July 2012 doc IEEE 802 11 120937 r

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 China MM-Wave (CMMW) Study Group Comments on 802. 11 aj PAR & 5 C Authors: Submission Date: 2011 -07 -16 Slide 1 Xiaoming Peng, Eldad

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The comments from Nes. Com on 802. 11 aj PAR • Jerry Thrasher (member of Nes. Com) and Jon Rosdahl (Chair of Nes. Com) on Jerry’s comments on the PAR. • In particular, Jerry suggested removing the references to 3 specific documents in Section 5. 2 (Scope of Proposed Standard) and he further mentioned that two of these references did not seem to be readily available. • Jon alternatively suggested revising it as “… also defines the modification to the PHY and MAC Layers to enable the operations for the 43. 5 -47 GHz frequency band (pending approval from China MIIT of PRC) that comply with the applicable MIIT of PRC rules reference document”. Submission Slide 2 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The response to comments from Nes. Com on 802. 11 aj PAR § Agree with Jon’s comment • The changes are as follows • Moved “The 43. 5 -47 GHz frequency band is pending approval from China Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) of People’s Republic of China (PRC)) that comply with the applicable MIIT of PRC rules reference document (MIIT XWH 2006 -082, MIIT XBW 2005 -423, 11 -12 -0398 -04 -cmmw. ” to Section 8. 1 (Additional Explanatory Notes) Submission Slide 3 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The response to comments from Nes. Com on 802. 11 aj PAR • The documents are available • MIIT XBW 2005 -423: http: //www. miit. gov. cn/n 11293472/n 11295310/n 112974 28/11637344. html • MIIT XWH 2006 -082: http: //www. miit. gov. cn/n 11293472/n 11505629/n 115065 93/n 11960250/n 11960606/n 11960700/n 12330791. files/n 12330790. pdf • The URL information has been added to section 8. 1 in PAR Submission Slide 4 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The comments from 802. 19 on 802. 11 aj PAR • From Shellhammer, Steve • TITLE: Please consider changing title to “…Enhancements for Very High Throughput to support Chinese millimeter wave frequency bands. ” • SCOPE: Change “The amendment shall maintain the backward compatibility…” to “The amendment shall maintain backward compatibility. . . ” • PURPOSE: Change “pending for approval” to “pending approval” • GENERAL: The PAR needs editing for grammar. Submission Slide 5 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The response to comments from 802. 19 on 802. 11 aj PAR • Agree with the comment • The TITLE has been changed to “…Enhancements for Very High Throughput to support Chinese millimeter wave frequency bands. ” as per requested • The SCOPE has been changed to “The amendment shall maintain backward compatibility. . . ” as per requested • The PURPOSE has been changed to “pending approval” as per requested • The PAR has been edited for grammar as per requested Submission Slide 6 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The comments from Png Khiam Boon on 802. 11 aj PAR 1. With regards to the PAR for 802. 11 aj PAR submission (DCN: IEEE 802. 1112/0140 r 5), in the title of the standards field, it is stated “. . to support one or more of the Chinese 40 -50 GHz and 59 -64 GHz frequency bands”. However, throughout the rest of the document, especially in the scope of the project fields, “ 43. 5 -47 GHz frequency band” is used instead of the less restrictive description of 40 -50 GHz. I feel that, at the very least, consistency throughout the document should be maintained and one of the two frequency ranges should be chosen. Moreover, it would be more prudent to include the less restrictive description of 40 -50 GHz. Submission Slide 7 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The response to comment on 802. 11 aj PAR 1. In response to a comment from 802. 19, the title was changed to “…Enhancements for Very High Throughput to support Chinese millimeter wave frequency bands. ”. This eliminates the mismatch between the frequency band previously specified in the title and the rest of the PAR Submission Slide 8 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The comment from James Gilb on 802. 11 aj 5 C • The 5 C question for compatibility changed following the March meeting. Did you use the most recent version of the OM when you prepared your 5 C? It is item 2 in the 5 C, subclause 11. 5. 2. Submission Slide 9 Xiaoming Peng,

July 2012 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -12/0937 r 1 The response to comment from James Gilb on 802. 11 aj 5 C • The 5 C has been updated to match the latest version of the OM. Submission Slide 10 Xiaoming Peng,