary § No more complex calculations § Costs are fixed through June 30, 2015 § Since usage is no longer a factor in total cost, no incentive to throttle or limit usage § Allows for easy comparison with vendor offers § Allows each sector to determine the best way to allocate costs to their institutions – OSPI and WSL can apply individual endsite e-rate discounts to more fairly allocate reductions to neediest sites 19